Are there any glossy scopes out there?

[Grayrock]

I have a Weatherby VX that I want to put a new scope on. I want it to be glossy to match the gun. I can not seem to find any. Suggestions?

 

[Omaha-BeenGlockin]

Leupold has a few

 

[rcmodel]

Check Leupold for one.

They make gloss finish scopes in all flavors.

rc

 

[suprane]

Again, Leupold, just did a thorough search of the Leupold line and all kinds of glossy scopes available, SWFA, Ebay, Amazon, Gunbroker to name a few places. Good luck.

 

[OpticsPlanet]

Leupold has several options:

http://www.opticsplanet.com/s/leupold-gloss?cat=21

Tim G.

 

[greyling22]

burris, bushnell, nikon and tasco off er a few models, but leupold has the market mostly cornered. I thought sightron still made some, but I guess not.

here is what natchez has in stock in gloss.

http://www.natchezss.com/optics.cfm...=0&finish=2&category=20&outOfStock=0&orderBy=

 

[Grayrock]

Glad to see they have all flavors. Now I can start getting picky. I currently have a 3 - 9X 40mm. I want a more powerful magnification, a larger objective (but less than 50mm) and an illuminated reticle. I think the field just narrowed considerably. Especially if I want to keep it under $500

 

[OpticsPlanet]

Only slightly more magnification, and still a 40mm objective:

Reticle: Duplex
Objective Lens Diameter: 40 mm
Tube Diameter: 1 in
Magnification: Range 3.5 - 10 x
Finish: Gloss Finish
Code: LU-RS-VX3-35-10x40-66125
MPN: 66125
UPC: 030317661250

http://www.opticsplanet.com/leupold-vx3-35-10x40mm-rifle-scope.html

More magnification, still a 40mm, more money:
66395: Leupold VX-3 4.5-14x40 mm Long Range Gloss Finish and Duplex Reticle Rifle Scope

http://www.opticsplanet.com/leupold-vx3-45-14x40mm-long-range-riflescope.html

Mark H.

 

[Johnny_B_Goode]

The sportsmans guide has good prices on Leupold scopes. You need to be cautious when browsing the Leopold scopes at the sportsmans guide. Some of the scopes are inexpensive for a reason.

 

[Sav .250]

Check out the Natchez site. " Glossy" looking should not be a problem.