Curious about 9x18 stopping power.

Status
Not open for further replies.

wbond

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
434
Hello. I curious about 9x18 stopping power. I'm not sure anyone knows or has any data, but opinions are interesting too. Please give your opinions, experiences, agree with, or debunk what I've said below.

Below are second hand facts and opinions to consider before answering:

=====================================

The .32 ACP has or should decent 3 shot stop power. I base this on it's one shot stop capability, which I don't remember for sure, but I think was around 40%. However, multiply that by 3 and you are well over 100%. I think this applies to warmer climates only. Cold climates mean thick wool and other winter coats that might act almost like a bullet resistant vest to a .32 ACP.

The Paraguay Police and Military reputedly use .32 ACP CZ-83s and .32 Mag Ruger SP101s as standard issue weapons. Supposedly their laws limit handguns to .32 caliber or smaller. I've heard the police and military have a policy of triple taps. This probably works pretty well in the warm climate where everyone is wearing a thin shirt or less. Also, people bleed more in hot weather. In a cold climate, with people wearing heavy coats, I don't think you could rely on 3 shot stops.

The Ruger SP101 however, is an entirely different matter in .32 Magnum. I think the .32 Mag packs a good wallup with good penetration. Not a powerhouse round, but no wussy either. It probably has one shot stop ability as good as, or maybe better than, a .38 special. I don't think any winter coat is going to stop a .32 Mag. Also, if one shot wouldn't do it with .32 Mag, I'm sure two shots would.

======================================

Many of the police forces and/or civilians in the rest of S. America and Europe use the .380 ACP for standard carry.

Everyone knows a .380 is better than a .32 ACP, but probably not as good as a .32 Mag. The 1 shot stop capablity of the .380 is questionable. However, the .380 has reliable 2 shot stop capability, as long as they're not wearing a heavy coat.

======================================

Where does that leave the 9x18 coming out of a 3.8" barrel? I can guess as follows:

First of all, notice that I said the .380 is a good 2 shot stopper IF THEY ARE NOT WEARING A HEAVY COAT. The 9x18 has enough extra punch that it could probably, in my opinion, defeat any winter coat. Probably. I'm sure the Ruskies must have thought about this when they designed it. If one shot of 9x18 hollow point wouldn't do it, I'm sure a second would.

Now let's be more specific about 9x18 power levels.

The standard is what the Ruskies, Bulgys, and East Germs used in their true Makarov pistols.

The Check (spelling?) CZ-P82 and P83 were designed to shoot 20% more powerful 9x18 ammo, according to CZ and Check claims. The Check military ammo was (supposedly) loaded 20% hotter for use in P-82s and later P83s. This would be +P+ ammo, if the Checks used this term. They just called it Check military ammo and it was understood that is was 20% hotter than regular 9x18 Mak ammo.

Regular 9x18 Mak ammo is equivalent to a .380 +P. This is what is intended for Rusky, Bulgy, East Germs, and other true Makarovs. You might be able to shoot 9x18 +P safely in these guns, but I'm not sure.

The CZ-P82 and P83 can easily handle a steady diet of 9x18 +P+ because that is what it they were designed for.

======================================

Now back to stopping power: Since the standard Makarvo 9x18 ammo is like a .380 +P, we must conclude it's slightly better than .380, but not much. However, every little bit helps a lot when you're borderline for stopping power.

I'd say a standard 9x18 in hollow point should be a reliable two shot stopper, but can't be relied on for one shot stops. However, two shot stops are good enough for me. Unfortunatlely, a thick winter coat would call the two shot stops into question.

Now look at a CZ-P82 or P83 and the ammo it is intended to shoot all the time: Check ammo, which is 9x18 +P+ ammo. That helps a lot. If you can get this ammo in hollow point, you'd have a decent 1 shot stopper with power half way between .380 and 9mm Parabellum. I think 2 shots would do it for sure.

Therefore, I conclude that a CZ-83 shooting 9x18 +P+ hollow points is a good defense round that offers a decent chance of a one shot stop and a near certainty of a two shot stop (assuming good bullet placement). I believe this would be true regardless of winter coats or not.

Also, the CZ-82 and CZ-83 can easily handle a steady diet of +P+ 9x18 because that's what they were made for.

=======================================

Lastly, look at the super hot loaded Mak 9x18 PMM ammo made for the new high capacity, high powered Makarov PMM. The 9x18 PMM ammo is 70% more powerful than standard 9x18 ammo, which is 50% more than a P82 or P83 can handle.

The Makarvov PMM ammo is ballistically the same or very similar to 9MM +P Parabellum. So there is no need to guess about it's perfomance. Don't ever put 9x18 PMM ammo into an old style Makarov or a CZ-83 because it's way to powerful for those guns and I think it would be VERY dangerous.

The only gun you can put 9x18 PMM ammo into is a Makarov PMM pistol. Don't try putting this ammo into anything else.

=========================================

Your thoughts on 9x18 stopping power, or lack of it?
 
Stopping power is a myth.
The "one shot stop" is a farce.
Shot placement is king!!
These truths are independent of caliber!!
The lowly .25acp will stop (kill) if it is put in the right spot!!
My CCW instructor taught us to "shoot and keep shooting" until the threat went away!!
 
i prefer to think that people (and cover) have stopping-power, while bullets have going-power (aka momentum). some people (e.g. those who frequent mcdonalds or BBQ pits) may have more stopping-power than others.
 
I don't think I would run hollow point in 9x18, the penetration just isn't very comforting. The Wolf 109 gr FMJ gets 21 inches IIRC, and is my preffered carry round.
 
I use Barnaul JHP's in mine but it still is not equal to the 9MM which I personally consider to be the minimum I would carry for SD.
 
Thought I certainly wouldn't recommend the lowly .32acp for defense, I have been known to depend on a P32 on particularly warm days.
I won't qoute any "one shot stops" as I believe they're somewhat misleading (despite having greatly enjoyed Marshal and Sanows publications).
And for the record, three rounds that are said to have a "40% OSS" shouldn't be expected to offer a 120% of incapacitation. ;) Though interesting on paper, that's not suitable for the real world.

However, I will say that if pushed into a defensive role, an assailant will become much more docile after receiving a couple 71gr FMJs to the "snot locker".

As for the 9x18, I found Silverbears in 115gr flavor are the cat's meow out of my Makarov with heavier spring installed (21 pound Wolff spring if I'm not mistaken).

However, as wisely pointed out, shot placement is the absolutely vital and key to effectiveness. A flesh wound from a .454 Casull, regardless of how nasty it may appear, has nothing on a 9x18 to the noggin'.
 
I agree w/much of what's already been posted. No such thing as "stopping power". Sufficient penetration and shot placement, nothing else matters. I have a '62 EG Mak for my bedside/CCW piece and use the Silver Bear 115gr JHP @1,000fps (low-end 9mm peformance, 380+P can't touch it) for the current best combination of expansion & penetration. The lighter weight 9x18 JHP's don't have sufficient penetration IMHO.
Tomac
 
What denfoote said.

Shot-placement and bullet penetration rule in handgun killing. I've worked on 150 of them, either as primary counsel, a PI (when I was in law school), or a consultant.

The 9x18 Mak works. I've worked on about 5 killings in which it was used. You hit the right place, the guy goes down. Just like with a .45. The 9x18 Mak seems completely capable of sufficient accuracy and penetration to put a man down.
 
placement, pennetration, and expantion are the key to the shot.
think of yer pistol like a hole puncher.:rolleyes:
 
Caliber is secondary to shot placement, but placement is not guaranteed.

So what can one do?

Practice, use as high caliber as comfortable with, have big magazine capacity, shoot until the BG stops.

As simple as that. Comparing grains, fps, etc. is purely academic next to the above simple rules.
 
well I could be all fancy like those that posted before me, BUT here at Azrael's we have a simple formula for "stopping power"...

Shoot whatever it is that you are shooting LOTs of times in the face...Repeatedly...Shoot it SOME MORE...If undecided?? yup SHOOT SOME MORE!!!..if it doesnt move then it is stopped...See?? works like a charm..

OR for those that arent educated in the Southern Baptist Shooting Method (SBSMtm), then I will make it a bit simpler..

If they are worth shooting once, they are prolly worth shooting seveal times, until they stop doing whatever it is that you decided to shoot them for?? see what I mean?? Stopping power only matters to the guy that just got shot..It is up to him whether or not he is gonna stop..Not some magic formula.:rolleyes:

easy stuff


unpleasant dreams :evil:
 
Plan to use 9x18 +P+ hollow point, if I can find it.

The CZ-83 9x18 is designed to shoot 20% hotter ammo than standard 9x18 ammo. The Checkoslovaks (spelling?) use 20% hotter 9x18 ammo than the Ruskies. The CZ-83 is therefore more potent than a Makarov, if I can get hotter 9x18 ammo.

Plan to use 9x18 +P+ hollow point, if I can find it, or hotter. Of course the limiting factor will probably be my recoil sensitivity (hand held together by 4 screws).

Somebody (forgot who) makes a really hot loaded 9x18 cal. 115 grain hollow point that goes about 1050 fps. I think that would do it. It's a lot hotter than a .380.

Scottmkiv said:
I don't think I would run hollow point in 9x18, the penetration just isn't very comforting. The Wolf 109 gr FMJ gets 21 inches IIRC, and is my preffered carry round.
 
Ya, that's the 115 gr I want to try.

Ya, that's the 115 gr I want to try. I probably won't need to modify the CZ-83 at all because it's already made to shoot 20% more powerful 9x18 ammo than a Makarov. So my stock recoil spring should be fine.

The Checkoslovaks (spelling?) claim their 9x18 ammo is 20% more powerful than Rusky, and that the CZ-82 and CZ-83 are made for this 20% hotter 9x18 ammo. So your recommended hot 9x18 ammo should be perfect, if my recoil sensitive hand can take it. If my hand (held together by 4 screws) can't handle the hotter 9x18 ammo, then I can shoot regular 9x18, or .380 in my .380 CZ-83.

Snowdog said:
Thought I certainly wouldn't recommend the lowly .32acp for defense, I have been known to depend on a P32 on particularly warm days.
I won't qoute any "one shot stops" as I believe they're somewhat misleading (despite having greatly enjoyed Marshal and Sanows publications).
And for the record, three rounds that are said to have a "40% OSS" shouldn't be expected to offer a 120% of incapacitation. ;) Though interesting on paper, that's not suitable for the real world.

However, I will say that if pushed into a defensive role, an assailant will become much more docile after receiving a couple 71gr FMJs to the "snot locker".

As for the 9x18, I found Silverbears in 115gr flavor are the cat's meow out of my Makarov with heavier spring installed (21 pound Wolff spring if I'm not mistaken).

However, as wisely pointed out, shot placement is the absolutely vital and key to effectiveness. A flesh wound from a .454 Casull, regardless of how nasty it may appear, has nothing on a 9x18 to the noggin'.
 
If you're expecting the JHP uniformity typical of US-made JHPs, you might find the 115gr Silverbears a bit crude. If you're looking for decent accuracy, reliability and positive real-world expansion, you'll likely enjoy them.
I believe they still sell for $5.50/50, so your defensive fodder could double for range ammo.

Here's a previous thread on the 115gr Silverbears:

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=141174&highlight=115gr+silverbear
 
I agree about shooting a larger caliber, if possible. I'd rather shoot a .40 cal Glock 23 like I used to.

The problem is my left hand is now held together by 4 screws and my right wrist fused. So I'm VERY recoil sensitive. I can handle .380 in my .380 CZ-83.

I'm hoping to handle 9x18 in my 9x18 CZ-83 with those hotter 115 grain loads. I don't know if I can handle the hotter 115 gr 9x18 or not, but I'll find out. I don't have the luxury of getting a more powerful cartridge than that. I might not even be able to go over .380.

Note I own two CZ-83s: one in .380 and another in 9x18. Haven't picked up the 9x18 from store yet.

Therefore, I'd like to get an idea of how much confidence I can have in the capabilities I do have. I am a decent shot, especially considering my wrist is fused at an angle that does not line up properly for sighting. I can hit a dinner plate almost every time at 25 yards. At 10 yards I can hit a pie plate (4") almost every time. I'm not as good as I once was of course, but still good enough I think.

I just wanted some idea of what a 9x18 hot load could do. I might have to stick to .380. We'll see. Thanks.

CAnnoneer said:
Caliber is secondary to shot placement, but placement is not guaranteed.

So what can one do?

Practice, use as high caliber as comfortable with, have big magazine capacity, shoot until the BG stops.

As simple as that. Comparing grains, fps, etc. is purely academic next to the above simple rules.
 
The_Antibubba said:
One big bonus of the Makarov is how stubbornly reliable it is. If you need it, it will work.

In one way or another... it's all steel... so if you shoot it dry... you can always club someone with it...

Who's going to win a pistol whipping fight? The guy with the Mak or the guy with the glock? :D
 
Good point actually. The CZ-83 is also all steel and a tad heavier.

NoScreenName said:
In one way or another... it's all steel... so if you shoot it dry... you can always club someone with it...

Who's going to win a pistol whipping fight? The guy with the Mak or the guy with the glock? :D
 
You could try a Browning Hi-Power. All steel, recoil-operated instead of blowback, and 9mm. Standard pressure 147 grain loads will usually have less felt recoil than 124 or 115s. Going by the empty w/magazine weights, 147 grain 9x19mm through a BHP only has 25% more recoil impulse than 109 gr FMJ through a 9x18mm CZ-83. Though regular 109 gr 9mm Makarov ammo produces almost 25% more recoil over .380 to begin with.

You could also see if you can track down a 9mm 1911. The 1911's weight will cut the recoil down to just a hair under 9mm Mak.

Raw numbers:
.380 CZ-83: 7.54 fps
9x18 CZ-83: 9.31 fps
9mm BHP: 11.57 fps
9mm 1911: 9.26 fps

Though the (approximate) felt recoils, based on acceleration instead of impulse, are a little different. The 9x18 CZ-83 definitely loses.
.380 CZ-83: 9.2
9x18 CZ-83: 12.6
9mm BHP: 10.6
9mm 1911: 6.5

I don't know whether your fused wrist will make you more sensitive to impulse or acceleration. Most people notice the recoil acceleration more than the recoil velocity.

In terms of "stopping power," the approximate amount of tissue each is capable of crushing, in a frontal torso shot is:
.380 95 gr FMJ: 12.3 grams
.380 90 gr XTP: 14.1 grams
9x18 109 gr FMJ: 12.9 grams
9x18 115 gr HP: 14.3 grams
9mm 147 gr HP: 30.2 grams

According to Duncan MacPherson, around 30-40 grams is the absolute bare minimum to quickly incapacitate a human with lung shots.
 
wbond said:
The CZ-83 9x18 is designed to shoot 20% hotter ammo than standard 9x18 ammo. The Checkoslovaks (spelling?) use 20% hotter 9x18 ammo than the Ruskies. The CZ-83 is therefore more potent than a Makarov, if I can get hotter 9x18 ammo.

Plan to use 9x18 +P+ hollow point, if I can find it, or hotter. Of course the limiting factor will probably be my recoil sensitivity (hand held together by 4 screws).

Somebody (forgot who) makes a really hot loaded 9x18 cal. 115 grain hollow point that goes about 1050 fps. I think that would do it. It's a lot hotter than a .380.

I've got a 9x18 CZ-83 and several Makarovs.
IMO the CZ is no stronger than the Mak and I wouldn't trust shooting my hot reloads in the CZ, that I normally shoot in the Mak (with a 21 pound recoil spring).

The normal 9x18 factory load does 1,000fps with bullets weighing 90 to 115 grain.
That means CZ claims that the 83 is designed to use (and they load) 9x18 ammo in the 1,200fps range. I'll believe it when I see it.

If anyone knows of any factory 9x18 ammo that does over 1,000-1,050fps I'd like to know about it. I'll buy a whole bunch.:)
To my knowledge there's no 9x18 +P ammo.

I and another poster, "catbird", have been working on 9x18 hand loads and we have gotten in the 1100+fps range with light bullets, 90-95gr, and that's pushing it.
We haven't been able to test hand loads with 115 grain bullets because there aren't any (.364) available for hand loading.

Bond, with your hand problem, if you could get a hot load you might not be able to handle it.
The Mak is still 100% reliable with even a 21 pound recoil spring and that helps to reduce the "kick".
Maybe the CZ will be also, I haven't tried it.

You might consider hand loading light (700fps) loads for practice.
Lead bullets and JHP reloads are very accurate.:)

The hottest factory load I know of is Silver Bear/Brown Bear 115gr JHP at about 1,000fps.
 
Thanks for the info.

Thanks very much for the information. You are right. My hand might not take it. I intend to work up gradually. If a heavier recoil spring dampens recoil (I didn't know that), then maybe I should experiment with heavier springs to see what's the heaviest that is reliable with the 115 grain silver bears. What do you think of that idea?

Also, with regard to what power ammo the CZ-82 and CZ-83 are made for: that claim was made by some place called "Guns of the world". That place said that CZ claims that their military ammo is/was 20% hotter than standard 9x18 ammo and that the CZ 82 and 83 were made for that hotter ammo.

So CZ didn't directly claim that to me. Rather this other website stated that CZ claims this.

M2 Carbine said:
I've got a 9x18 CZ-83 and several Makarovs.
IMO the CZ is no stronger than the Mak and I wouldn't trust shooting my hot reloads in the CZ, that I normally shoot in the Mak (with a 21 pound recoil spring).

The normal 9x18 factory load does 1,000fps with bullets weighing 90 to 115 grain.
That means CZ claims that the 83 is designed to use (and they load) 9x18 ammo in the 1,200fps range. I'll believe it when I see it.

If anyone knows of any factory 9x18 ammo that does over 1,000-1,050fps I'd like to know about it. I'll buy a whole bunch.:)
To my knowledge there's no 9x18 +P ammo.

I and another poster, "catbird", have been working on 9x18 hand loads and we have gotten in the 1100+fps range with light bullets, 90-95gr, and that's pushing it.
We haven't been able to test hand loads with 115 grain bullets because there aren't any (.364) available for hand loading.

Bond, with your hand problem, if you could get a hot load you might not be able to handle it.
The Mak is still 100% reliable with even a 21 pound recoil spring and that helps to reduce the "kick".
Maybe the CZ will be also, I haven't tried it.

You might consider hand loading light (700fps) loads for practice.
Lead bullets and JHP reloads are very accurate.:)

The hottest factory load I know of is Silver Bear/Brown Bear 115gr JHP at about 1,000fps.
 
I have tried Barnaul, Wolf, and S&B 9x18 ammo in my Mak. The Barnaul JHP shoots best and is my carry ammo when I carry it. I don't like Wolf and don't shoot that crap in nothing but my SKS's or Ak's. I had 2 malfunctions with the S&B and don't buy that any more either. Haven't tried Silver Bear yet but see no reason to when Barnaul works so good for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top