Lee- Factory crimp die

Status
Not open for further replies.
Beats me. My earliest recollection of the FCD was around 1990 or the early 90s. I never did hand loads prior to around 1972 which is here nor there. As to Sierra or any others disputing with Lee? I want to think there were a few advertisements in a few magazines where Sierra and maybe a few others opposed the use of the Lee FCD with heir bullets, I have no idea. I do, as I mentioned, have several of the Lee FCD but haven't used them in years, I never had much luck using them and since my bullet hold was fine in bottleneck I never had the need. As mentioned, I found reference to the FCD going back to around 1990 which is about when I recall their release. One would think the all knowing Google could give the release date of the FCD but nope. :)

Anyway, my view has always been as I mentioned, if it works for any individual then by all means use it. The thread did get me looking for the ones I have and so far I found a 45-70, 308 Win, a few .223 Rem, 7mm-08 Rem, 30-06 Springfield, and I thought I should have a 44 Magnum and 444 Marlin, wonder where those went? :) I can say the FCD was not around in the 50s and feel comfortable saying that. Wasn't much of me around in the 50s.

Ron
 
My initial tries at crimping 223 were not great due to inconsistent case lengths. Had some crushed shoulders, others with essentially no crimp. So after some frustration I stopped crimping. Things were OK for a couple boxes of ammo, but I jammed a few using crappy magazines in my mini-14 and had the bullets shoved completely into the cases. So I went back to crimping and losing a few cases here and there.

I got the 223 FCD in the early 1990s shortly after they began advertising them at Midway. It made crimping dramatically easier - no more crushed shoulders. Did it improve accuracy? Could not tell but I never had another bullet shoved back into the case again. (Also stopped using the junk USA and Eagle mags.)

I do see that there is some truth to the statement about bullet manufacturers recommending to not crimp their non-cannelured bullets, particularly with the Lee die as it will deform the bullet and degrade accuracy. However they do recommend crimping the cannelured bullets to prevent setback and improve ignition in some rounds.

http://www.speer-bullets.com/getstarted/faq.aspx
 
My initial tries at crimping 223 were not great due to inconsistent case lengths. Had some crushed shoulders, others with essentially no crimp. So after some frustration I stopped crimping. Things were OK for a couple boxes of ammo, but I jammed a few using crappy magazines in my mini-14 and had the bullets shoved completely into the cases. So I went back to crimping and losing a few cases here and there.

I got the 223 FCD in the early 1990s shortly after they began advertising them at Midway. It made crimping dramatically easier - no more crushed shoulders. Did it improve accuracy? Could not tell but I never had another bullet shoved back into the case again. (Also stopped using the junk USA and Eagle mags.)

I do see that there is some truth to the statement about bullet manufacturers recommending to not crimp their non-cannelured bullets, particularly with the Lee die as it will deform the bullet and degrade accuracy. However they do recommend crimping the cannelured bullets to prevent setback and improve ignition in some rounds.

http://www.speer-bullets.com/getstarted/faq.aspx


Yup, Speer has no luv for the Lee Factory Crimp die.

Here is the news letter explaining why.

Notice the bullets on the right. These are damaged do to total misuse of the die. These bullets are so damaged, I would not be surprised if the collet fingers in the die were damaged as well.

Anyone can use a tool incorrectly and them claim it defective, which is what Speer has done here.

speerlee-1.jpg
 
Lee doesn't make factory ammo but makes a factory crimp die.

Hornady makes both dies for handloaders and factory ammo. Yet they don't make a factory crimp die.

Dillon, arguably the most popular maker of handloader presses and dies for serious competition shooters doesn't offer a factory crimp die.

Redding makes a line of expensive precision competition dies but no fcd.

Lyman has been making handloading dies and presses for almost 100 years. But they haven't figured out that a factory crimp die is a necessary item for successful handloaders.

RCBS is part of Vista, which makes Alliant powders, Federal ammo, CCI primers, Speer bullets and so forth. But they don't make a fcd.

Questions: What is wrong with Hornady, Dillon, Redding, Lyman and RCBS that they don't make a fcd? What is the difference between the crimp put on a round of ammo made in an actual ammo factory and the crimp that the fcd puts on a round or handloaded ammo? Is there any new production factory ammo on the shelves of any retailer that has essentially a Lee factory crimp? Why do handloaders buy a Lee die set with the fcd included and instead of just trying it to see if it works for them proceed to ask for the umpteenth time if they should use it?
 
Yup, Speer has no luv for the Lee Factory Crimp die.

Here is the news letter explaining why.

Notice the bullets on the right. These are damaged do to total misuse of the die. These bullets are so damaged, I would not be surprised if the collet fingers in the die were damaged as well.

Anyone can use a tool incorrectly and them claim it defective, which is what Speer has done here.

speerlee-1.jpg


You Steve are implying that Speer is jealous of Lee's invention. Highly doubtful. Rather Speer doesn't want shooters to use the miracle fcd, harm accuracy of their bullets and then blame the bullet. It seems simple, if there is no crimp grove don't crimp. This is what Speer is saying. Most fair minded people would look at the Speer technical bulletin and realize that the pictorial of the distorted bullet is exaggerated for the sake of clarity. Instead for some it is easier to think that Speer, who makes bullets by the truckload, knows less about bullets than Lee, who doesn't make any.

Why is it so easy to say that poor performance with a fcd is due to not following instructions and poor performance with a standard taper or roll crimp die is due to the design of the die?
 
Last edited:
You Steve are implying that Speer is jealous of Lee's invention. Highly doubtful. Rather Speer doesn't want shooters to use the miracle fcd, harm accuracy of their bullets and then blame the bullet. It seems simple, if there is no crimp grove don't crimp. This is what Speer is saying. Most fair minded people would look at the Speer technical bulletin and realize that the pictorial of the distorted bullet is exaggerated for the sake of clarity. Instead for some it is easier to think that Speer, who makes bullets by the truckload, knows less about bullets than Lee, who doesn't make any.

Why is it so easy to say that poor performance with a fcd is due to not following instructions and poor performance with a standard taper or roll crimp die is due to the design of the die?
Jealous, not at all, Speer does not make reloading equipment, so there is nothing to be jealous about.

I'm saying their test is flawed and their photos prove that the "tester" was either incompetent and did not know how to use this tool correctly.

You are free to speculate on why Speer destroyed their bullets for this test if you wish. I just focused on the test itself and why it is useless.

There test is akin to taking a, oh lets say a Hornady seating die and setting it up too deep into the press and the crimp feature slightly buckles the case and the round will not chamber, then publishing an article saying that the Hornady seating die is junk and using it will cause your handloads to not chamber correctly.
 
Found this over at TFL reloading section.

Back when the Lee Factory Crimp dies first appeared, Speer/RCBS/Blount ran some full page ads in the gun rags denouncing the factory crimp dies, and showing pictures of how their bullets were damaged by the dies.

Lee responded with some ads denouncing the big corporation environment of the Blount umbrella companies and stated that they would agree that you shouldn't use the factory crimp die with Speer bullets, because they didn't think you should use Speer bullets at all.

Ever since then, Lee has included a disclaimer about Speer bullets.

I wish I still had those back issues.

So if this is accurate, then Speer/RCBS was jealous and went after Lee's invention, he responded by saying not to use Speer bullets with his dies and loading equipment and still has this warning in his manuals.
 
Found this over at TFL also.

"Lee Precision, Inc. states that Speer Bullets says that some of their bullets do not well in Lee Dies, but does not say which calibers."

It brings back a chuckle. To answer, read all of this, it does tie together eventually.

At one time Blount, Inc. was owner of both RCBS and Speer, back in the late 70s - 80s if I remember correctly. RCBS gave favorable magazine writers a lot of "support", aka freebies or huge discounts for "used" tools. The writers then wrote glowing words for all things green, lots of young guys bought stuff on their reading so it worked well.

Under Blount, big green got quite proud of themselves. They started some significant price creep, topping out as the most expensive loading tools available at the time. Blount liked that and the "you get what you pay for crowd" could feed their egos if not the quality of their ammo. Then competition kicked in, as it always does in a real free market economy.

Lee. Dick Lee started in the 60s with simple hand die kits that neck sized and reloaded cases with a mallet. The little kits actually made some quality ammo so Lee began to grow in sales. Eventually, Dick Lee determined he could engineer and manufactor some inexpensive but excellant loading tools and dies that would equal most of the qualities of others while using modern methods. He did, it worked, and Lee almost overnight cut a wide path through the reloading community. When Lee produced his collet type "Factory Crimp Die" (an excellant tool when used correctly) he grabbed masses of sales for the crimper. RCBS turned greener with envy and resentment for the up-start "cheep" competition.

The only way Blount could see to blunt Lee's competion was to lie about the FCD. They ran a long, expensive add campaige in most gun magazines with photos showing how "Lee dies" massively damaged Speer bullets and recommended the use of RCBS instead. I'm sure it worked on a few people but most of us looked at photos of a pinch-waisted bullet supposedly crimped in a FCD and said, "No way that can be true." I soon bought my first FCD to see if they were lying and, yep, they were. The only way anyone could have crimped any bullet the way the photo showed would have been to hack saw the normal crimping collet slits wider to allow the fingers to go far passed normal. I liked my new FCD die so well I soon had one for each of my rifle cartridges and still have them.

Lee's response to the adds was simply to accept them and ran adds saying not to use Speer bullets in their dies and also put the same precautions in their "instructions". But they tactfully never mentioned that the photos had shown bullets damaged by multilated FCDs, just left that up to their customers to understand and avoided any lawsuits. RCBS and Speer sales slumped so badly for a long time that Blount finally sold them off. I haven't bought a Speer bullet since. RCBS' prices soon fell back in line with most others. I don't think either company has yet fully recovered to what they would have been if not for the deceptive adds but, bottom line, forget it. Use any bullets you wish with Lee's tools.

To be fair, no matter which side of the fracus anyone was, ALL the management of all three companies are long gone. Holding grudges against the present operators would be as immature as some folks determined jihad over things that occured hundreds of years ago in the mid-East. Guess I should buy something from Speer again, if just for fairness? (I have bought some GREEN stuff, for features, not the hype that goes with it.)

Lee's rifle FCDs have a moving part that has a learning curve which some users can't seem to get over. It still takes determination to seriously damage bullets with them tho.


http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4182623



.
 
Last edited:
I'm saying their test is flawed and their photos prove that the "tester" was either incompetent and did not know how to use this tool correctly.
I'm reading what you are saying and have come to an entirely different conclusion than that. It is absurd for you to imply that the engineers at Speer don't know how to use entry level consumer oriented handloading dies properly.
 
I'm reading what you are saying and have come to an entirely different conclusion than that. It is absurd for you to imply that the engineers at Speer don't know how to use entry level consumer oriented handloading dies properly.
Read the post above.

It was intentional and was done to discredit Richard Lee and gain back the market share they lost to him.
 
So if this is accurate, then Speer/RCBS was jealous and went after Lee's invention

Would we really call it Lee's Invention? I have some LC manufacture 30-06 ammunition laying around here. Some are '63 Match and some are just plain LC ammunition. The match ammunition does not use a collet type crimp but the standard GI ammunition does use a collet crimp as well as some foreign made stuff I have. The poing here is that the use of a collet type crimp was nothing new when Lee released his FCD, factory ammunition was using a collet crimp long before the Factory Crimp Die was rele3ased to the hand loading community. That is pretty much what Lee claimed in his advertising. The idea was hardly a new invention reflecting genius and as far as I know Lee never sought a patent on the design. Lee did register "Factory Crimp" as a trademark of Lee Precision Inc. I also had an 8 round en-bloc clip of what I recall being 1942 manufacture armor piercing and they also were collet crimped. No clue when the government began using a collet crimp but what Lee did was make it available to the hand loader, I do not see it as his invention. All here nor there and as I have said, if it works for someone they should by all means use it.

One question that begs is why government match ammunition got away from using the collet type crimp in their design? As to jealousy on the part of other manufacturers? I doubt it as they simply felt the crimp degraded accuracy and did not want it used on their higher end match bullets. Lee was never in the business of manufacturing bullets, bullet molds yes but not match grade jacketed bullets. Anyone manufacturing bullets and dies was free to design their own die using a collet crimp, they simply opted not to.

As I mentioned many post ago this subject always ends with argument of to crimp or not to crimp using the Lee FCD. Anyone can easily conduct their own test and or experiments, not difficult to do. I also agree most of what is out there is exagerated examples of over collet crimps.

Ron
 
Would we really call it Lee's Invention? I have some LC manufacture 30-06 ammunition laying around here. Some are '63 Match and some are just plain LC ammunition. The match ammunition does not use a collet type crimp but the standard GI ammunition does use a collet crimp as well as some foreign made stuff I have. The poing here is that the use of a collet type crimp was nothing new when Lee released his FCD, factory ammunition was using a collet crimp long before the Factory Crimp Die was rele3ased to the hand loading community. That is pretty much what Lee claimed in his advertising. The idea was hardly a new invention reflecting genius and as far as I know Lee never sought a patent on the design. Lee did register "Factory Crimp" as a trademark of Lee Precision Inc. I also had an 8 round en-bloc clip of what I recall being 1942 manufacture armor piercing and they also were collet crimped. No clue when the government began using a collet crimp but what Lee did was make it available to the hand loader, I do not see it as his invention. All here nor there and as I have said, if it works for someone they should by all means use it.

One question that begs is why government match ammunition got away from using the collet type crimp in their design? As to jealousy on the part of other manufacturers? I doubt it as they simply felt the crimp degraded accuracy and did not want it used on their higher end match bullets. Lee was never in the business of manufacturing bullets, bullet molds yes but not match grade jacketed bullets. Anyone manufacturing bullets and dies was free to design their own die using a collet crimp, they simply opted not to.

As I mentioned many post ago this subject always ends with argument of to crimp or not to crimp using the Lee FCD. Anyone can easily conduct their own test and or experiments, not difficult to do. I also agree most of what is out there is exagerated examples of over collet crimps.

Ron


He invented a way for the Handloader to apply a "factory Crimp" to their ammo at their reloading bench. Yes, it his his design, his invention.

Semantics
 
Read the post above.

It was intentional and was done to discredit Richard Lee and gain back the market share they lost to him.


What market share are you talking about?

No matter what you think or if Lee products in reality work or not, Lee Precision has a market plan that targets the handloader on a budget. Regardless of the verbiage in the history section of their website or the claims in their advertising, Lee does not have any significant claim to the competitor or the high volume/commercial user. That doesn't mean their products don't work, all it means is their core customer base is the entry level consumer. It really is that simple.

Speer and it's associated companies are part of a multi-national juggernaut that doesn't need to worry about the Lee family taking away their business or their market share. If having control of the market nitch that Lee enjoys was important to vista, they could pound them into submission in a few months.

If anyone has ever seen a P&L report from Lee Precision they have not said anything about it that I'm aware of. Without that bit of information you cannot speculate anything about the health of the organization regardless of the retail price of individual offerings or the quantity of offerings. Everyone goes gaga over a new inexpensive powder dispenser or bench mounted priming tool but to remain viable and keep market share any company has to constantly add to and offer something compelling for the consumer on a regular basis. Lee Precision has a very narrow corporate focus compared to vista.
 
My best guess (and it's only a guess) as to why only Lee offers a "fcd" is because the industry is aware of the market saturation threshold and as a business decision has decided to let Lee have it unmolested. There were tons of handloaders making ammo successfully before the advent of the Lee miracle die and there are tons of handloaders today who don't own a fcd and yet are able to muddle through the handloading process anyway.
 
My best guess (and it's only a guess) as to why only Lee offers a "fcd" is because the industry is aware of the market saturation threshold and as a business decision has decided to let Lee have it unmolested. There were tons of handloaders making ammo successfully before the advent of the Lee miracle die and there are tons of handloaders today who don't own a fcd and yet are able to muddle through the handloading process anyway.
..or that these others like RCBS have done their best to keep handloaders from buying the Lee factory Crimp die and making countless claims that it will destroy accuracy and is pure evil,

after all that, producing a similar or identical design would show pure Hypocrisy and show what their true intent was back in the 70's when they attacked Richard Lee and his dies.

It's to late for them to make a similar or a copy, they would look like fools.
 
What market share are you talking about?

No matter what you think or if Lee products in reality work or not, Lee Precision has a market plan that targets the handloader on a budget. Regardless of the verbiage in the history section of their website or the claims in their advertising, Lee does not have any significant claim to the competitor or the high volume/commercial user. That doesn't mean their products don't work, all it means is their core customer base is the entry level consumer. It really is that simple.

Speer and it's associated companies are part of a multi-national juggernaut that doesn't need to worry about the Lee family taking away their business or their market share. If having control of the market nitch that Lee enjoys was important to vista, they could pound them into submission in a few months.

If anyone has ever seen a P&L report from Lee Precision they have not said anything about it that I'm aware of. Without that bit of information you cannot speculate anything about the health of the organization regardless of the retail price of individual offerings or the quantity of offerings. Everyone goes gaga over a new inexpensive powder dispenser or bench mounted priming tool but to remain viable and keep market share any company has to constantly add to and offer something compelling for the consumer on a regular basis. Lee Precision has a very narrow corporate focus compared to vista.

But Blount/RCBS did indeed have to worry about Lee Back in the 70"s

"Lee Precision, Inc. states that Speer Bullets says that some of their bullets do not well in Lee Dies, but does not say which calibers."

It brings back a chuckle. To answer, read all of this, it does tie together eventually.

At one time Blount, Inc. was owner of both RCBS and Speer, back in the late 70s - 80s if I remember correctly. RCBS gave favorable magazine writers a lot of "support", aka freebies or huge discounts for "used" tools. The writers then wrote glowing words for all things green, lots of young guys bought stuff on their reading so it worked well.

Under Blount, big green got quite proud of themselves. They started some significant price creep, topping out as the most expensive loading tools available at the time. Blount liked that and the "you get what you pay for crowd" could feed their egos if not the quality of their ammo. Then competition kicked in, as it always does in a real free market economy.

Lee. Dick Lee started in the 60s with simple hand die kits that neck sized and reloaded cases with a mallet. The little kits actually made some quality ammo so Lee began to grow in sales. Eventually, Dick Lee determined he could engineer and manufactor some inexpensive but excellant loading tools and dies that would equal most of the qualities of others while using modern methods. He did, it worked, and Lee almost overnight cut a wide path through the reloading community. When Lee produced his collet type "Factory Crimp Die" (an excellant tool when used correctly) he grabbed masses of sales for the crimper. RCBS turned greener with envy and resentment for the up-start "cheep" competition.

The only way Blount could see to blunt Lee's competion was to lie about the FCD. They ran a long, expensive add campaige in most gun magazines with photos showing how "Lee dies" massively damaged Speer bullets and recommended the use of RCBS instead. I'm sure it worked on a few people but most of us looked at photos of a pinch-waisted bullet supposedly crimped in a FCD and said, "No way that can be true." I soon bought my first FCD to see if they were lying and, yep, they were. The only way anyone could have crimped any bullet the way the photo showed would have been to hack saw the normal crimping collet slits wider to allow the fingers to go far passed normal. I liked my new FCD die so well I soon had one for each of my rifle cartridges and still have them.

Lee's response to the adds was simply to accept them and ran adds saying not to use Speer bullets in their dies and also put the same precautions in their "instructions". But they tactfully never mentioned that the photos had shown bullets damaged by multilated FCDs, just left that up to their customers to understand and avoided any lawsuits. RCBS and Speer sales slumped so badly for a long time that Blount finally sold them off. I haven't bought a Speer bullet since. RCBS' prices soon fell back in line with most others. I don't think either company has yet fully recovered to what they would have been if not for the deceptive adds but, bottom line, forget it. Use any bullets you wish with Lee's tools.

To be fair, no matter which side of the fracus anyone was, ALL the management of all three companies are long gone. Holding grudges against the present operators would be as immature as some folks determined jihad over things that occured hundreds of years ago in the mid-East. Guess I should buy something from Speer again, if just for fairness? (I have bought some GREEN stuff, for features, not the hype that goes with it.)

Lee's rifle FCDs have a moving part that has a learning curve which some users can't seem to get over. It still takes determination to seriously damage bullets with them tho.


So they went after him and his inexpensive products and tried to discredit him.
 
To help bolster my point that Lee markets to the entry level handloader, they offer what they call the Classic Powder Measure. This item is a departure from traditional Lee plastic as it contains a cast body with plastic moving parts. This places the unit cost above everything else lee makes for powder and is starting to approach the cost of the Hornady powder measure which as we all know is all metal. To put one of these measures on your bench requires the handloader to open his wallet up a bit more than the users of the PPM. How many threads are there here and on other forums where handloaders gush over the superiority of the Lee Classic Powder Measure? Answer: not many.
 
Easy to say, harder to prove.
True, but saying the LFCD always degrades accuracy can easily be Dis-proven with a simple range test or a google search.

OH, shooters that use the die as designed, not like Speer that smashed the hell out of it either by incompetence or intentionally.
 
Point:
Lee's response to the adds was simply to accept them and ran adds saying not to use Speer bullets in their dies and also put the same precautions in their "instructions".

Counter point:
Lee warns that only CCI or Remington brand primers should be used with this reloading press. If you plan on reloading with any other brand of primers you must purchase the explosion shield (part# 5338680)
 
Point:
Lee's response to the adds was simply to accept them and ran adds saying not to use Speer bullets in their dies and also put the same precautions in their "instructions".

Counter point:
Lee warns that only CCI or Remington brand primers should be used with this reloading press. If you plan on reloading with any other brand of primers you must purchase the explosion shield (part# 5338680)

Federal, Speer, RCBS and CCI are all part of ATK now.

Federal primers are made from a different compound than the rest. They are considered "sensitive" and require special packaging to even ship hazmate, hence the crazy large bulky boxes.

I don't know all the details, but I will do some digging, but the way I recall it, Federal "sensitive" primers went off on a handloader seating primers. Lee got sued and lost, to protect his company from additional claims and liability, he included a warning not to use Federal primers in his equipment.
CCI and Federal primers are made by the same company, so this is not a company dispute, it is about the compound used to make the primers.
 
So to change this discussion and make it interesting, set aside the accuracy issue for the moment. (It is likely not enough to worry about at common hunting distances under 250 yards anyhow.) I wonder if using the FCD to partially deform a non-cannelured bullet will change its penetration and mushrooming ability? Of course for non-expanding bullets it will provide a breaking point during yaw, but might it act like a belt to slow expansion past a certain point or possibly help retain the core to the jacket?
 
So to change this discussion and make it interesting, set aside the accuracy issue for the moment. (It is likely not enough to worry about at common hunting distances under 250 yards anyhow.) I wonder if using the FCD to partially deform a non-cannelured bullet will change its penetration and mushrooming ability? Of course for non-expanding bullets it will provide a breaking point during yaw, but might it act like a belt to slow expansion past a certain point or possibly help retain the core to the jacket?

Match type bullets aside and with a shift to hunting bullets my guess is yes, what the bullet does on impact will change. How much will it change is likely a matter of how much the crimp deforms the bullet. When I seated and crimped the four bullets I posted earlier I did, as I mentioned, intentionally over crimp a few. Not very visible is some deformation on the first bullet on the left side. Any deformation at all will change the expansion of the bullet, the question is will it matter. For the truly curious run a test, it is not very difficult to do. That is my story and I am sticking to it!

Ron
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top