Barry the Bear
Member
Well this has been a fun thread although we may never no the true ending at least we have the journey.
The Collins collection includes the original Jim Bowie knife
No sir it is supported by the Tax payers and they have no reason to lie about what they have.I looked at your link and found this:
Although James Black did not put a maker's mark on his knives, curatorial analysis has determined that Bowie No. 1 was made by James Black.
A curator or keeper of a cultural heritage institution (i.e., gallery, museum, library or archive) is a content specialist responsible for an institution's collections and involved with the interpretation of heritage material. Curatorial analysis means that that a member of the institute looked at the knife and decided that it was made by James Black.
One should always be skeptical of authentication by for profit institutions. Having a a sacred object brings lots of money and prestige. The number of religious artifacts around the world throughout history should show that . Lots of Churches claim to have a true piece of the cross, or the shroud that Jesus was buried in, or a sacred rock or bone. All of these have brought lots of paying visitors. Take a look at how many Muslims come to see the Kaaba Stone inMecca. I recall that Alexander the Great went to Troy and took a shield and spear which were said to have belonged to Achilles. Since Alexander left his own, it was a fair trade, as later events proved. The Jewish temple was built around the Ark of the covenant. So was the Ethiopian Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion. It also the subject of an internet hoax when a hoax story came out that someone stole their Ark! http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/ethiopia-ark-of-covenant-reported-stolen-by-church-authorities/ It would be funny if the Ark was actually stolen, because the Monks could create a new one, and since only the Monks get to see the thing, no one would really know one way or another.
The Historic Museum of Arkansas is like any other Museum, has bills, salaries to pay and has a financial incentive to hype their collection. Therefore "curatorial analysis" by its staff of an object that draws brings additional revenue is suspect. I would be interested in reading the details of their Curatorial analysis to see if it has any basis in fact. Their claim to the one true Bowie knife, or Bowie knife maker, is just one out of many.