Withholding crime information.

Thomasss

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
1,591
Location
Wisconsin
Can a "friend" of a criminal suspect be charged with withholding information, even if they are not interviewed after the incident. I understand when one sells a gun privately it is illegal to sell it to a person that says he wants to commit a crime with it. But lets say a relative hears a family member is going to rob a bank. Is it his legal duty to report it to the police?
 
Willfully and knowingly makes the case. I cited Federal statute as your example offense may be charged federally

18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony
prev | next
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
 
Doubt you'll find a single state without the statutes that cover the above instances. Proving you knew about a felony before the fact or withheld information on a felony after the fact - now that's a tough one. I can't remember a single case made in my agency over a 22 year span regarding this type of issue...

Remember - always lots of laws on the books that are rarely enforced (or enforceable) - ask our former President.. but that doesn't mean they aren't valid and enforceable if you want to take the effort...
 
Can a "friend" of a criminal suspect be charged with withholding information, even if they are not interviewed after the incident. I understand when one sells a gun privately it is illegal to sell it to a person that says he wants to commit a crime with it. But lets say a relative hears a family member is going to rob a bank. Is it his legal duty to report it to the police?

If you are compelled to ask such a question on a public forum you have more issues than what you are trying to lead us to believe. I suggest you hire a lawyer.
 
Proving you knew about a felony before the fact or withheld information on a felony after the fact - now that's a tough one.

Probably even more so, when it’s not first hand information.

But lets say a relative hears a family member is going to rob a bank.

We could keep taking that one further away but it’s already not first hand information.
 
If you are compelled to ask such a question on a public forum you have more issues than what you are trying to lead us to believe. I suggest you hire a lawyer.

Sometimes people get curious? Even if it's not relevant to themselves? I ask my dad and my uncle (whos a lawyer) these type of hypothetical questions all the time. That's what this legal forum is for. Talking about and discussing laws, so people can use our posts as insight.
 
PROVING someone not actually involved in a crime knew - actually knew - about it in advance would seem to be quite difficult without actual evidence like a video, a text message string, loan of a getaway vehicle, burglary tools or weapons, etc. It would have to be a pretty serious crime for authorities to make the effort to go after someone not involved in the actual crime because they "should have known" and try to develop a case against them proving "They DID know" in advance.
 
But lets say a relative hears a family member is going to rob a bank. Is it his legal duty to report it to the police?

Unlawful entry to the US is a felony, if I knew it was going to occur (like it does every day and night) could they come after me for not reaching out to them? I can see that on the news right now and that’s more convincing than hearsay.
 
Back
Top