Anyone is Cali order a SU-16

Status
Not open for further replies.
I got one a little while ago and had posted this on another board. Figured I'd save myself some typing, so I copied it here.


"I got my SU-16 about a week ago and got to take it out on about one of the coldest days we have had around here in awhile. It was 15* and windy. I got to fire 150 rounds at 25 and 50 yards. This was a "just to get to shoot it trip" so its not any kind of wring it out type report. From what I've seen so far just playing with it, its not a flimsy, thrown together rifle. Mine is tight, and seems to be well made and thought out. The bipod is functional and works, but I probably will not use it much. The gun is tight when open and has no wiggle or wobble. You would never know it folded if they didnt tell you. You just push the pin out with a bullet or drift and it folds in two. The pin stores in its hole with a retaining clip, but this is the only thing I dont like about the gun. I know it will get lost easy if not secured some other way. This is something I'm going to have to think about. The safety is rounded on one side and hollow on the other. It grabs your fingertip when you put your finger on it and is very positive to flick off. The safety is also reversible for leftys. The rifle comes with two 10 round plastic Keltec mags and a sight tool.
Here are a couple of pics. These are pretty much what the rest of the targets look like as they didnt vary much for each distance.

I shot it first at 25 yards just leaning on the bench. (I forgot it had a bipod :) ) This is the first 10 round group I shot, point of aim was 6 o'clock on the bull.:
f9effd7a.jpg




The next pic is 10 rounds offhand aiming about center and just fired in a nice rhythm:
f9effd76.jpg


The next is 10 rounds at 50 yards fired off the bipod( I remembered I had one now :) ) It was shot off the bench and point of aim was again 6 o'clock on the bull.
f9effd6e.jpg


I didnt adjust the sights at all today and they pretty much shot right on where you aimed it. I was expecting recoil like an AR and it was a little stiffer. I suppose its due to the different type stock, and lighter weight. The Keltec mags fed flawlessly, the USGI M16 mags had some troubles at first. The GI mags go into the gun a little snug but lock up fine. What happened at first is the bolt carrier weas hanging up on the rear of the mag and took about 3 trys to get it to feed. This was with both mags I had with me. After the second or third try, they loaded and fed fine the rest of the time. The carrier wore spots on both mags in the same place. The shiny spot on the rear of the mag is where it was hitting in this pic:
f9effd1d.jpg


Both mags wore the same way, heavier on the right side and just slightly on the left. I guess the carrier was trimming the mag and once done, they fed fine. You will probably need to check and dedicate the mags you use, at least I'm probably going to have to. These mags were both made by the same contractor and may be another with have no trouble at all, I guess you'll just have to check them. The GI mag fits snugly in the stock and does take a little effort to get it out. Mostly because it hard to get a hold of it to pull on it. The rifle is a little muzzle heavy without a loaded mag in the stock, but balances much better with a loaded 30 rounder in there. All in all, its a pretty cool little rifle and so far, for as little as I've shot it, I like it. Its not meant to be your main gun, not that you couldnt use it that way, but I think its meant more to be a truck or boat type gun that stows out of the way but is there when you need it. I think it would make a good backpacker too. By the way, I dont know how many they have out there yet, but mine is serial number 3xx. So now I'm really scared! I hate being the guinea pig. Before you listen to the bad mouthing from the Internet, I'd check one out, and if possible shoot one. I think they have a place in the scheme of things."


One thing about the GI mags, some seem to work without trouble, my Colt mags cycle fine by hand, while others from the same maker I had trouble with hang up in the same place for about the same number of rounds but do start to feed once "broke in". I have others that still had the bolt carrier hit the top of the mag, but not as bad and did work after one or two tries. I still havent fired these yet, but I think they will most likely work if they cycle by hand, but I'll have to see for sure. As for getting them out of the stock, I put a piece of inner tube around the mag I have in the gun at the point where you can grab it through the stock. This does make it a lot easier to get the mag out.
I have since taken the rear sight off and put a Beeman SS 3 1.5x4 air rifle scope on it. The rear sight just wont fit with the scope on where I like it, but the scope has a "see thru" mount, and the channel you see thru is like a ghost ring itself, so I might still have a peep so to speak. I was going to put a dot sight on it, but I think the scope will be the better choice.

All in all so far, its a cool little rifle and we'll just have to see how it goes. My Kel Tec P32 worked great at first and then decided it didnt like me anymore, so I'm watching this one close. :)
 
Took the rifle down today - took just 2 minutes to figure it out - and replaced the old-school firing pin (bottom) with the new-style pin (top). I'm providing this picture so owners can find out which design firing pin they have in their rifle.

firing_pin_.jpg
Hi-Res
 
Hmmm, mine's numbered in the high seven-hundreds and has the old style pin...time to call Kel-Tec...
 
Dunno - we paid $439 street + shipping + FFL fees + state registration, etc.

I really like this rifle and hope it shoots well - if it shoots the same as the Mini-14 it will sell like hotcakes. The ergonomics are nice and it is very light and handy. She will be fired, soon...
 
I put another 140 rounds (Black Hills remanufactured 50gr V-Max) through my SU-16 this morning. Larry (aka, larryw) was there, and we were hoping that Steve (aka, Sven) would show up with his SU-16 to shoot.

I shot a total of fourteen ten-shot groups. The sight is a non-magnifying EOTech holographic mounted on the entire length of the Picatinny rail (see earlier photos in this thread). My first 50-yard target, using the bipod as the only means of a rest, had four ten-shot groups, measured as follows (in the order they were shot):

1 3/16"
1 3/8"
1 7/16"
2 7/16"

I then shot five ten-shot groups at 100 yards, measured as follows (again, in the order they were shot):

4 3/16"
3 13/16"
2 9/16
2 7/8"
2 1/4" (discounting one significant flier, it would have been 1 1/2")

The first two groups were shot using the bipod, and the last three were with sandbags.

My last target was five ten-shot groups, again at 50 yards, all using sandbags as a rest, and measured as follows (again, in the order they were shot):

1 3/4"
1 3/8"
1 1/2"
1"
1 7/8"

I shot a little bit better with bags compared to the bipod.

For functionality, the 10-round Kel-Tec mags have been flawless. Two came with the rifle, and I bought two more. My 30-round steel mags (look like GI mags) work 100%, too, but my 30-round Orlite ones have feeding problems.

I also like the EOTech sight a lot.
 
Ken: do you notice any wear on the back of your 30 rounder? Some folks on ktrange.com showed how the bolt was lightly scraping metal off their mags.
 
I noticed the same wear on the 30-round mags. I wasn't able to use the Orlite mags enough for them to wear at all. I didn't care too much for the Orlite mags anyway, as they won't fit into the buttstock.
 
Shot it tonight, off a rest and offhand - it's a keeper.

My guess is 2-3 MOA will be par - that's where I was today with the 'iron' sights using S&B. The front sight was easy to pick up, but the rear aperature is so open that you only have a fuzzy view of the true center.

This rifle needs optics. Dream plan:

tripower30.jpg


;)
 
That'll work. I've shot three or four Mini's & the accuracy just wasn't there for me for any of them. I have AR mags & will go look for one of these to handle.
Thanks for the range reports........
 
Looks like an interesting gun. A bit like a cross between an AR15 and a Steyr Scout.
IF the SU-16 would be available over here and IF I could somehow prove a need for one, I'd be more than willing to pay €500 for one. ;)
 
Sven, have you played with one of those yet? I've been waiting 2 years for one and forgot they were out there.
 
Where are they????????

I want a SU 16 but no one around here(San Jose) has one for a reasonable price..!!!! Sven, you gave me a number for some guy in Texas but he doesn't return my calls. Any one else no where I can get one under 500.00?
 
I want a SU 16 but no one around here(San Jose) has one for a reasonable price..!!!! Sven, you gave me a number for some guy in Texas but he doesn't return my calls. Any one else no where I can get one under 500.00?


Irvington Arms in Fremont had one for $505...that might be the best you're gonna do around here. Might wanna call and see if it's still available. Good luck!
 
I'd like to see a good scope-mounted SU-16's accuracy results on a calm day, with a good load it likes. (eg Black Hills.)

If the groups above are indicitive, I think I'll pass. But if it's really a 1-1.5MOA gun, then we may be onto something!
 
I think for what the gun is, its level of accuracy is pretty good. Its not a target rifle, or even a gun that I think you would plan on grabbing when you went hunting for that matter. I see it more as something like a souped up AR7 type gun. One you have behind the seat, or stuffed in or strapped to your backpack and is carried a lot and used little. Its just always there, out of the way and ready to go when needed. If it will shoot tight little groups all the better, but realisticly, its only got to shoot into 6-9" at 300 yards to be a practical shooter. I dont see the point of putting some big bulky scope on it. The small scopes or dot type sights seem more appropriate. Even the stock peeps work well and maybe even the best, especially for what it is.
 
Local shops.

Aside from Irvington Arms in Fremont, do any of our local gun shops in San Jose currently have one in stock?

I'd like to pick one up.

Thanks for the help.
 
I dont see the point of putting some big bulky scope on it. The small scopes or dot type sights seem more appropriate. Even the stock peeps work well and maybe even the best, especially for what it is.

I'm just pissed because what I really want is an AR, which is a 1-2MOA gun at worst, and some of the better ones are 1/2MOA all day long (some are even better than that.)

Unfortunately my commie state thinks that the SU-16 and an AR-15 are somehow so different.
 
sshhhh...

the su-16 is a user friendly, lightweight, camping/backpacking plinker (everything the mini-14 should have been) without any "evil features"...and i'm sticking with that story ;)

it just happens to be able to used the ar-15 mags which i have from before the limits on mag capacity came into effect
 
We are ALL pissed that we can't have an AR-15. But we buy these other guys just the same. The SU-16 is really fun to shoot.
 
So how accurate is this gun? Some gun shop the other day told me they are worse than a Mini 14? I haven't shot the gun but i haven't really found any one that is disappointed except the poeple who are able to get a AR-15 outside of CA. SO c'mon more range reports please.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top