Sig 228 opinions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hrsepwer

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
10
Location
Chicago, IL
I have a Beretta 92 9mm which I can shoot fairly well, but it is BIG and it is HEAVY. I decided on an FNP 9mm some months back, but I can't hit ANYTHING with it. :banghead: Now, the gun shop clerk who shoots practical pistol matches test fired it and had no problem hitting the bullseye, so I may be just a wienie at 60 years old. Anyway, I finally decided to order a Sig 228 but have not received it yet.I just wanted some input on this gun because I wanted something I could carry that wasn't too heavy but still was reliable and had ample power. I was told by a shop clerk I should have ordered the Sig 229 in .40 cal instead because the stopping power is so much better. :confused: I fired a Glock 27 (40 cal) but my hand became somewhat sore after shooting about 30 rounds. I have some arthritis in my hand. Thanks for any info or opinions you can give me.
 
Last edited:
A Sig 228 is a nice size and there is nothing wrong with 9mm. Cheaper practice ammo. I have shot a 229 (stainless slide similar though to 228 in size) in 9mm and it is a great shooting gun. 228's are a little harder to come by than a 229 because they really aren't made anymore, except military contracts.
 
The G27 is a subcompact polymer .40. It will kick like a mule, relative to bigger and heavier guns.
The P228 is, imho, the best double stack auto Sig makes. Reliable, accurate, excellent trigger, extremely well balanced, clean lines. What's not to like?
The P229, while also excellent, is not as well balanced as the P228, due to its top heavy SS slide. It does help with the recoil of the .40, though.
 
Don't listen to the shop clerk...there is nothing wrong with the 9mm.

The 229 is the Americanization of the 228 and was originally fitted with the stainless milled slide to handle the pressures of the .40 round. The 229 was Sigs first gun chambered in .40.

The 228 is the compact version of the 226 and was adopted by the U.S. Military as the M-11.

I've found the 228 to be comparable in size to the Glock 19. It is a very comfortable gun to carry and very soft shooting
 
You're 60 with arthritis in your hands. A .40 is no pea-shooter. You made the right choice.
 
The P228 has been my regular carry gun for the past seven years. It is comfortable, and not difficult to conceal. I love shooting it -- accurate, and it fits my hand perfectly. If for some sad reason I had to part with my handguns, this would almost certainly be the last one to go.

I shot .40 from a friend's Glock 23, and did not like it at all. I'd much rather shoot .45 or 9mm.

All that to say, I think you made a good choice.
 
Thanks for the responses! Good stuff all. In case you wonder why the heck I'd buy a gun without knowing about it, I DID do some research here and on other sites. The size seemed about right, the weight is good, enough rounds and if it works for the many elite military and police units I read about it should work for me.There is still nothing like hearing from learned voices.Thanks again for all the responses and info.I've been signed on here for many months but just recently posted. There is so much good info and intelligent people here that mostly all I had to do was READ!:D
 
I know you are going to like it.
I actually prefer my P228 over my P226!
The only real fault I see with the guns only comes into play if you have shot a number of different pistols and muscle memory takes over, then you might find yourself hitting the decocking lever instead of the intended slide release lever.
standard.gif
 
You chose wisely.

The P228 is like Mary Poppins - practically perfect in every way and an elite class 9MM pistol as your research has shown. They are also in high demand and easy to sell if you ever decide you have the need to do so but my bet is you are really going to like it. I just orfered a set of Hogue G10 grips for mine. The wife said buy yourself something for Christmas and I will wrap it up for you.

P228andBM950.gif
 
I have a P228, and its a nice pistol. I has NEVER failed me, has a nice trigger, and is reasonably accurate. However, it has been replaced my a CZ-75D PCR which is slightly smaller yet fits perfectly in my P228's Bianchi holster. I find the ergos, better on the CZ, and I shoot it much more accurately. The control placement on Sigs is a bit different from many.

Don't let me dissuade you. The P228, and P229 for that matter are excellent pistols, and well worth their price.
 
I installed the SRT sear to shorten the trigger reset. I like the feel of the 228 over the 229. Seems to balance better for me.
 
Old hands, as well.. lol

...

I've got 2yrs on ya.. ;)

And I own 2 Sig P229n/r 40's.. Shoot them a lot, like them but -

I also own a Sig P229R 9mm and I recently got a NIB Sig P228n/r 9mm that came with Sig 3-dot night sights and there is a huge difference in weight, in the all German slide (much lighter than the American P229 slides) and over-all balance which favors, without question, the all German P228 and its/their stamped slides.

Another plus for any of the Sig 4" barreled 9mm's are the choices of the much heavier JHP's in 147gr that are sub-sonic.. More punch/weight/less recoil, pure and simple.

I highly recommend this ammo -

winchesterranger-t-new-1.gif

You're gonna enjoy this/your new P228 once you have a few hundred rounds down range along with possibly changing from the plastic grips, if not comfy for ya, and go with Hogue rubber side panel-only grips.. They work

P229R CT 9mm (rubber CT laser grips) and P228n/r 9mm (before adding grips)

Picture387.jpg

P229/40 w/Hogue rubber side-panel only grips.. very comfy

Picture016.jpg

You'll really enjoy both p228 and grips, if necessary for ya



Ls
 
Those were great pictures, Lonestar! I think the Hogue grips are going to be on mine as soon as I can get some. This gun I'm getting comes with the factory night sights. I never thought about the subsonic load before. I always thought 115 grain HP's would be the way to. I'll try a box and see! Thanks everyone for the comments!
 
Heavier the better IMHO

...

I read we're both Beretta owners as well..

Here's my Beretta Px4 40 G next to my Sig P228 9mm

Picture390.jpg



Also, if you can find some, Fiocchi (made in Italy) makes some really nice 123gr FMJ +p+ that I'm waiting on a friend to give me some ballistic reports on it as it seems more like the equivalent of this side of a NATO 9mm round.. Great stuff, mild and consistent and less expensive than WWB 115gr FMJ..

Here's a pic of some with my Px4 and Sig P225, single stack mags (thin grips) 8+1 9mm (like the/our P228's, pure German with lighter stamped slides.

Picture456.gif

Picture458.gif


Here's a shot showing the difference in our/your 228 German made stamped slide, lighter and thinner, than my/an SS, made in USA, milled slide, thicker wider, heavier.. (as mentioned, made for the P229/40) and later 9mm

Left side 228 / Right side 229
Picture384.jpg


Ls
 
I want to say thanks to all who advised me to buy the Sig 228. Even though old arthritis has got me by the knuckles, the Sig is still a pistol I can shoot very well. Thanks gentlemen!
PS-Yes, the Hogue grips went right on, first thing.
 
I own a sit p228 west German made and it's a fantastic pistol. Accurate as can be and if you can't hit anything then you need to go see the eye dr lol. Today's ammo in 9 mm is more than adequate to use as Sd and 40 cal is going to be like 10 mm soon, FBI is dropping it and I bet other agencies will follow. 13 rds of win Talon/ranger or carbon 115 gr will handle any self defense situation, hands down. The 228 is one of the finest pistols money can buy and it hides very well. Get a few extra mags and have fun and don't worry about if it's enough.
 
My wifes Sig 228 has over 20,000 rounds through it without A single Failure.
I am in the process of switching to 9mm carry gun because of arthritic hands also. I went with the CZ 75 B. I don't mind the weight and find the CZ fits me better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top