Sorry, Tuner, but your argument is flawed in a whole bunch of ways.
First off, where do you get this idea that only boltguns are accurate? Even the AK, the least accurate of the military rifles is plenty accurate enough to kill people. Even the DMR, which usually goes to the best shot in a squad, is going to be an auto.
And where do you get this idea that the boltgun is somehow going to be a superior combatant, and that the auto shooters are just going to blaze away and stand there and not maneuver? The whole, pick your terrain, shoot and scoot is bunk. When you are at war, you often don't get to pick much of anything, and you deal with what you are dealt.
Remove mindset. Remove psychology. Because they are a moot point. A warrior is a warrior either way, and will make the best of their equipment.
So just on pure mechanics, auto vs. bolt.
Speed. Auto.
Accuracy. Wash.
Durability. Wash. (sorry auto bashers, we've been using auto rifles for 60 years now, and we've kind of got the kinks worked out. Even if you have a tiny bit of extra reliability with a Mauser, I see your Mauser and raise you a Kalashnikov. So there).
Capacity. Auto. (the whole, only hits count is wrong. Tell that to the guy with the SAW. Volume is a tactic. And once again, why do you assume that auto shooters can't hit? I've got a several thousand people with Distinguished Marksman badges earned with rack grade M-16s who might disagree with you. And also, the argument about hitting the AK guy first, so what. He brought twenty friends. Think fast).
Reload down time. Auto.
Manipulation time. Auto.
Range. Wash in the larger caliber guns. Don't belive me? What is the new US Army sniper rifle system? (SASS) Holy moly. It's an .308 auto. (SR-25).
Strangely enough, the guys that actually go to bad places and kill bad people for a living, all want auto rifles. I'm going to assume that they maybe know a little bit more about combat then most of us. I'll leave the pontificating to the folks on the internet.
And the Afghans beat the Russians for a lot more reasons than their rifles. How come a couple battalions of US Army SF was able to pacify more of the country in 9 months than the entire Russian army did in 9 years? With far fewer casualities, with more high profile targets taken down? Rifles mean about jack squat in the grand scheme of things.