CA: SB489: The Further Deterioration of the 2nd Amendment

Status
Not open for further replies.

shooterx10

Member
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
159
You think the Smart Gun Law in Jersey is S**T, look at this stupid bill!

SB489: The Further Deterioration of the 2nd Amendment
by Jennifer Freeman



The California legislature is well on its way to passing SB489. If enacted into law, SB489 would deem "unsafe" any semi-automatic handgun that does not have a "loaded chamber" indicator and "magazine disconnect" feature on it. That covers basically every semi-automatic handgun in existence today.

One might infer that the intent of this bill is to prevent "accidental shootings" from occuring by handlers of semi-automatic handguns who claim that they thought the firearm was unloaded.

Keep in mind that in order for such "accidental shootings" to occur, three things have to happen. 1) The firearm must be loaded. 2) The operator of the firearm must point it at a person. 3) The operator of the firearm must pull the trigger.

Any person who breaks all three of the basic safety rules -- 1) Treat every firearm as if it were loaded; 2) Always keep your firearm pointed in the safest possible direction; 3) Do not put your finger on the trigger until ready to shoot; -- is unsafe. Repeat. Any PERSON who fails to follow the three basic rules of firearm safety is unsafe.

And yet, our government would have you believe that it is the firearm that is unsafe. :cuss:

In doing so, the government is taking away personal responsibility for ones' actions and shifting the blame on an inanimate object. An inanimate object that represents one of the most sacred rights we have -- the right to self defense.

The semi-automatic handgun has been available in its current form for approximately one hundred years. As such, this type of handgun has been owned and operated by thousands, perhaps millions, of responsible, law-abiding people. People who hold a high regard for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And yet, in these modern -- progressive -- times, our government is seeking to deem these symbols of liberty and self-determination as unsafe.

Shifting blame, refusing to accept accountability, and creating new, useless laws are concepts that politicians understand very well. This should come as no surprise since we keep electing them. We need to make a determination, however, as to how far we are willing to let politicians trample on our rights.

If we allow SB489 to pass, we are telling our government that we cannot responsibly handle our own semi-automatic handguns. If that is the case, could the government also determine that we cannot responsibly handle any firearm? That we cannot responsibly handle any self-defense situation? Can we even be trusted to vote responsibly?

Americans have suffered enough from the "good intentions" of gun control. It's time for our government to stop this progressive deterioration of our Second Amendment rights and leave it to Americans to behave responsibly as we have done for hundreds of years.



SB489 passed the California Senate and could be heard in the Assembly any day. If it passes the Assembly, it goes to the Governor's desk to be signed into law or vetoed. Click here to contact your Assembly Member.




copyright © 2001-2003

Here is the link.
 
It just passed the assembly

It just passed in the assembly (my guy voted noe:)) It is going back to the State Senate then to Red Davis.

I called my assemblyman to ask him to vote the way he did, then thanked him for his vote even though we didn't win.
 
...our government would have you believe that it is the firearm that is unsafe.

Leftist extremist so-called "gun control" laws have nothing to do with safety, crime, or criminals. Their only purpose is to make it more difficult, more expensive, or simply impossible for commoners to exercise our Second Amendment civil rights.
 
Leftist extremist so-called "gun control" laws have nothing to do with safety, crime, or criminals. Their only purpose is to make it more difficult, more expensive, or simply impossible for commoners to exercise our Second Amendment civil rights.

That's the most intellegent comment I've heard today.
 
So where was everybody...

... when this bill was being voted on?

This seems like a classic case of us gun folk not letting the pols know where we stand.

I mean, this is a stupid law. The only reason for it is to keep themselves in office.

I really don't think it has any thing to do with anything as high falutin' as pols giving a rat's tuchus (that's a hard "ch") about our 2nd amendment rights. Which they don't.

It's just greed and power.

And knowing that gun owners will just take it. Lying down. Standing up. Any which way.

Anyway, the good news is I just got my new Kahr K9 Elite.

einstein
 
Does someone if this bill actually passed? I've heard conflicting stories how it was only granted a reconsidering but not voted on.

NRA CA Members' Council isn't helpful: It says it passed the assembly and then says the report of its passage is false.
 
This is the current status as of 2:40am PDT September 5 2003

CURRENT BILL STATUS


MEASURE : S.B. No. 489
AUTHOR(S) : Scott (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Koretz)
(Coauthors: Senators Kuehl, Perata, and Romero)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Chan, Levine, Longville,
and Lowenthal).
TOPIC : Firearms: chamber load indicators and magazine
disconnected mechanisms.
HOUSE LOCATION : ASM
+LAST AMENDED DATE : 08/18/2003


TYPE OF BILL :
Active
Non-Urgency
Non-Appropriations
Majority Vote Required
State-Mandated Local Program
Fiscal
Non-Tax Levy

LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 09/05/2003
LAST HIST. ACTION : Reconsideration refused. To Senate.

TITLE : An act to amend Secions 12126, 12130, and 12132 of the
penal Code, relating to firearms.
 
So where was everybody...

... when this bill was being voted on?

Where were you? ;) CRPA has been following SB489 in their newsletter, THR members have been posting on it. It's sad that one needs to check up weekly to see what twisted ideas CA lawmakers are coming up with - for the children.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top