Lobotomy Boy,
Please consider whether your resentment at the Monica scandal might be blinding you. Having come of age during the Clinton administration, and now witnessing the fear, hatred and distrust aimed at Bush, I am willing to concede that I may have been too harsh on Clinton myself. For the sake of argument, let's agree that Clinton's sexual indiscretions should have been ignored, the way past White House philandering probably has been. We are still left with the fact that a President took sexual advantage of a young woman in his office. A hunting accident doesn't even come close to that. One is a case of poor judgement while on his own time, the other were deliberate acts of sexual immorality, marital infidelity and abuse of power which took place in the White House itself. Everybody knows it, which is why the press, which despises Cheney, is more interested in going after phony charges of a "cover-up." And let's not forget that Cheney's resignation was demanded, by the chairman of the DNC, no less.
Even if the VP was drunk, you would think Wittington would have known that before he made the decision to keep hunting with him. So if Cheney wanted to sober up before he talked to the cops? Powerful politician gets away with minor indiscretion. Wouldn't be the first time. Still not as bad as Monicagate. Face it.