What's up with P7 prices?

"…As long as you guys lust over a stamped sheet metal pistol with welded on breech block, an awkward cocking mechanism and even awkward barrel 'locking', the prices will go in only one direction - up... Just accept it and move on…"
Plus they are gorgeous and awesome. I have to create a "P7 mutual will pact" with my friend in case either of us keels over the other will receive the cool firearms!
 
If I had known more about the locking system at the time P7 were on sale, it might have been enough to push me to buy one.

View attachment 1122246

All I could see in the ads were 9mm and squeeze cocking. However the locking mechanism is fascinating: a gas delay blowback mechanism



Which works by gas lubrication.


View attachment 1122247


Gas lubrication contradicts the long standing Army contention that case lubrication dangerously and unpredictably raises combustion and case thrust. This belief is based on a 100 + year old coverup of why low number M1903’s were blowing up on the firing line. P.O Ackley later built on the Army coverup by claiming his Ackley Improved cases “reduced bolt” and therefore allowed the use of insanely high pressure rounds. All of this is nonsense. The need for case lubrication in the P7 pistol shows there is something off with these belief systems, but the funny thing is, humans will accept contradictory ideas in order to remain part of the group think. Ideally, case to chamber friction as close to zero as possible is ideal for all mechanisms for reliable feed and extraction.

And then the P7 uses combustion gases to prevent the slide from opening.

From Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_&_Koch_P7

View attachment 1122248

The P7 is a semi-automatic blowback-operated firearm. It features a unique gas-delayed blowback system modeled on the Swiss Pistole 47 W+F (Waffenfabrik Bern) prototype pistol[5] (and ultimately on the Barnitzke system first used in the Volkssturmgewehr 1-5),[6] which used gas pressures from the ignited cartridge and fed them through a small port in the barrel (in front of the chamber) to retard the rearward motion of the slide. This is accomplished by means of a piston contained inside a cylinder located under the barrel that opposes the rearward motion of the slide until the gas pressure has declined—after the bullet has left the barrel—hence allowing the slide to end its rearward motion, opening the breech and ejecting the empty cartridge case.[7]


The chamber has 18 flutes[8] that aid in the extraction process by allowing combustion gases to flow between the fired case and the chamber walls, preventing the case from "sticking" to the chamber walls. The drawback of this system is that the breech "opens" slightly prematurely to allow the slide to initiate its rearward motion. The high temperature gases cycling through a tube located below the chamber area and above the trigger made the early versions of this pistol uncomfortable, according to some, to shoot after the content of two magazines were fired due to heating. The advantages of this system are a simpler manufacturing process due to the absence of a locking system and a high mechanical accuracy due to the barrel being fixed in the frame; the barrel does not execute any sort of lateral or vertical movement during the operating cycle as with the Browning cam-action systems common to many other locked breech pistols.[9]

I have been able to shoot several P7's. The slide moves faster than human perception. All I saw was the case in the air, but I never was able to observe slide movement because it moves so fast. The P7's I handled were well built and obviously very expensive to make. I am sure the expense of manufacture was one reason it went out of production.

The squeeze cocking mechanism I did not like and I think it may have been the greatest reason the pistol disappeared from LEO use. In theory the user squeezes the front strap then pulls the trigger. People can easily get simple sequences out of order when under stress and I am very sure that a stressed LEO got the sequence out of order. Pulling the trigger and then squeezing the strap will result in the striker falling. It is very probable that some LEO, meaning only to squeeze the front strap in a potentially life threatening situation, pulled the trigger, and then squeezed the front strap shooting someone who did not need to be dead at the time. No doubt there are sealed court records that we will never see, where a settlement was made on a negligent shooting. Let us not be judgemental to someone's confusion under extreme stress as everyone has gotten some operational sequence out of order, or pressed the wrong button on the remote.


View attachment 1122250

I remember the 1980's Audi 5000 lawsuits on "sudden acceleration". Drivers claimed they were experts, knew the difference between a brake pedal and gas pedal, and sued Audi claiming the car was prone to sudden acceleration. I saw several "News Programs" on liberal networks supporting the victims claims. It turns out, sometimes drivers confuse the difference between the brake and gas pedal, and that lead to automobile companies installing black boxes in vehicles to protect themselves in lawsuits. Analysis of the black boxes positively show time and again that the driver was pressing the accelerator to the floor, and not the brake. I recall hearing of recent crashes that made the National News about killer cars that accelerated out of control, that once the black box was removed and analyzed, turns out the crash was all due to driver confusion about the brake or accelerator.


I had a Wather CCP that also uses that same gas delay system. Clever as it was, I couldn’t hit a darn thing with it and the takedown was about the most confounding thing I’ve ever seen so I moved it on.
 
I was pricing HK P7s on GB, and the prices have gone insane. $3K or more for a police surplus PSP? $4K for a P7M8? I don't even want to think of what my factory .22 P7K3 would fetch.

But why? Yes, they are metal guns (meaning prices are over $1K). Unusual action. Flat. Well-made. But when I can trade one dead even for a brand new Pardini SP or Feinwerkbau AW-93, something is going on that I really don't understand.

HK discontinued the P7 in 2008.

Unless I completely missed the point of Economics 101, two things can cause the price to rise on a supply vs demand graph.

If supply stays the same or decreases while demand increases, then so must the price increase.

If supply decreases while demand stays the same, then so must the price increase
 
Never heard of it, I had to look it up.
Check out the Rogak too. It was a horrible unlicensed stainless steel copy of the GB made in Chicago- probably one of the worst, most unsafe pistols ever.
I havent seen a GB in quite a while, but there is a fella who has been bringing a Rogak to a local show for a couple years. I would buy it for the sheer bizarre hilarity of it, but not for $900! o_O:eek:
 
I've been following this development too. Rationally speaking the prices are insane, but as always, it's the buyers' choice and if you really want something, no-one can say anything about it.

Mine used to be my CCW pistol of choice. An M8 I bought in 1990, and the only modification has been Meprolight sights. The finish is pretty amazing, there's virtually no holster wear and what's there is only because I used a suede IWB clip holster before moving on to Vega (FB2) with a spare mag pouch. All in all it's one of my all-time favorites and once you get used to the squeeze cocking, you wonder why it never caught on with other manufacturers.

At one point I thought about getting another, M13, but at current prices I don't see the point anymore.
 
Made mine seem like a bargain, lol.
I paid $1000-ish for mine brand new and at the time I thought it was expensive. Glocks were much cheaper but fairly new and unproven at the time, and the first Die Hard movie had come out a couple of years earlier so I thought what the heck.
 
I have owned my HK P7M8 since 1985 and never had a jam, failure to feed, stove pipe, failure to eject or anything like that, and I've used all sorts of crazy ammo in it.

Shot from out of the box with NEVER a single problem.

NEVER

Not one problem.

The magazine release is the easiest I've ever used.

It's completely ambidextrous for firing.

I also think the sqeeze-cocking mechanism is the most ingenious thing ever invented for a handgun, BASICALLY giving my P7M8 a smooth single-action trigger pull. The trigger is great - I never had to deal with DA/SA, crummy striker fired trigger feel or long-pull DOA trigger.

It was the best answer ever for the safety debate. I didn't worry about having to remember to take the manual safety off, I didn't have to worry about the safety accidentally being flipped on, I didn't have to worry about it being cocked on a live round.

At the time I think it was the smallest 9mm out there from a major manufacturer. It is small enough that I can carry it concealed but it's fixed poly barrel and overall high quality made it a very accurate pistol so I'm not sacrificing anything for that compactness.

I've loved this pistol from the very start. I wish now that I had purchased 6 of them, one to carry, one to keep by my bed, one to keep in my car, one to take to the range, one to just have in the safe so I could say to myself "HK P7M8 NIB NEVER fired - worth $2975 he he he he" :and one to put under glass so I could gaze fondly at it's beauty from time to time.


hk97m8.JPG
 
I bought one of these at Gander Mountain, in 2010, I believe. They had a bunch of the police trade in's. They were priced at $499. They had their original boxes, extra magazine, takedown tool, carbon scraper, brush and manual. I looked over several and picked what I thought was the best one. I wish now, I had bought all I could have afforded. They are one of the most unique pistols ever made. They were never cheap, and I didn't understand, really why they were selling so cheap, then. Now, they are priced and selling way high. It's unreal, most you see on auctions, have bids. One thing for sure, the $500 HK P7s will never be again.

E774E2CB-75A7-45D3-A932-8E3BB356358A.jpeg 22942E0B-1AFC-4859-9763-6527FE6563B2.jpeg
 
HK makes some great firearms. I admire the P7 as a collector piece, but never enough to pay the premium....even less now.
 
If those mythical alien overlords ever show up
and say “you can only have ONE 9x19mm pistol and we will provide it!” I would want my stolen PSP and five magazines I imported in 1982.

I did have an issue…. look at that date…. no internet, dang few folks with P7, so I had shot a lot of lead through the gun…. and a teenie bit of that lead built up in gas cylinder.

The tools in the box in 1981 were for removing the firing mechanism and a brush for the barrel …. there was no scraper for that gas cylinder.

A cheap flathead screw driver did the job and a worn out bore brush with a “Lead out” cloth wrapped about it did the finish work.

Early GEnie Round tables and eventually gun rags began to complain that the PSP would burn a shooter’s finger if they shot 47 magazines of plusP through it fast a a machine gunner doing final protective fire against the 43 Mongolian Horde

I will say it got a bit warm but never saw the point of games where more than two or three mag changes where needed.

Can you imagine explaining to a Grand Jury why you needed to shoot an entire box of ammo in a defense shooting?

I carried that P7 in Europe a bit… and figured that if I needed it militarily that but the times I changed magazines two times that there should have been plenty of long guns laying about.

Out of concealment up very close it pointed very well. My wife did Ayoob’s LFI 1 class with it and it did great. I messed around with steel and trash from 50 to 100 yards with it and it did fantastic.

It concealed well, it handled well, it shot well.

What was not to like?

There are not any being made.

They are like my Ford Falcon Futura Sport Coupe…. dang neat and few made in the first place (and one fewer since we did two rolls and a flip through the median and into the oncoming lanes) a now missing piece of my youth.

A P7 did not save Hans Grubber but…

Yippee-ki-yay……

kBob
 
oh as long as we are talking price mine was basically $350 at the exchange rate of DM to $
in Early 1981 same as a CZ75 ( no B) which I also picked up.

As a returning service man I imported with out a tariff.

I wish I had thought to ask at the Hessan pice academy if they had surplus P7 mags. they were across the street from my office. Some of the sraff there called me “Herr Doktor Lieutenant” though I explaned repetedly that a 4 year degree in Crim even from the best school of Criminology in the world did not earn me the middle title.

They had just gone along with the Hessan state decision to go with the P5 and I heard rumors they were selling Walther PP .32 acp mags. There had been P7 test guns.

I thought of the three test guns that the P5 was the worst….. but above my pay grade and not my country.

I would have (actually did) picked the P7 over the SiG and to me the SiG was head and shoulders above the P5…. honestly I wondered why the German States that liked the P5 (it was the cheapest in bulk) did not just grab up all the P1 (P38) that were floating about, even cheaper if that was their criteria.

I bought an Austrian Police P1 refurbished with flap holster, & two mags $69 at the Graff training Area Rod and gun during the German States’ testing. Wish I still had it, too.

Wore the holster on my trouser belt under BDU blouse a bit but it was uncomfortable when “flying a desk”, or actually flying in an OH 58, or even crawling in and out of a jeep. It was incredibly slow to bring into action from there. When I had to drop my blouse for some chore the big black holster was very noticable and some Major ( are you required to keep your sense of humor in cold storage some place while you hold that rank?) always wanted me to explain it.

The P7 did a fine job and was easier to conceal and less lumpy.

-kBob
 
I remember passing on one, NIB. About 6 years ago.
I made a 2,000$ mistake then and there.
They're just not my thing, and I tend to only buy what I personally like to shoot.
Oops!
 
Yeah, the squeeze cocker takes some getting used to. I'm way out of practice with mine.
 
I always thought if you were planning on carrying one, you basically needed to dedicate yourself to it. If youre one to be a "gun of the day" type guy, its not a gun that you want in the rotation.

Its not that the cocking lever is difficult to work, but its something that you do need to have ingrained into your brain, so its "always" done as you grip the gun, and maintained while shooting. A number of people I let shoot mine, seemed to have difficulty with the last part, and would let the gun uncock after each round for some reason.

They are great guns, but they are different enough from most of the others, that you really need to be on top of them.
 
I’ve never understood how you couldn’t activate the squeeze cocker when you draw one. You hold a gun you are going to fire firmly, and 12 pounds of force isn’t outrageous. Once cocked, couple of pounds of force is all it takes to keep it cocked. Why would someone let go of the front strap of a pistol while firing it?

Anyways, it looks a little odd at first, but it is really ergonomic, simple to operate, controllable and accurate with with a good trigger. I got a PSP back when they were $500. I don’t think I’d buy one at today’s prices.
 
I enjoy bargain hunting and am quite good at it. A P7 is one of the exceptions. I spent too long looking for deal before I bit the bullet which turned out to be an $800 mistake. The upside is it’s worth almost double what I paid.
 
Back
Top