THe difference between pax's position and mine is a mindset difference. I assume that anything going bump in the night is a threat unless proven otherwise, and the light is the means to prove otherwise.
A mindset difference it is indeed.
Here's the rules I work under:
"Never point your gun at anything you don't intend to destroy.
Be sure of your target, and what's beyond or behind your target."
I do agree that pointing
a light at the noise is a good way to prove otherwise. I just don't believe that pointing
the gun at an unidentified target is a good idea.
Put more plainly. Unless I have a darn good reason to do so -- as in, an
identified threat -- I'm not going to wave my gun at the living room wall if one of my family members could be behind that wall. I'm not going to point my gun at an unidentified noise if there is
any possibility that someone I love could have made that noise. I'm not going to wave my gun in the floor-to-ceiling search pattern if my family members are upstairs, and I'm
dang sure not going to point the gun at an unidentified human being until I've made sure it is someone I don't mind killing.
I think it is frightening how many people are willing to throw away half of the Four Cardinal Rules just because there's a freakin' light on the end of their guns.
pax
People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die. -- Jim Davidson