.20 caliber rifles; what happened?

Status
Not open for further replies.

AJumbo

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
970
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I'm on the cusp of adding a decent air rifle to the collection, something capable of killing food. For that role, I'm sure I'd prefer a .22 to a .177. I've always been drawn to the idea of a .20, though; .22-weight pellets with better sectional density, hopefully giving better penetration. I seem to recall that .20s were kind of a "thing" for while, then seem to have faded in popularity.

I'm going to scan Pyramyd and a few other sites before buying, but I was hoping for some feedback from experienced users. The obvious downside to the .20 is the comparative scarcity of pellets compared to .177s and .22s, which are available pretty much anywhere. Is there anything else I'm missing about the .20's performance? Thanks!
 
It's never been a popular caliber but it's not difficult to find pellets for it as long as you understand that you're not going to find them at your neighborhood sporting goods store. It's pretty much like 10mm ammo. It's out there and not difficult to find unless you restrict your ammo purchasing selection to what's available at Wal-Mart.
 
See if Mach1 is still doing the "steroid" treatment on Sheridan Blue and Silver Streaks. Turned mine into a monster. 14 pump max and wow!
 
I just did a search on your question. Found plenty of information on the .20 cal.
Not my cup of tea. I`ll stick with the .22 cal.
 
Robert D. Beeman was a big proponent of the .20 cal air gun. They have been around for a long time with the Sheridan Blue Streak. Odd they called it a 5mm way back then and not a .20 cal.

Its much easier to find pellets now due to the net.

http://www.beemans.net/
 
During the time the 177 springers were getting up there in speed but not powerful enough for 22, Beeman came out with the 20.
Seemed logical I suppose but I think it was more about Beeman making a buck since they're weren't really all that logical. Lots of
people wanting the best/latest stuff and if Beeman said it was the best they bought it. Plus all the 20 pellets he sold.
Generally 20 doesn't really have much of a place. The heavier pellet needs a larger area for the air to push it or it never gets up to a good speed. This applies to all guns but especially a springer. Even firearms jump from 17 to 22, and firearms like to offer a ton of calibers and a zillion variations of each cal. Like how many 22's and 30's are there?
As for the Sheridan; I think it was the same deal, they wanted a gun that made more power than 177 could provide, but that gun was too weak for 22. Mostly I think they wanted exclusive pellets to continue profits after the sale. Their pellets sucked btw, but you had no choice until Beeman came along. I suppose if Sheridan made good pellets their gun it just may have been king of the hill for decades.
As for a new gun, I'd get what best matches what you want to kill, and penetration is imo not the deciding factor since many end up blowing right thru small game as it is, and bigger stuff you probably shouldn't be shooting. Generally I have springers and prefer a gun that can shoot 900+fps, so if a gun is too powerful for that in 177 I go 22. If it's too much for regular 177 pellets but not powerful enough in 22 then I just use heavier 177 pellets. That narrow niche would be where a 20 would fit, but it's still solved with a pellet that's likely still better for any job. Basically I end up with 177 for most everything, and 22 only in the most powerful guns. Lots of people like 22's in the 650-750fps range but I just don't like the trajectory. Btw, when the mfg says 950fps in 22, it generally means reality is closer to 700.
If I want stopping power for whatever then I use a hollow point, specifically the H&N Crow Magnum which will open larger than 22 so it effectively replaces 22 imo. A 22 Crow Mag won't work in a springer as a general rule so they can't play catch up.
Btw, many guns you can simply buy the other caliber if you want to see which you prefer, but look into it first. Like a Crosman is super easy to get and very cheap, but not good quality. A Weihrauch shouldn't be too hard to find and simply more $ which is the quality, and well worth it. A Diana barrel is twice as much as a Weihrauch but not nearly as good quality. A Gamo can be expensive and only sell to an FFL. Many other guns you can't get parts at all.
If you want a PCP gun then that all changes b/c they have more power to throw around and unlike springers they work better with a larger caliber. So for pcp I'd probably consider 22 a min size. Very effective and popular size btw and for good reason, but many want a little more and get 25 or larger.
 
See if Mach1 is still doing the "steroid" treatment on Sheridan Blue and Silver Streaks. Turned mine into a monster. 14 pump max and wow!

If you're more drawn to walnut than tactical plastic, consider PapaG's idea for an old Sheridan in 5mm/.20. Ours has taken MANY squirrels since my dad purchased it in the early 1960's. You can put a scout scope up front (2.5X & great eye relief for a big picture) and have a blast. And, it's nearly self sufficient with no pcp tanks, co2 cartridges or springs to wear out. Just keep 1 pump in her while storing and the Sheridan will serve you for decades.
 
I had 2 different 5mm .20 pellet guns. An older Sheridan. I always had a Crosman 760 up to that point. It was decent with pellets up to 15 yards or so.

The Sheridan really impressed me. 8 pumps and the power was much greater than the 760. I was also able to make consistent hits on pop cans out to 50 yards. The bird population in my area of operation was greatly reduced. BTW. I was 14 and this was 1978.

The other one I acquired a few years ago. It was the Beeman R7. It was probably one of my favorite pellet guns ever. Easy to cock and very accurate

Ended up selling off both for a Beeman R1 in 22. It could take care of pests up to raccoons with proper pellet placement.
 
Did you ever chrono your .20 R7? I'm getting about 650fps with my .177 R7 using 7.9gr which suggests that a .20 R7, even with a light pellet would be in the low to mid 500fps range.

My R7 probably gets shot more than the rest of my air rifles combined.
 
Did you ever chrono your .20 R7? I'm getting about 650fps with my .177 R7 using 7.9gr which suggests that a .20 R7, even with a light pellet would be in the low to mid 500fps range.

My R7 probably gets shot more than the rest of my air rifles combined.


Never did Chronograph it. I knew it didn't shoot very hard. It was accurate though.
 
Well...

Started way-back-when with a Sheridan Blue Streak/.20 - and then, much later on, moved up to a Beeman R1/.20 carbine.

It is awesome.

Used to shoot the Beeman Silver Bear 9.8 gr. pellets when they were available, but have switched to bulk Benjamin Cylindrical 14.3 gr.

Shoots'em at ~ 720 fps (TTBOMR) with the new spring/piston/seals, though nowhere near as accurately or as fast as the old Silver Bears.

Still, they are field accurate and serious perpetrators. Chews hell out of my backstops, not to mention squirrels, rabbits, and crows.




GR
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top