DM~
Member
Sierra 125 over 36.0 grains H-4895 was more accurate then any 150 or 170 load I ever tried in my old 1950'ish Win 94 Carbine.
rc
And, how fast are those 125's going with that load?? I may give it a try...
DM
Sierra 125 over 36.0 grains H-4895 was more accurate then any 150 or 170 load I ever tried in my old 1950'ish Win 94 Carbine.
rc
I agree wholely with this. Fortunately, I'm neither a target shooter nor a plinker. I just want to shoot enough rounds at a target to see what a specific rnd will do.The .30-30 is not a target rifle. Shooting more than 50 or 100rds through it probably won't hurt it, but it wasn't made for "plinking" or target usage. It was designed to dispatch game and repel boarders in the waning days of the Old West.
I don't like the energy dump way of quantifying the effectiveness of bullet impacts. The problem is that the correlation between "dumped" kinetic energy and severeness of the injury caused is not at all linear or very predictable.^ Thanks, guys.
TR, I'm not an experienced deer hunter -- never shot one, even though I tried, but years ago -- so please school me. I've always thought that keeping the bullet in the animal keeps all that ballistic energy in there, also. But you prefer an exit hole? Bleed out? Better blood trail? I'm reading.
Ratshooter, thanks MUCH for that #1 buckshot recipe. I can remember that, and will try some out in the next couple of months. Looking forward to the experiment.
I'm curious though: is Bullseye powder special? Why not any powder? Not questioning your call at all, just curious.
I don't like the energy dump way of quantifying the effectiveness of bullet impacts. The problem is that the correlation between "dumped" kinetic energy and severeness of the injury caused is not at all linear or very predictable.
This is very obvious in extreme examples: A broadhead arrow can in some cases completely penetrate the target, causing a massive wound, but there is not much of an energy dump in the target.
Yes, it is true that energy is used to cause the injury, but there is no clear correlation between energy dump and injury, so it's quite hard to predict that a bullet will be beneficial using only the energy dump theory. When choosing a bullet, look for more concrete and predictable characteristics.
I prefer to have an exit wound because it increases the chance that a lot of blood will exit the animal. This helps tracking tremendously but I also imagine that it might increase the rate of blood pressure.
I also prefer to have a bullet that won't disintegrate when impacting the animal, especially if it his the shoulder bone. There is a slight risk in some situations that a light (and fast) bullet that is designed to splinter in a smaller animal does exactly that when hitting the shoulder joint of a larger animal. I'm not sure if this is relevant when discussing a .30-30 for smallish deer.
In short, I think penetration is important. Expansion is also important, but expansion and splintering does not have to be massive, especially if it means that penetration is greatly compromised.
I hunt mainly moose, large wild boar and large deer and antelope and I use mainly .308 Winchester.