Eldon, thanks for that link. It does appear that there are others with experiences similar to mine.
The references to the "TAP, RACK, BANG" started me thinking about how this might possibly have contributed.
Ok, this event occured 30 years ago and at this point in time, I am totally relying on my range notes for the details. Reviewing my notes and parsing them carefully, I see this:
I said we were doing double-taps, Actually, we were practicing the El Presidente drill.
The drill is normally 3 targets. 2 shots each target, reload, 2 shots each target.
Ny notes say the event occured while firing on the second target which would be the middle target of the three. The second time through, the middle target is also the fifht target of the drill, counting in sequence.
It is possible that I was working the drill with a full load out (7+1) and reloading when I ran dry. I did and still do this quite often. This would place my tactical reload between the 4th and 5th double-tap which means before firing on the middle (fifth) target. When firing this drill I randomly change the order in which I engage the targets for the second set, sometimes left to right, sometimes right to left.
It is possible that in the initial confusion and concentrating on the condition of the gun, I recorded the firing sequence incorrectly. It is possible that the squib occured on the last round of the mag, that the slide did not lock, and that I cycled the slide after inserting the fresh mag. As I am left handed, I did not and do not use the slide lock to release the slide, I just rack it with my right hand and I could have done this in the course of a reload without conciously registering the fact that the slide had failed to lock back and thus possibly failed to cycle. If I was firing from left to right at the time, I could well have recorded that as the second target, forgetting that this was on the second set and not the first.
This is another explanation that accounts for all of the factors of the event and explains why I might have recorded it incorrectly. As I said, it is possible. But earlier today (yesterday now) I spoke with a friend who was there that day and his recollection was that it was as I initailly reported it so it is unlikely that my initial accounting here was a product of faulty memory. I think I just had a convergence of the factors necessary for an improbable event to occur.