Why is it B.S.?Do you guys mind taking this b.s. somewhere else.
Seems to me that is exactly what you are getting. Pros and cons about a wide range of choices. Everyone thinks his choice is the best and everyone else's is inferior. Arguments are presented, pro and con, for many different brands. None of them are perfect. Your choice should be influenced by many different criteria: Price, reputation, wait time, customer service should something go wrong... are just a few.I am looking for honest pros and cons
Do you guys mind taking this b.s. somewhere else. I am looking for honest pros and cons so I can wisely spend my hard earned cash. You all have vastly more knowledge on the subject than me and looking for that knowledge.
I'm not sure what you appear to be upset about. Both of those members are offering exactly what you are asking for...and are doing so from points of wide experience as opposed to narrow focus opinionsDo you guys mind taking this b.s. somewhere else. I am looking for honest pros and cons so I can wisely spend my hard earned cash.
I have an issue with any 1911 that requires X amount of ammo to be shot in order to break the pistol in. Some have put too much into thinking that a super tight slide to frame fit makes a 1911 more accurate. While slide to frame fit has some effect, the barrel to slide and barrel bushing fit is what really affects accuracy. I have proven this with the old battle rattle 1911's we were issued in the Army.I have had more than a few heated words with Les over this. I think it is not wise to build a pistol so tight that the average person can barely rack the slide and is told he has to shoot hundreds of dollars worth of ammo through the gun to "break it in."
my experience with Les Baer… none.. except I have handles a dozen different one at gun shops. Everything from used old guns, unfired old guns, new guns .My experience with Les Baer pistols is that they are built well with quality components, and they run.
I picked up my first Baer about 15 years ago. That choice was made because back then, Wilson was cutting corners on components by using MIM parts. I'm not going to get into the pros and cons of MIM but if I am going to pay premium prices, I want premium parts used in the build.
I won't get into the conversations that I have had with industry experts in the know, but Wilson seems a lot more about marketing than they do function.
I was very much in this school when I first became interested in higher grade 1911s, likely influenced by Bullseye shooters at the range I frequented....this was before the days of the internet.Some have put too much into thinking that a super tight slide to frame fit makes a 1911 more accurate. While slide to frame fit has some effect, the barrel to slide and barrel bushing fit is what really affects accuracy.
I was very much in this school when I first became interested in higher grade 1911s, likely influenced by Bullseye shooters at the range I frequented....this was before the days of the internet.
More research lead me to discover that accuracy was more a function of the fit between the barrel and the slide...at least as long as the sights were mounted on the slide.
More research and speaking to folks who built higher end 1911s then taught me that ultimate tightness of the slide to the frame only had to exist when the pistol was in battery. That is why most high end 1911s have built-up rails at the end of their travel. Out of battery, the slide glides on the rails for increased reliability and reduced wear. It's a lot more work to produce, so you won't see it in lessor builds...what you'll see is the tight fitting of the slide to the rails which most folks think reflects higher quality work
Exactly right. I have seen guns with looseness in the F to S fit that were very accurate. Barrel lockup is the key.While slide to frame fit has some effect, the barrel to slide and barrel bushing fit is what really affects accuracy.
It's because folks who spend more expect fewer issues. Sometimes these complaints are because of unrealistic expectations. In my opinion, a correctly built 1911 starts at something between $2500-3000...like a Springfield Professional. Ones costing less means that corners have been cut. Ones costing more usually indicates that the manufacturer is trading on name recognition or there are added custom touches.Seems odd complaints on higher end pistols are more prevalent than run of mill 1911's
also, spending big money doesn’t make you a better shooter. Slowing down, going back to the fundamentals will!!!It's because folks who spend more expect fewer issues. Sometimes these complaints are because of unrealistic expectations. In my opinion, a correctly built 1911 starts at something between $2500-3000...like a Springfield Professional. Ones costing less means that corners have been cut. Ones costing more usually indicates that the manufacturer is trading on name recognition or there are added custom touches.
With the Professional as a baseline, any 1911 that cost more but doesn't offer the same level of workmanship or finish is of lessor value
I believe this is correct. You also see this regarding Dan Wesson's line-up of 1911's.It's because folks who spend more expect fewer issues. Sometimes these complaints are because of unrealistic expectations.
I'm pretty sure the Les Baer break-in period is not to get the gun to work, but rather to make sure the gun is working just as well at 50,000 rounds as it does at round 50.Lots of good opinions and the pii was my first choice but the break in I guess is a turnoff.
This has been my observation also. When you get much above the mid-level 1911s, you really should figure out what you want and be willing to pay the price for those features/workmanship....those that buy a Les Baer 1911, but really wanted a Wilson/Brown/Nighthawk, but just couldn't justify the price of those other makers guns, are usually less pleased.
Dan Wesson's quality has really improved over the years, and are a solid bang for the buck.This has been my observation also. When you get much above the mid-level 1911s, you really should figure out what you want and be willing to pay the price for those features/workmanship.
Folks often get hung up on a "brand name." You really need to look beyond that to look for what functionality you really desire. For most folks, those needs are easily met by the Dan Wesson lineup.
My personal feeling is that if a Dan Wesson doesn't offer what I want, I'd be inclined to save up for a Stan Chen or Ned Christensen...both of whom are really nice people too; even when they knew I wasn't going to make a purchase
Yeah...Les' guns have the reputation of bluing that isn't up to snuff. I have no idea why. He used to use Du-lite bluing salts when I worked there, maybe that had something to do with it. And remember what I posted earlier,: If requested Les will make the gun less tight.My biggest complaint is that a Kydex holster will peel the bluing off like a banana. One can see that in the photo.
Seems odd complaints on higher end pistols are more prevalent than run of mill 1911's which seems magnified as they do not sell as many so to me complaints are more common.