Having not read, an understood all 22,000(ish) laws I can’t really take a stand. I suspect nearly all I would disagree with.
Knowing that criminals obey no laws is this a fools game against the law abiding?
That’s an argument for anarchy, it really gets nowhere. Laws are passed for punishment, murders don’t care about laws against murder…. Surely we all agree murder should be illegal.
Think of it like this, several years ago AL made you have to have a boating license, I thought it was stupid, they grandfathered everyone in for a few years and the test was notoriously easy.
I told a local game warden what I thought and he informed me the point wasn’t to make sure people knew how to operate a boat, the point was was create a method to punish people that didn’t obey the laws of the river, lake, etc.
I feel that anyone who can be trusted to walk freely among society should be allowed to do so armed with anything they can afford to buy.
I agree, however a major problem is we are letting people walk among us who obviously can’t be be trusted. I don’t really see where anyone, politically speaking, is trying to fix that. So while I agree with the statement, it really doesn’t matter as that’s not the world we live in, not now and doubtfully ever.