9mm revolver opinions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now I see they have a "special" space age looking GP100 in 9mm that retails for $1549. :what:
Pretty pricey for a range gun.
:D

One of the pundits, when reviewing the new Colt, said its not that the demand for revolvers is that high, it's that those seeking revolvers are willing to pay more than in the past.
 
Yes, I've emailed Ruger many times about building/selling a 9mm SP101, with a 4.20" barrel and adjustable sites like this 357 model:
https://ruger.com/products/sp101/specSheets/5771.html
It was sent thru some kind of "write the president" promotion on the Ruger site, I never heard back...

Now I see they have a "special" space age looking GP100 in 9mm that retails for $1549. :what:
Pretty pricey for a range gun.
An affordable 9mm revolver would bring/convert slab-sided/brass chucking scrap-o-matic shooters to revolvers because of the cheapness of 9mm ammo over other revolver calibers.
It just has to be affordable...not a $1550 space gun with a fluted barrel shroud:cuss:
end of rant,
:D
I believe you are referring to the Super GP100, which is actually built on a modifies Super Redhawk frame not a GP 100 frame. I believe that revolver is Ruger's attempt to respond to S&W 929 and their attempt to make inroads into USPSA Revolver division and some of the ICOR divisions. I will be interested to see how many of these new Super GP100 9mm start showing up at USPSA matches.
 
I will be interested to see how many of these new Super GP100 9mm start showing up at USPSA matches.

Can't speak for USPSA, but not 10years ago I believe a survey reported only 1 non-S&W at ICORE's Revolver Championship. Now Ruger is a sponsor and I'd guess an easy 10%-20% of the guns were Ruger at the IRC last year. Come Sept 6th, the rescheduled USPSA Revolver Championship, we'll see how many Rugers there are. Could be many more with their new offerings. 9mm offerings are definitely replacing the .38SC chamberings.
 
Can't speak for USPSA, but not 10years ago I believe a survey reported only 1 non-S&W at ICORE's Revolver Championship. Now Ruger is a sponsor and I'd guess an easy 10%-20% of the guns were Ruger at the IRC last year. Come Sept 6th, the rescheduled USPSA Revolver Championship, we'll see how many Rugers there are. Could be many more with their new offerings. 9mm offerings are definitely replacing the .38SC chamberings.
IIRC last year there was 2 of 31 at the USPSA Revolver Nationals running Ruger. There were only two shooting Major and only one shooting 45ACP so they were probably 8-shot 357 mags Rugers. Over half of the competitors were shooting 9mm with 38 Short Colt a distant second. It will be interesting to see how much Ruger's representation increases in the next National assuming we ever get over thei Covid-19 to hold it.
 
My sole interest in owning a revolver capable of shooting 9X19 Parabellum would be finding a FN Barracuda manufactured by Astra back in the day. Three interchangeable cylinders for .38 Special, .357 Magnum, and 9X19 Parabellum. It would be cool if I found one in good condition with both cylinders as a set. But I wouldn't carry it with the 9X19 Parabellum cylinder.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_Barracuda

https://www.guns.com/news/2013/02/18/fn-barracuda-convertible-2

There's no way I'm paying $900 for one though.

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/857378924
 
Last edited:
One of the pundits, when reviewing the new Colt, said its not that the demand for revolvers is that high, it's that those seeking revolvers are willing to pay more than in the past.
I know that Ruger is designed for a gun game and it's features may be functional but it's ugly.
It's NOT a Colt...not even a look-a-like-nostalgia Colt... and is still ugly for most anyone who doesn't compete in that game.
jmo,
:D

Here's a look-a-like, out of stock everywhere:(
CA9mm.jpg
https://www.budsgunshop.com/product...bull+9mm+stainless+steel+42+adjustable+sights
 
Last edited:
It was apparent that these bullets achieved significant velocity before losing gas at the barrel/cylinder gap and hitting the rifling. The same bullets fired in a semiauto will encounter the resistance of the rifling before they are fully out of the cartridge case and have to make up velocity farther down the bore. It looked like we had an answer. Long throats plus short cartridges mean some revolvers achieve parity with semiauto velocities through a “freebore effect.”
.
The most common 9mm revolver for the longest time were the ones with the 38 spl sized cylinder and I wanted the 9mm sized cylinder so badly, Taurus made the 905 for a short time with a shorter cylinder, and they even had a 9mm revolver frame, so there wasn't a gap in the window, but I wasn't aware of the revolver at the time.

BTW, the first part of the barrel of the Rohrbaugh R9 is freebore.
 
I ordered a Ruger LCRx in 9mm yesterday, just because. Neat little revolver, good reputation & reviews, uses the same caliber as almost everything else I shoot. What's not to like?

I have one. I bought it for a variety of reasons but none of them are because I'm a revolver guy in general; cause I'm not.

I oiled thru the pin hole per instructions and dry fired probably 50 times and I noticed a little trigger improvement.


I like it and its fun. I'm not the one to ask but I think it's nice and seems quality.

I don't think its too snappy at all and I have not had ANY issues with the bullets pulling.


The biggest fault is me shooting in DA. But that's part of why I bought it.
 
2018-10-10 12.46.51.jpg I have three Airweight 637-2 J-frames lightened up with titanium .357Mag cylinders and center pins and reamed for 9x19. They weigh 12.5oz due to heavy Altamont combat grips, and average 292 ft-lb with 147gr jhp. They are a delight to carry. Recoil is a bit brisk, but no crimp jumping issues.
 
Last edited:
I ordered a Ruger LCRx in 9mm yesterday, just because. Neat little revolver, good reputation & reviews, uses the same caliber as almost everything else I shoot. What's not to like?

As an owner of the same firearm, I'd like to suggest the Pachmayr Guardian grip. Carries well in the pocket and you have that extra pinky on there when you need it. Until you get used to it, the pinky extension throws you a little when it snaps out. But I can tell you from experience that you will get used to it with practice.

A lot of people say it's gimmicky, but I love it. It put a snub back in my pocket again. Tried a couple pocket .380s and just never really cottoned up to them. Even with pinky extension mags. With a full grip and 115 to 124gr I'm good.
 
I'm new to using moonclips, been to the range twice with my M610, and haven't fully appreciated and understood the utility. BUT I don't shoot competitively like mcb. Even at the range shooting bench, with both hands and no timers going off I can't drop my moonclipped rounds in the chamber as fast as he can! :eek:

I think I'm more of a shooter like 35 Whelen...more deliberate. I like to pause, review my last string and plan/correct for my next string, For unclipped 10mm, it's not too bad picking out the cases, but I have to use the moonclips for 40S&W rounds. Moonclips are definitely handy, but I have to keep a cloth at the ready now because all that demooning gets my fingers pretty dirty (no biggie, but still, an extra thing to remember). I see the pros/cons of the moonclips, but haven't fully decided my preference. Gotta say, if Smith made a 9mm in the N-frame, I'd be hard-pressed to not jump all over it.
Saying you can reload a 625 faster plucking the rounds in and out than you can reload the moonclips is sort of like saying a single-stack semi-auto is better than a double-stack semi-auto cause you can reload the lower capacity magazine quicker. Moonclips are about reloading the REVOLVER quickly not the moonclip. Unloading and reloading the moonclips later when time is not pressing.

View attachment 905505

Now I admit not many people need to reload a revolver quickly so maybe the benefit of moonclips is lost on them. But if you go shoot a USPSA match with a revolver the advantage of the moonclip becomes painfully evident. Time is the denominator in your score so the more time you spend reloading your revolver the lower you score goes. Moonclips are the fastest, most robust, and fumble free way to reload a revolver quickly.


Shooting the same match with both a 625 (6-shot 45 ACP) vs a 627 (8-shot 357 Mag using 38 Short Colt)


I think you misinterpreted.

To some of us, it's pointless to load up a bunch of moonclips, go to the range, shoot, come home, unload them, repeat. It's sort of as pointless as speedloaders at the range. It takes less time to drop six rounds in the cylinder and take them out after shooting, than it does to load and unload moonclips.

Now if you're playing games where you must reload quickly or are in a self defense situation, that's a different matter entirely and moonclips would absolutely rule.

35W
 
Last edited:
I'm new to using moonclips, been to the range twice with my M610, and haven't fully appreciated and understood the utility. BUT I don't shoot competitively like mcb. Even at the range shooting bench, with both hands and no timers going off I can't drop my moonclipped rounds in the chamber as fast as he can! :eek:

I think I'm more of a shooter like 35 Whelen...more deliberate. I like to pause, review my last string and plan/correct for my next string, For unclipped 10mm, it's not too bad picking out the cases, but I have to use the moonclips for 40S&W rounds. Moonclips are definitely handy, but I have to keep a cloth at the ready now because all that demooning gets my fingers pretty dirty (no biggie, but still, an extra thing to remember). I see the pros/cons of the moonclips, but haven't fully decided my preference. Gotta say, if Smith made a 9mm in the N-frame, I'd be hard-pressed to not jump all over it.
They do, it's the 929. 8-shot 9mm on the same N-frame as the 627.
 
Opinion- Unless you do not handload, the 9mm makes no sense vs. the .38 Special, the latter of which is far more versatile when handloaded. Now if you only shoot factory loads and want cheap plinking ammunition, the 9mm would make more sense.




I have a couple of 1917's and although I keep a dozen or so moonclips loaded and ready to go, I can load the cylinders and pluck the empties out (when they don't fall out on their own) way faster than I can dicque around loading and unloading moonclips. But to each his own.

35W
I have both a Taurus blue Titanium in 38 special +p and a Taurus 905. I reload as well and agree that the 38 is more versatile when you are able to tailor your loads. I like the 905 and it's super accurate (really like), plus the weight is good and it feels balanced. It also soaks up the recoil which is a bit more than 38 special. The one thing I hate -it's the only dislike BTW- are the moonclips. It comes with moonclips, and I ordered after market clips which are much better. But removing and loading bullets on moonclips is a PITA as another member posted. Knowing what I know and prefer now, if I had to do it all over again, I would have probably just purchased a heavier 38 special rated at +p. This of course if before I found a load that works well on the Taurus TItanium light. Other members have mentioned the Taurus 692. That is a real nice revolver and versatile as one can shoot three different calibers. The only thing that I don't like about it is that it isn't fluted. Sure one can argue that when a revolver is fluted, it's not as strong, but I still prefer the fluting as is makes the revolver looks much nicer. Still, 3 calibers from one gun is an excellent option for the price.
 
I'm no speed demon. It takes me on average, 4 seconds to eject the moonclip from my J-frame and reload.
 
But how long does it take you to remove all the spent casings from the moon clip and put new bullets? I suspect it is longer than 4 seconds. Hence the statement "removing and loading the bullets on moonclips."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top