Mike Irwin
Member
HK,
Yep, that's very true, but the Type 56 is a straight copy of the Soviet SKS in functioning.
Telewinz,
I'm not meaning to dog you, and I apologize if that's what it seems that I'm doing. That's not my desire. I've just got serious doubts about the source's facts.
You're correct that the Soviets engaged the Japanese, but only beginning in August 1945. The Soviets broke the non-agression treaty, which had been signed in April 1941, but other than small skirmishes, nothing happened until the Soviets invaded Manchuria August 9, 1945, after declaring war on August 8.
It's entirely possible that the SKS did see acation in the Manchurian invasion, but I have to question how many, if any, were captured by the Japanese, and of those how many made it into Chinese hands.
Yep, that's very true, but the Type 56 is a straight copy of the Soviet SKS in functioning.
Telewinz,
I'm not meaning to dog you, and I apologize if that's what it seems that I'm doing. That's not my desire. I've just got serious doubts about the source's facts.
You're correct that the Soviets engaged the Japanese, but only beginning in August 1945. The Soviets broke the non-agression treaty, which had been signed in April 1941, but other than small skirmishes, nothing happened until the Soviets invaded Manchuria August 9, 1945, after declaring war on August 8.
It's entirely possible that the SKS did see acation in the Manchurian invasion, but I have to question how many, if any, were captured by the Japanese, and of those how many made it into Chinese hands.