• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

which one?

Status
Not open for further replies.

old fart

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
593
Location
kentucky
i have a chance to buy choice of a 9mm handgun, both are new in box but i can't seem to decide. one is a new beretta nano and the other is a charter arms revolver. i used to be just a revolver guy but after shooting some semi auto's i like them too. since i can't shoot either as they are new and the owner wants to keep them that way, i'm kinda stuck. so which would ya'll buy?, i can't get both only one of them. if ya'll had the choice which would ya'll get? thanks
 
Neither would be my cup of tea, but being the curmudgeon I am the Beretta would get the nod. Great experiences with several of their handguns over the years, versus none with Charter.
 
I have neither. I'd go with the Charter, because I'm oldscool, because of what I've heard of their customer service, because they're American made and because the Nano is too glock-icky.
 
Last edited:
old fart

I had an older Charter Arms Undercover and was not overly impressed with it's overall fit and finish. Looked at a Beretta Nano and a Kahr CM9. Thought they were both well built guns and went with the CM9 because it had a nicer trigger and felt better in my hand than the Nano. Between the two choices I would go with the Beretta Nano.
 
I am familiar with SA, DA only and DA/SA, striker fire action would take some getting used to for me.
 
i don't own any handguns right now, my neighbor was gonna take these to a shop to sell one when i asked about them. he is gonna sell one of them and keep the other. he has give me a great deal of choice. the fit and finish go to beretta, as the charter has some marks and the cone looks rough. but like i said i used to be old school but autos ain't bad. just wished i could make my mind up. i have to by tomorrow morning when he will take them to a shop if i can't decide. thanks
 
I don’t own either of them. But l do own a different Beretta that I purchased used. When it malfunctioned, I contacted Beretta and was informed that they only warrant their guns for one year for the original (New) purchaser. After that you’re on your own. I don’t know about Charter.
 
I bought a Charter Arms Undercover - sadly it was during their worst days.
BUT - I sent it in for service in 2014 & they went waaayyyy beyond.
It's like a new gun (same serial so it's my old one).
I lost the cylinder release spring & plunger - they sent a new one.
Lost that one too! I called 'em & they were happy to have it returned (on my dime)
But they replaced not only the parts I needed, but they said the crane internals were rough.
So they replaced the entire crane assembly.
Returned it to me via FedEx on their dime.

Accuracy is dang good from a 2" barrel.

If the Charter is of recent vintage (and should be if it's a 9mm)
I'd go with that.
Yes I'm old school - but we learned to count, add, subtract, multiply & divide w/o a calculator.
We did it in our heads :neener:
 
Last edited:
If they're both 9mm, I'd get the Beretta. I'm a believer in semi-auto cartridges in semi-auto's and revolver cartridges in revolvers.

While 9mm revolvers are sort of a "cult fad", generally speaking they're harder to sell if you want to. That's why manufacturers don't make many of them.
 
Neither. For the same money you can get a Bersa 9mm which is a good gun for the cost. Are you going to carry this gun as a concealed carry?
 
i was offered choice for only $200, i chose the Nano and registered with beretta which gives me a 3yr warranty. now to get ammo and try it out, thanks everyone.
 
back in june a friend of mine traded his nano for a charter, the charter spit lead and he sent it in. it came back shooting good except it shot a foot low at 10yds, he finally sold it and now has another nano.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top