Jlr2267
Member
Ok guys/gals, need some opinions on which to keep. The 45 is a 4.2" fairly new Redhawk, the 44 is a 1980's vintage 5.5" Redhawk. I absolutely LOVE both, and reload for both, but one of them MUST go.
The 44 is smooth as butter, accurate with my handloads, and is an all around great revolver for hunting and plinking.
The 45 is not as smooth (will be with age, I am sure), also very accurate, and is much more convenient with the shorter barrel.
The 45, with hot loads is every bit as much as the hottest 44 mag, but has heavier recoil when loaded up.
Bullets are roughly same cost, 45 brass is a little more expensive, not much, so no advantage either way there.
If I did (god forbid) need to buy factory ammo, 44 is more available, and there are more choices. I can't easily buy 45 Colt "Ruger-only" loads off the shelf, so I'd be stuck with cowboy loads in a pinch.
So I guess my thinking is that the 45 is more versatile, as long as you are able to roll your own, but if not, the 44 wins....
Thoughts?
The 44 is smooth as butter, accurate with my handloads, and is an all around great revolver for hunting and plinking.
The 45 is not as smooth (will be with age, I am sure), also very accurate, and is much more convenient with the shorter barrel.
The 45, with hot loads is every bit as much as the hottest 44 mag, but has heavier recoil when loaded up.
Bullets are roughly same cost, 45 brass is a little more expensive, not much, so no advantage either way there.
If I did (god forbid) need to buy factory ammo, 44 is more available, and there are more choices. I can't easily buy 45 Colt "Ruger-only" loads off the shelf, so I'd be stuck with cowboy loads in a pinch.
So I guess my thinking is that the 45 is more versatile, as long as you are able to roll your own, but if not, the 44 wins....
Thoughts?