I think price is only part of kel-tec's success, I think the rest of the story is told in them doing something different. How many people buy the sub2000 because it looks neat, or the plr16 because of the same reason? Is the p3at a success because its cheap or because its the only super lightweight polymer locked breech .380 in existence? If they can put their engineering skills to use making some equally innovative higher end weapons I think it might open up a new market to them and improve their image.Am I the only one that thinks Kel Tec would me making a business strategy mistake trying to push $1500-$2000 firearms? They have positioned themselves as an industry leader in the low cost niche of the firearms industry. By trying to differentiate their product line with higher dollar items they risk loosing part of that marketshare to other companies dealing in the low cost quality firearms. To be sucessful they would have to make up for this loss by gaining ground in the higher priced market segments. I simply see the current competition in $1500+ military sporting rifles too much for Kel Tec to compete without completely revamping their brand image.
Century has a Galil for around $800
these are the two that i am most interested in right now! thanks again! man i wish i could have been there.Magpull Masada. .223 rifle. It is THE AWESOME. You guys that want a civvie SCAR, this is actually cooler. I'm going to buy 20 of them.
American made Augs. Better than the original, and you don't have to deal with the Austrians.
That is one odd ejection mechanism. Why would they do that?