Buzznrose
Member
https://www.recoilweb.com/predictions-on-the-glock-44-3-other-upcoming-glocks-155146.htmlI can only hope the G49 rumor is true
https://www.recoilweb.com/predictions-on-the-glock-44-3-other-upcoming-glocks-155146.htmlI can only hope the G49 rumor is true
I failed to mention that these being semi-autos we are discussing there would probably be problems with magazines if you try and use 40's in a 10!! Not so much 38's in a 357.I was aware of the 40 in a 10 thing, but I would not advise it, not to mention the 40 would probably not have the recoil impulse to 'reliably' make a 10 function properly.
I failed to mention that these being semi-autos we are discussing there would probably be problems with magazines if you try and use 40's in a 10!! Not so much 38's in a 357.
Probably?... not really.
Prove it. Fire several hundred rounds WITH OUT a malfunction and then let us know how well a 40 will function in a 10.
Correct you are Grasshopper. The point being you can't compare apples to oranges. Well I have, as hundreds of thousands of others, been shooting 38's in a 357' WITH NO SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS FOR DECADES.Why? I don't think anyone is condoning using 40 in a 10mm for defensive purposes. If it functions MOST of the time for cheap range plinking, what does it matter if its 100% reliable?
The entire point was to your 38 to 357 comment, which was a cheaper less recoiling option to shoot. Which is pretty well the same. shooting 38's in a 357 exclusively comes with its own set of problems.
Prove it. Fire several hundred rounds WITH OUT a malfunction and then let us know how well a 40 will function in a 10.
I did not think you could prove it!!! As the say 'ONE EXCUSE IS AS GOOD AS ANOTHER'!At about $12 a box for .40 S&W, if you pay me the $170 to prove you wrong, I'm your huckleberry...
Which 10 are you talking about??? So you consider the use of 40 in a 10 reliable enough to go in harms way with 40 in your 10??I have 20,000+ round of 40S&W through a 10mm Auto. Never had a problem.
Which 10 are you talking about??? So you consider the use of 40 in a 10 reliable enough to go in harms way with 40 in your 10??
1st things 1st. Get Springfield to start making the xds in 4 inch barrel. They stopped last year. Only the 3.3 is being made.As the title says, I wonder why there are no single stack compact guns in 10mm? If the 45 fits, a 10mm will fit. Is it something mechanical just not doable in that size or is it just not a marketable item?
I would buy the first 4” xds or shield 10 that I saw.
need to start chanting to the manufacturers to give us a carry 10 that isn’t a full steel 1911 or a fat daddy g29.
Thank you, and you are proving my point. We were talking about the 38/357 compared to the 40/10. The 38 is COMPLETELY reliable/dependable in a 357 so I would take in 'in harms way' with no concerns, but, I like you, would not even consider going in harms way with my 10 stoked with 40 ammo!!View attachment 893880
ETA: In a semi-auto handgun, I would not carry 40S&W in a 10mm Auto into "harms way". That said it would not concern me using 40S&W in a 10mm semi-auto to save money to train, practice, and compete and then for excursions into "harms way" switch to the 10mm.
40S&W in a 10mm is better than a sharp stick though.Thank you, and you are proving my point. We were talking about the 38/357 compared to the 40/10. The 38 is COMPLETELY reliable/dependable in a 357 so I would take in 'in harms way' with no concerns, but, I like you, would not even consider going in harms way with my 10 stoked with 40 ammo!!
Agreed, something is better than nothing, IF YOU DON'T HAVE A CHOICE! OH, by the way we are neighbors!40S&W in a 10mm is better than a sharp stick though.
I can't help it. Every time I see this thread title, "Any reason there are no xds/shield’s in 10mm?," I think the same thing.
Because wrist fusion should only be performed by qualified medical professionals.