Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
The only people who should not be allowed to own firearms are:
- Those who have been adjudicated mentally ill and a danger to others or themselves and are thus either institutionalized or are thereafter under 24-7 supervision.
- Those who through due process of law have been convicted and...
Nonsense. It does not say "stop and remain here forever." It says simply stop. Stop means stop. It does not mean roll past slowly, and it does not mean stop and never go again.
Everyone learns in driving school ( or from the study guide or a parent or wherever) that traffic laws universally...
How does one determine who is likely to commit violence, with a firearm or otherwise? As soon as we bestow that power on some person or entity, that person or entity starts wielding it for political purposes.
Calling "gun violence" a public health issue is simply a marketable precursor to...
The concept of laws needing interpretation at all is errant.
I invite you back to the simple analogy I made above, the STOP sign. It's direction is law and is elegantly simple, intentionally so, that we may all know what it means. No interpretation is required or desired.
Yet, many bills are...
But you presume Mr. Hamilton to be correct across the board, a presumption to which I will not bow. His premise is that courts by their very nature must interpret, a supposition to which I do not subscribe.
He does at least get the part right about courts being bound by the limits of their...
States do not have to recognize each other's driver and marriage licenses; but not doing so would be economically stupid, and their legislatures know it.
Article III, Section 2 grants "judicial power," (note the delibrate absence of any form of the word interpret), for deciding matters of law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, ... [the rest is about treaties, which are clearly international matters) under...
I'll add my congratulations and just this further comment on the SCOTUS.
The so-called interpretive power SCOTUS enjoys WRT the Constitution was granted to SCOTUS by...SCOTUS!
That tells you all you need to know about who really runs thing in the United States.
For me, a firearm meant to provide last resort defense must operate in a one-switch-to-bang manner. That means it not be SAO and will have a chambered round.
Carrying an unloaded firearm is only marginally better than not carrying one at all.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.