Treo
member
I just think it's cool the way CZ owners ( including moi) come out of the woodwork to sing the praises of these weapons, whenever they're mentioned. I think I've seen like ONE negative comment about them.
I have one negative: hard to see sights on the 75B. The white dots need to be a tad bigger.
4) Decock: A Sig or H&K will perform a full decock, the CZ decocker only goes into half cock.
Actually, I believe both H&K and Sig also decock to the half cock notch. I know that the USP I used to have did so, as did every other H&K I have had my hands on.
I think I've seen like ONE negative comment about them.
how difficult is it to change out sights?
Q - What was the design change that is added with the B suffix?
I read of the CZ75 Compact .40 S&W - said it's 37.8 oz
empty - then the spec. on the full size 75B said 2.2 lbs
isn't that 35.2 oz. The Compac with the shorter barrel and
slide by .8 inch has to be lighter than a like steel frame 75B
eh?
Q? The compact .40 S&W has a 10 rd capacity what's a full size
CZ 75B magazine hold other than California versions of course.
Q? Any issues with the .40 S&W cartridge in the CZ 75B
Q? I haven't heard mention of a magazine disconnect Is there one
or not? I like the better trigger design than the BHP
Obviously, I'm in the market for a .40 S&W CZ75B & since I have a full size
1911 I'm leaning toward the CZ75 Compact .40 S&W It is
DA/SA w/o the decocker?
CZ75B 9mm will be my next pistol.
Should l order one in black poly, blued, or stainless?