I mentioned karma. I really don't believe that calling a guy a yahoo in any context somehow faciliates later breaking your spotting scope. Therefore, my context was figurative.
Maybe some buy into karma, but I'm really not one of those people. I've met far too many people who never get what's coming to them to believe in some cosmic force of poetic justice.
What I am posing the possibility of (and not making the assertion of, mind you) that sometimes there is an undertone to our communications that translate into reactions. A vast majority of communications is non-verbal, and is integral to communication.
In my opinion, the later re-telling describing the persons who quite possibly were oblivious to the situation until it was pointed out-- and then made an effort to correct it-- as yahoos (a degoratory description) seems to suggest the *possibility* of a predisposed attitude that day.
If one existed or developed, one should not be suprised to see a deterioration in interactions.
I've been there. I've had bad days and let it show in my attitudes before. At some point, you realize that you become part of your own problem and its best to take a step away for a bit.
I am suggesting that this condition MAY have presented itself. But come on--- as I said before, it didn't break a spotting scope. Well, on second thought maybe.... I've also let myself get annoyed enough that I've gotten careless before, as well. So who knows....
My view was that the first set probably didn't deserve the assessment that they got, and I took it as potentially an indication of the mood.
-- John