Wllm. Legrand
member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2005
- Messages
- 219
A discussion in another forum raised an issue I think about when I read posts on this and other forums.
The issue of "accuracy" in rifles and handguns is often discussed as if it were the be-all and end-all of the exercise. It is as if the accuracy of the gun is treated as the defining characteristic of shooting. Bench-rest shooting, in particular, but ISPC pistol shooting (with super-tricked out, scoped handguns one would never wear,etc.), to me, seem to me to be interesting, but tangential to the true goal of real marksmanship. Since your body is part of the shooting platform, and bench-rest shooting attempts to put the shooter's body out of the equation, it does not seem to contribute much in the way of practical marksmanship, though certain aspects DO apply (judging wind, knowing ballastics of your load as two). Using a scoped handgun, or using one of the monstrosities that are used for olympic .22 shooting also seem to be interesting "sports", but only tangentially related to practical marksmanship.
Personally, I almost never use the shooting bench for that reason. I've rarely found one in the field, therefore, unless I am sighting in a weapon, I do not use it. Those that pursue accuracy from the bench I think are missing a significant part of the Big Picture. IMHO, shooting from improvised field positions, under pressure of time, at unknown distances, and with ONE shot, is good measure of what you can do with a rifle. A lot of what I see at the range is fun, but I don't see much application to develpopment of the skills of practical marksmanship.
Am I a lone voice (other than others that have absorbed Cooper's teachings) in the wilderness?
The issue of "accuracy" in rifles and handguns is often discussed as if it were the be-all and end-all of the exercise. It is as if the accuracy of the gun is treated as the defining characteristic of shooting. Bench-rest shooting, in particular, but ISPC pistol shooting (with super-tricked out, scoped handguns one would never wear,etc.), to me, seem to me to be interesting, but tangential to the true goal of real marksmanship. Since your body is part of the shooting platform, and bench-rest shooting attempts to put the shooter's body out of the equation, it does not seem to contribute much in the way of practical marksmanship, though certain aspects DO apply (judging wind, knowing ballastics of your load as two). Using a scoped handgun, or using one of the monstrosities that are used for olympic .22 shooting also seem to be interesting "sports", but only tangentially related to practical marksmanship.
Personally, I almost never use the shooting bench for that reason. I've rarely found one in the field, therefore, unless I am sighting in a weapon, I do not use it. Those that pursue accuracy from the bench I think are missing a significant part of the Big Picture. IMHO, shooting from improvised field positions, under pressure of time, at unknown distances, and with ONE shot, is good measure of what you can do with a rifle. A lot of what I see at the range is fun, but I don't see much application to develpopment of the skills of practical marksmanship.
Am I a lone voice (other than others that have absorbed Cooper's teachings) in the wilderness?