10/22 Takedown vs. Regular

Status
Not open for further replies.

andrewdl007

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
364
Location
VA/NJ
I happened to be watching a hickok45 video on the takedown Ruger 10/22 and it made me wonder If I was looking to buy a 10/22 why wouldn't I get the takedown model? Is there any down side to the takedown over the standard version? I've only shot the standard version years ago on ground squirrels, but when I move out of the city I'd like to get one for plinking etc.

 
Last edited:
If you're like the standard model then the TD is something to consider. Ruger catalogs about 100 different versions of the 10-22 if you go to their website. The standard carbine would be my last choice though. They make several different versions that I just like a lot better. Specifically the ones without a barrel band and a full length stock that fits adults.

I had one for a while. Mine was as accurate as the standard model and as long as you take it down and put it back together according to the directions they work as advertised.
 
If you're like the standard model then the TD is something to consider. Ruger catalogs about 100 different versions of the 10-22 if you go to their website. The standard carbine would be my last choice though. They make several different versions that I just like a lot better. Specifically the ones without a barrel band and a full length stock that fits adults.

I had one for a while. Mine was as accurate as the standard model and as long as you take it down and put it back together according to the directions they work as advertised.

If you are lucky.
 
If you're like the standard model then the TD is something to consider. Ruger catalogs about 100 different versions of the 10-22 if you go to their website. The standard carbine would be my last choice though. They make several different versions that I just like a lot better. Specifically the ones without a barrel band and a full length stock that fits adults.

I had one for a while. Mine was as accurate as the standard model and as long as you take it down and put it back together according to the directions they work as advertised.
I got mine about 30 years ago. At the time there were 2 10-22 models- the standard and the deluxe. The deluxe had a hardwood checkered stock and no barrel band. It was $10 more than the standard. I got that one since the store didn't have any standard models left. Still got it, shoot the heck out of it.
 
Specifically the ones without a barrel band and a full length stock that fits adults.
I don't know where this comes from. Except the youth models, they all have the same adult sized 13.5" - 13.75" LOP. The carbines have a low comb for iron sight use, that is all.


If you are lucky.
More precisely, since they have been in constant production to the tune of millions of guns since 1964, I would say you'd have to be terribly unlucky, statistically speaking, to get one that doesn't work.
 
By the way they are on sale right now at Grabagun for $169. The regular version not the takedown version.
 
I've had a few 10/22s over the years. Only one I've got now is the nice stainless take-down model that I picked up about a year or so after the model came out.

I absolutely don't see a downside to buying this model over the standard version. It's just as accurate, plus has a removable rail that can be mounted to facilitate a scope or optic.

Plus, you get a really cool case in which to carry the rifle around, which doesn't look like it's carrying a firearm (to those who don't recognize the red Ruger logo) and it will hold a couple extra BX-25 mags and a couple hundred round boxes of ammo as well.
 
Well I know I am about the most unlucky person on the planet....but I am 0-2....and that was enough for me.....but hay if I start tossing $$ at them it will work just as good as a Marlin 60.
 
Only complaint with the factory 10-22TD I have is the scope mount is on receiver not the barrel. I took care of that ! When the scope is on the barrel there are no take down accuracy issues.
 
Well I know I am about the most unlucky person on the planet....but I am 0-2....and that was enough for me.....but hay if I start tossing $$ at them it will work just as good as a Marlin 60.
I see you are not going to stop grinding this axe. Nobody throws money at a 10/22 to make it "work". Money is invested into a 10/22 to make it better, more accurate or more suitable to a particular application. None of which can be done with the Marlin, which is a cheap rifle nobody wants to invest in anyway.
 
When The Boy went to an Appleseed first weekend of May I spoke to 3 guys that owned TDs only one was using a TD in the class. All three opined that in their experience the TD could not be made as accurate as a standard 10/22....but that they were darned convenient and cool.

This is not to say a TD is not "accurate enough", only that they seemed to be not capable of getting as good as a well tweeked standard model.

I think one needs to decide if they want a bench rest rifle or a gun-in-a-bag. I have things that are likely to out shoot any of my Standard models if I need to shoot gnats off things at 50 meters and to be honest the idea of the TD appeals to me. I suspect the TD 10/22 IS a better shooter than the AR7 or Papoose.

Now there is a comparison I would like to see done well on You Tube. Oh wait, I said "done well" and You Tube in the same sentence with out the word NOT anywhere.....what WAS I thinking?

-kBob
 
I have two TDs and several "regular" 10/22s. The TDs have worked very well for me. At this time you are a bit limited in aftermarket stocks for the TD version, but there are still enough choices that isn't really a handicap.

However, unlike some of the other guys I don't shoot paper with 22s and I would defer to their knowledge. I plink and small game hunt so I have zero interest in paper target accuracy and can't really speak as to which performs better on the bulls-eye. I know mine are accurate enough for cans, balloons, Ritz crackers, plastic soda bottles, bunnies, squirrels and the occasional bullfrog though. Mmmmm, frog legs.
 
I see you are not going to stop grinding this axe. Nobody throws money at a 10/22 to make it "work". Money is invested into a 10/22 to make it better, more accurate or more suitable to a particular application. None of which can be done with the Marlin, which is a cheap rifle nobody wants to invest in anyway.

What's a bit puzzling is that his earlier posts, for the most part, complemented the 10/22,,,,, said quite a few things that suggests there wasn't a reliability issue with the 2 or 3 he owned... but also said it just wasn't his cup of tea. Fair enough. Then, starting a couple years later, his 10/22 comments turned mostly into basically saying you're lucky to get one that works out of the box.
 
What's the cost difference on the two? I know you can get a basic now under $200. I recall the takedown being a good amount more.

For me I can't think of a need to save space but I guess if it were part of a kit it would make sense.
 
They both look and feel cheap to me. But both get the job done. As stated before, to buy one to shoot straight out of the box with no mods I'll take a Model 60(which is what I have), trick one out and I'd want a 10/22.

I'll take my CZ 512 over either but then you're talking quite a bit more money.
 
Last edited:
I don't see the need for a takedown rifle in my life. Added cost, added complexity. If someone NEEDS a takedown rifle they probably know it.

The only reason I would buy one is if I were going to buy the integrally suppressed barrel assembly Ruger is making for them.
 
The 10/22 Takedown barrel is very easy to clean from the chamber end.
That's a MAJOR advantage, IMO.

Never thought about it but a great point. I much prefer to clean from the chamber end. I've never felt the need for a takedown .22 but if I ever buy one it will be for that reason. I'm paranoid about scratching the crown of my two semi-auto rimfires when cleaning the barrel. Not that I've cleaned them more than once.
 
Last edited:
I have a bunch of 10/22's the only advantage for me is that I can haul it in a shorter space.

I don't have an optic on mine because I'd rather have the sighting system stay on the part that the bullets come out of and a cantilever scope mount off the barrel counter acts the compactness of the take down.

I really don't use it that much because dissembled it's longer than my SBR 10/22 and has to be put together to shoot it but you can't have one of everything without one.

IMG_20130516_134706_875-1_zpsef33fe83.jpg
 
The 10/22 Takedown barrel is very easy to clean from the chamber end.
That's a MAJOR advantage, IMO.
Not necessarily. If you are one who believes that a .22LR's bore should never (or rarely) be cleaned, then it's completely moot.
 
I see you are not going to stop grinding this axe. Nobody throws money at a 10/22 to make it "work". Money is invested into a 10/22 to make it better, more accurate or more suitable to a particular application. None of which can be done with the Marlin, which is a cheap rifle nobody wants to invest in anyway.
True that. I bought one (10/22) in the early 80's that never missed a beat. During the same time period, I worked at JC Penneys and sold guns in their sporting goods department , back when they sold guns. There was a 10/22 someone had returned "because it jammed" back in our store room. Having never seen or heard of a 10/22 that didnt work other than owner error. I bought it at a discount, 40 or 50 bucks. It never missed a beat either. I figured someone wasnt smart enough to only use long rifle, or something else as silly.

Russellc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top