Why confiscation won't work

Status
Not open for further replies.
For all those fearmongers who say "All they have to do is roll up the 4473's and knock on your door" you are missing a major windfall to the anti gunners.

The CMP. Every gun sold was government property, all the sales are documented in one form or another. Easy low hanging fruit - and never mentioned by anybody.

They are even planning to sell 1911's now. If confiscation is to have any teeth at all, then those would be the first guns to recover. After all they are in the hands of old fat white guys over 60 who are too disabled and incompetent to resist, right?

Ya THINK?

I'm going to suggest those who make that suggestion are part of the problem and likely the first to turn in their guns. After all, they are obviously already convinced of the unassailable might of the US government and that if a law is passed, millions will meekly line up to turn them in. Yeah, sure.

Nobody is plunking down $200 for a Stamp for a silencer or SBR planning to see Uncle Sam require them to turn it in for 10c on the dollar and take a bath on it. The ATF knows who they are, each and every one, and even who their trust administrator is. They have their name and addresses already.

No fear at all there would be a confiscation even with them targeted right down to the number on the front door. It's just fearmongering and trolling to suggest there will be some sort of turn in. It's even been discussed in Australia by Australians familiar with our laws and gun numbers that It Can't Happen Here. Even they don't believe it.

Just some posters on gun forums with nothing more to do that churn up others, and a few very ignorant politicians playing to a very small voter base.

Guns are selling out as we speak - the distribution chain does that this time of year - and all those buyers aren't planning to turn them in. And most of them can't be quickly traced back to an address. Any FFL worth his salt will destroy the books in a heartbeat if he thought national confiscation was going to happen.

"They fell in the lake with my collection of AR's when I took them to the cabin for the summer."

Portraying the average American as some kind of obedient peon to political powers is kind of insulting. If that is the way some feel about it, they need to look to themselves for the image. A lot of us are Free Independent Citizens of a working Republic and we tend to obey the laws that need to be. The rest, not so much.

We then revert to our ethics. Not the Law - which at one point legalized slavery, didn't let women vote, even thought that only real estate property owners were qualified to do so.

Obedient peons would never have questioned them.
 
Most people will just turn them in .
Why does anyone on THR tell the
world what they are going to do?

Under the proposed scenario you really
only have two choices maybe three, but
i`ll only suggest two. Turn them in or keep them.

Highly unlikely. Look at what happened in CA and CT when owners of modern sporting rifles were required to register them. Less than 10% did in each case.
 
Just curious as to what the penalty is for violation in CA and CT?
Have there been many prosecutions?
What have the outcomes of the trials been?
My concern is that when whatever gov, state or federal decides to seriously enforce any such law the penalties will be punitive and arbitrary and directed specifically at a targeted group. That group, I believe will be middle class gun owners who probably hold the majority of the targeted weapons in question.
 
I agree that confiscation in the door to door sense will never work but what good is your gun collection if you have to tear your walls up or dig into your yard to look at it?
How could you use your guns if any shot would draw attention, how could you defend yourself or family if any intruder found with a gunshot would mean jailtime for yourself.
Do you really think self defense laws would stay the same in the face of gun Prohibitions?
In that case, the S3 Principle (Shoot, Shovel, & Shut Up) is going to apply to more than spotted owls.....

.....not condoning, just predicting.
 
Highly unlikely. Look at what happened in CA and CT when owners of modern sporting rifles were required to register them. Less than 10% did in each case.
I think it really depends on how confiscation is implemented.

When only 10 % of the people comply i guess that will be a big problem
for them. That will give them pause.

You are probably right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top