Bubble Wrap Factory Upset By "Popping Noise"

Status
Not open for further replies.

41magsnub

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
1,791
Location
Missoula Montana
ok, this is kind of funny and ironic!

http://www.northjersey.com/page.php...3dnFlZUVFeXkzJmZnYmVsN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk3MjQwMDQy

Firing range has Bubble Wrap maker popping mad


Monday, December 31, 2007

By GIOVANNA FABIANO
STAFF WRITER



ELMWOOD PARK -- The maker of Bubble Wrap -- the famously addictive packaging that people love to pop, crackle and stomp on – says the popping of gunshots from a nearby police shooting range is giving its employees a headache.

Sealed Air Corp., maker of the cushioned plastic since 1957, says the noise from gunfire at the police department's firing range is "disruptive and unsettling" to its employees, according to a letter sent to borough officials.

Police Chief Don Ingrasselino says developers should have thought of that before building an office complex a few feet away from a shooting range.

Sealed Air sent the letter to the borough last month, complaining that the sound of gunfire is especially pronounced in work areas and meeting rooms on the north and west sides of the building.

The company, which moved its corporate headquarters from Saddle Brook to Riverfront Boulevard in Elmwood Park last year, asked the mayor and council to consider adjusting officers' training schedules and provide additional sound insulation for the range on nearby Slater Drive.

"This noise has been disruptive and disquieting to many of our employees," Margaret Frontera, public affairs manager for Sealed Air, wrote in the letter. Frontera could not be reached for additional comment Friday.

Ingrasselino has fired back with his own letter, arguing that the police training facility, which includes a firing range, was in that location long before Sealed Air moved in. The chief said noise concerns should have been addressed during the construction phase of the project.

"Police officers have trained at that location for over 55 years without incurring any noise complaints until now," Ingrasselino wrote.

There is no easy solution for the noise problem, Ingrasselino said, citing several concerns:

# The department must follow state mandates that require officers to pass several qualification tests a year, proving their proficiency in shooting handguns, rifles and shotguns.

# If officers were forced to shoot on weekends, the borough would incur thousands of dollars of overtime costs.

# Erecting an indoor shooting range at the current site would cost nearly $1 million, and relocating the training program to Bergen County's facility would cost the borough $250,000 annually.

"Getting 45 officers down to shoot four times a year with rotating schedules is a nightmare as it is, so making them shoot only at certain times is not feasible," Ingrasselino said.

"All of a sudden, there's a development within feet of the range and now there's a problem," Ingrasselino said, adding, "When they were developing that, they should have addressed that."

Ingrasselino said the borough has no plans to make adjustments at the range, and officials have not received any follow-up letters from Sealed Air.

Also known for producing Jiffy bags and Cryovac packaging, Sealed Air is best known for Bubble Wrap, which has inspired dozens of Web sites dedicated to the practice of popping the plastic bubbles on the packaging and creating a loud noise. Sealed Air has even created BubbleWrapFun.com, a site dedicated to amusing uses of Bubble Wrap, including a bubble-popping game.

E-mail: [email protected]

7240042
 
Bubble Wrap, get the hell out. You signed away all rights to complain when you moved in.
 
Oh the ironing! :)

What is it with people who move near a shooting range then complain about the noise? The cop said the range has been there for 55 years! I agree with him, Sealed Air should've been more diligent when they were looking for a place to build.

Case in point: I live about 3 blocks from a railroad crossing. I don't like the stupid whistle, but I'm not petitioning city hall or BNSF to move the railroad.
 
A few feet from a firing range? That's a really dumb thing for an apparently anti company to do. Guess their management has bigger problems, like inventing something that can't be replaced by DIRT.
 
I'm not one for proposing new laws to handle isolated incidents, but I believe we need one for this. There needs to be something on the federal level to protect shooting ranges, that require potential buyers and builders to be informed whenever they want to move within so many feet or miles of a designated range that was there more than a year before they moved in. And any potential mover has to sign a waver stating that they understand that there's a gun range nearby and that they'll have to live with the sound of gunfire, and that they give up their ability to bring a complaint or lawsuit based on the sound of gunfire or the proximity of gunfire to their home.
 
The concerned employees can fix this problem with two things, bubble wrap and duct tape...

Simply wrap the bubble wrap around their heads and fasten with duct tape...

See innovations are everywhere!
 
Unfortunately, this is happening all over the country as firing ranges and gun clubs are being driven out of business by yuppies moving into new developments.
 
its not just shooting ranges, rail roads and airports. Seem people are just idiots when it comes to things like that. Whats worse is in most case there is wavers in the paper work you fill out when your buying said property...
 
Police Chief Don Ingrasselino says developers should have thought of that before building an office complex a few feet away from a shooting range.

That just about sums it up right there.
 
People don't want to be responsible for their lack of foresight. This is just another example.

Years ago I was involved in constructing a factory on a piece of suburban land that had (a) been zoned Industrial for 35 years; (b) been extensively quarried, so that it rather resembled the Sonora desert; and (c) had for at least 15 years had the foundation of a factory that was never built as its most priminent landmark.

When a new company bought the land and proposed to build their factory on it, the guy who had recently bought the house across the street objected. Vehemently. He tried everything, right down to the sob stories about displacing all the "wildlife" that called this "habitat" home. (About all that lived there was crows, and the farmer next door had an automatic shotgun boomer thingie to keep them out of his crops.) The guy was so bad about it that after he lost all the zoning hearings and the plan was approved, he would sneak out at night and sabotage the construction equipment.

All because he was too lazy and/or too stupid to look at a map and see that the empty space across the street was zoned Industrial at the time he bought his house.
 
A couple of years ago, a real estate agent came to our local gun club to ask that no one shoot on Saturday mornings for awhile. That's when she showed clients the new housing development going in down the road, and she didn't want us to "scare away" her clients!

Of course we still get complaints from the housing development that built at the end of our rifle range (the range was there years and years before the development).
 
A couple of years ago, a real estate agent came to our local gun club to ask that no one shoot on Saturday mornings for awhile. That's when she showed clients the new housing development going in down the road, and she didn't want us to "scare away" her clients!


thats when its time to bring out the loudest gun you own and shoot it, alot. :D
 
Of course if this was a "civilian" shooting range, the range would have been forced closed and the local news media wouldn't say a darn thing about it.


thats when its time to bring out the loudest gun you own and shoot it, alot. :D
Exactly. I'd WANT to frighten the yuppies away because if you don't they'll end up shutting you down.

Now if I was looking at a house and heard gunshots and when asked my Realtor would sheepishly say "well there's a shooting range right over there" The first word that would come out of my mouth would likely be SOLD!
 
if i was that close to a shooting range i would beg for them to let me shoot there sometimes :p
 
Reddbecca said:
I'm not one for proposing new laws to handle isolated incidents, but I believe we need one for this. There needs to be something on the federal level to protect shooting ranges, that require potential buyers and builders to be informed whenever they want to move within so many feet or miles of a designated range that was there more than a minute before they moved in. And any potential mover has to sign a waver stating that they understand that there's a gun range nearby and that they'll have to live with the sound of gunfire, and that they give up their ability to bring a complaint or lawsuit based on the sound of gunfire or the proximity of gunfire to their home.

Fixed it for you. ;)
 
I have great respect for anyone who can be around that much bubble wrap and retain any self control. I certainly could not, I'd "pop" more inventory than I'd produce! :evil:
 
TexasRifleman said:
Police Chief Don Ingrasselino says developers should have thought of that before building an office complex a few feet away from a shooting range.
I like him. A lot.
While I agree with his statement, I can't imagine that Chief Ingrasselino is all that pro gun, or that he'd stand up for a private or otherwise "civilian" shooting range under those same circumstances (I don't know the man personally, but I doubt one rises to the level of Police Chief anywhere in New Jersey without being a committed police stater).



I'm not one for proposing new laws to handle isolated incidents, but I believe we need one for this. There needs to be something on the federal level to protect shooting ranges, that require potential buyers and builders to be informed whenever they want to move within so many feet or miles of a designated range that was there more than a year before they moved in. And any potential mover has to sign a waver stating that they understand that there's a gun range nearby and that they'll have to live with the sound of gunfire, and that they give up their ability to bring a complaint or lawsuit based on the sound of gunfire or the proximity of gunfire to their home.
Simple property rights should protect the range.

This is one point where I wish ole Thomas Jefferson hadn't got so poetic in his writing of the Declaration. He paraphrased Locke saying that "...they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." When Locke's original statement was "...Life, Liberty and Property."

"The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God ... anarchy and tyranny commence. PROPERTY MUST BE SECURED OR LIBERTY CANNOT EXIST"

-John Adams
 
This last year anti's went after the Boy Scouts in Colorado. I'm 57 and I shot there when I was in scouts (Way back when;) )
http://www.newsdaily.com/Quirks/UPI-1-20071116-12415100-bc-us-scoutsuit.xml

DENVER, Nov. 16 (UPI) -- A group of Colorado residents tired of noise from a Boy Scouts target shooting range shot back by filing a court complaint.

In the suit filed in Denver District Court Elbert County residents said the Peaceful Valley Scout Ranch "has been anything but peaceful," the Rocky Mountain News reported Friday. The suit names Colorado Clays, a company that runs shotgun target shooting event, and the Denver Area Council of the Boy Scouts of America.

The lawsuit, filed earlier this week, came as the Boy Scouts seek a permit from the Elbert County Commission to hold events at the shooting range annually from May to October.

Neighbors started complaining in May after a weekend sporting clay shooting event, saying the loud noise left their ears ringing. Residents said the Scouts didn't notify them that fundraising events would take place.

"We just wanted to put a stop to it now," said Lorri Salyards, a spokeswoman for the law firm representing the residents. "It's disturbing because homeowners can't live peacefully."

Copyright 2007 by United Press International. All Rights Reserved.
 
People out here move next to the airport and complain about the planes. They move next to the racetrack and complain about the noise. Now they don't allow top fuel drag cars anymore and have to muffle our race cars down to 103db. It happens with ranges here too. People need to think about those things before they move or build if they are bothered by it. Jets flying overhead would bother me. I love racing but living next to the track might bother me at times. My solution? I DIDN'T MOVE TO THOSE AREAS! It's not rocket science. Think about why the property value is so low before you drop the cash!
 
"We just wanted to put a stop to it now," said Lorri Salyards, a spokeswoman for the law firm representing the residents. "It's disturbing because homeowners can't live peacefully."

Lucky she didn't buy property in the flight path of Denver Int'l...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top