A Week with Hodgdon H110

Status
Not open for further replies.

il.bill

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
1,416
Location
FOID Land (Illinois)
I just spent a week with H110 and it was an eye opener.

After a lifetime of turning wrenches and screwdrivers for a living, heavy loads with sharp recoil in handguns are just no fun for me and my worn wrists. I have been loading most of my revolver rounds with lead bullets over Trail Boss the past couple of years and like shooting them a lot. I recently acquired a dandy double stack RIA M1911 A2 with both 9x19mm and 22 TCM barrels and have found out that the 22 TCM is an absolute hoot, albeit a little expensive to shoot at a little over $0.40 per round.

That lead me to trying to reload the 22 TCM (not an endeavor for the impatient or the faint of heart to be sure - that is another story all by itself. With no SAAMI specs to go by, I followed Mr. Craig's (the 'C' of TCM) advice and bought a couple pounds of H110. It was tedious weighing each individual charge (awfully high pressures pushing that little bullet), but once I had three dozen ready to try, I thought I may as well do some more loading while I was set up. First was 12 each of my four different 240 grain bullets (BHN18 or X-treme Plated) in .44 Magnum to try in the Ruger Super Blackhawk and my new Taurus M44 Then about 30 rounds of 100 grain Coated LSWC for the .327 Federal Magnum Ruger SP101. Finally, 50 of my BHN18 Coated LSWC 158 grain Missouri Bullets in .357 Magnum, tested in a three inch S&W 686+.

I measured them all to the starting load specs and went out shooting. The RIA M1911 A2 ran perfectly (an awful lot of work went into getting those silly 22 TCM cartridges to pass the 'plunk test' first, though). The three magnum cartridges were the first 'real' magnum level loads I have reloaded, and they were all only slightly softer than 'hot' factory loads. The .44 Magnums made beautiful big round holes and were comfortable enough to shoot a couple dozen out of each revolver - I will try to get used to them and see how my wrists like them over time.

The two real surprises were the .327 Fed Mag and the .357 Mag performances. They were both exactly what I had originally been looking for when I bought those two guns. They felt perfect (with rubber Hogue grips in place) when firing the revolvers and were as accurate as anything I have shot in the SP101 or the 686+.

I had always shied away from H110 because of the very narrow range between starting and maximum loads, but not any more. Having to get some for the 22 TCM turned out to be a serendipitous discovery for me. I will still use plenty of Trail Boss in my .45 Colt 'cowboy loads', and for some casual plinking in the magnums, but I think I better look for some more H110 since a pound of that powder gets used up pretty quickly.
 
I shoot a lot of .357 Magnum ammo off and on and my favorite powder for that is H110/ W296. I have used others but always come back to it. I usually shoot a 158gr bullet in the .357 Mag.
 
I have a couple of 357's, a 41 & 44 mag, a Raging Bull in 454 & a BH in 30 Carbine. I'm usually never lower than a couple of pounds of H110 on the shelf.

As to the narrow load range, well I usually just go with the list data for the weight bullets I'm using and have found few issues. The ones I DID find were usually spread groups due to too much or not enough crimp.
 
I've always had great results in the 44mag using 2400 for my full power loads and unique for my reduced loads
 
I've always had great results in the 44mag using 2400 for my full power loads and unique for my reduced loads

2400 has always been the magnum powder I was going to try first, but the 22TCM wanting the H110 made the decision for me. Some day I will get some 2400, but for now, the H110 (a couple bucks cheaper per pound than Win 296) is doing quite nicely.
 
I love h110. It has some quirks like wanting high load density and a magnum primer, but it is the powder for me when you want your magnum to be a magnum.
 
Yep! H110 is my go to powder for full house loads in my 44s. While weighing each load can be tedious, I'm in no hurry, and actually find it kinda therapeutic! LOL
 
Glad you tried H110. It really is a great magnum powder. Frankly I don't mind at all just sticking with the narrow guidelines. It burns clean and has plenty of power. When I want to download, as you have found trailboss works wonders. Unique is also great for those middle range loads, but I haven't found much use for the in-between. Either full tilt or powder puff (which is a misnomer anyway - 165 grains of lead at 1000 fps feels like nothing in a large revolver).
 
2400 has always been the magnum powder I was going to try first, but the 22TCM wanting the H110 made the decision for me. Some day I will get some 2400, but for now, the H110 (a couple bucks cheaper per pound than Win 296) is doing quite nicely.
That' great! I say use whatever works. I only tried H110 back in the 90's after reading articles in my favorite gun magazines, that were saying how well it works for them. Just because I didn't get the same results doesn't make it a bad powder. Besides I also use 2400 for my 22 Hornet loads ,so it just makes sence for me.
 
I had always shied away from H110 because of the very narrow range between starting and maximum loads, but not any more.

H110/W296 does have very narrow parameters, but when used within those parameters, it works very well and is very safe. Never understood why folks are so leery of it. When I first started to handload for magnum caliber handguns, it was what was recommended to me by an older gentleman that was happy to mentor. He always claimed that if one used it according to published load recipes, it was one of the safest and the most accurate powders out there for magnum handguns. Over the years I have found that to be true.
 
Good stuff,
not flexible but does what it was designed to do very well.
Funny how H110 and HP38 almost always seem to be less expensive than the Winchester
equivalent W296 and W231.
Guess printing the extra letters in Winchester costs more:)
 
Funny thing about that H110.
I just finished working up a full-house 357Mag load for a 358156 SWC in a 6.5" Blackhawk, and found that the harder I pushed that SWC (up to very close to book max), the more accurate it was. At about 1295 fps I called it good.

After almost 30 years of reloading, this is the first time I really wrung out a load with H110. Turns out I like it too.
I don't know why I waited so long to mess with it.
 
After almost 30 years of reloading, this is the first time I really wrung out a load with H110. Turns out I like it too.
I don't know why I waited so long to mess with it.

Who'da ever thunk it, eh? ;)

H110/W296, because it was recommended to me by that old friend/mentor of mine, was the first true Magnum powder I ever used. Used it for years, just as my mentor told me to. Using upper ends of the loads recipes, using a magnum primer and a heavy crimp. Always made for very accurate, consistent and legitimate "magnum" ammo. Wasn't until years later when I got acquainted with internet gun forums did I wonder how I avoided blowing off all my fingers from this highly dangerous powder that was similar to handling warm liquid Nitroglycerin. Apparently it was 'cause I followed directions and used proper reloading technique.
 
"H110 screams "No wimps please" "... That's how Hodgdon used to advertise H110. I love the stuff in my .44 mag and 30 carbine loads... Consistent high velocities that reach a true full power, extremely consistent thrown charges, and very accurate results. It's identical counterpart WW296, used to long ago have WW published reloading data that was of an even narrower range of start and max; Use the charge weight exactly as shown. I'm pretty sure that was 24/25 grains of WW296, 240 gr LSWC w/GC/jacketed bullet, WW primer, and very heavy crimp.

Used this data forever, and it never failed to deliver. Sure, it's substantial blast and raw power are impressive, and I guess this has some folks thinking it's "dangerous"? Music to my ears. Love H110/WW296.
 
Wasn't until years later when I got acquainted with internet gun forums did I wonder how I avoided blowing off all my fingers from this highly dangerous powder that was similar to handling warm liquid Nitroglycerin.
:rofl:
 
I like H-110, during the powder shortage I tried Alliant 300MP and found it to be a very good powder for 44 mag and 22 Hornet. I have not tried 300 MP for 357 mag yet, but so far I could replace H-110 with 300 MP.
 
In November, in the Haymarsh, the smell of H-One ten and splattered pumpkins permeates the Autumn's air. The bark of a large bore echoes out across the swamp. A blue jay starts at the report. The dozing geese don't seem to notice, though I am sure the Whitetails will.

Would a powder of any other name smell as sweet? Not today.
 
H110 is a fine powder like sand, sticks to everywhere. I like 4227 better when loading 300BLK which is the only place I use H110 for..
 
It is a pain to clean up. Get a tube of powdered graphite lube from the hardware store. Squirt one squirt into each new jug and shake it up. Helps tremendously.
 
It's great for full throttle stuff.
I don't use it very much, because I shoot cast bullets 90% of the time and I like to tame those down a bit with 2400.

But for full power jacketed bullets in my .45 Colt (Ruger) and my .357 mag, I love it.

I can't figure out what is dangerous about it either. It's silly.

One thing that I haven't seen mentioned (not a safety thing), use magnum primers with it to make sure you get good ignition.
Also, if you can't find it (I'm sure you already know this) W296 is the same powder.
 
...
One thing that I haven't seen mentioned (not a safety thing), use magnum primers with it to make sure you get good ignition.
...

Magnum primers to ignite the H110 so far in everything EXCEPT the 22 TCM.

Mr. Craig (I read it on the internet, so you know it must be true!) specifically said to use only small pistol primers (NOT small pistol magnum) in his 22 TCM cartridge. Until SAAMI comes up with some standard specs, I will go with the recommendation of the fellow who came up with the cartridge himself.

In everything else, I have found magnum primers to be specified for the published loads.

I do not get the 'dangerous' to use H110 angle either. It would be nearly impossible to double charge a case, I weigh each individual charge, and stay within the published very narrow min-to max load range.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top