EDC/CCW: how many rounds do YOU carry?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Depends on clothing required for the day.

5 with 1-2 speed strips if it's the LCR (much less frequently now)

7+1, 1-2 extra 9 rounds mags if it's the lc9s

13+1, 16 and 13 round mags if it's the SA xd subcompact 9mm

17+1, 1 extra 17 round mags if it's the Glock 17.

Most commonly it's the xd subcompact or the 17 as of late. I've definitely drawn more towards double stack with minimum of 1 extra mag as backup. Sometimes I'll carry the lcp as backup, or rarely as primary. With current events, a double stack with extra mag just makes more sense to me. And really, for me, the concealability difference between the 17, xd subcompact, lc9s and lcr is rather minimal. Ymmv.
 
Maximum carry includes three total magazines, two 17 round mags and one 15 round mag in gun. Also, I never load my magazines to full capacity because that can be bad on the springs over a long time, so, technically, I have a total of 47 rounds in this CC form:

IMG_0058.jpg
 
Loading quality magazines to their intended capacity isn't bad for the springs.

Some people may download the spare/reload by one round for ease of inserting on a closed action + somewhere to put the chambered round whenever they have to unload the gun
 
...
Anyway, another common topic that is always discussed at my local action pistol shoots is everyday carry and how much is enough. Some people are totally fine with a 5-6shot .38 snub or a 6-7shot single stack pocket auto, with no reloads, as their daily defense.

... Before I got injured and went back to school for my current career I was involved in law enforcement. Being so I got into the practice of routinely carrying a primary and auxiliary/back up pistol. Now that I'm a civilian though I tend to not carry an auxiliary firearm majority of the time.

... I've gone this far in my life without getting in a massive shootout, and I'm also very proficient with my carry choices even under duress with my heart rate up and adrenaline pumping. Also, 90% of the time I have another firearm in my vehicle and 100% of the time I have reloads for whatever I am carrying in my vehicle as well. Still though, there is a part of me that thinks as soon as I down grade my round count for comfort, I will regret it in some way. What are everyone else's thoughts on this matter? What types of round count do most of you guys/gals in the civilian realm work with on a everyday basis? All input is appreciated as this is a real dilemma for me haha.

A perennial, but still relevant, question DeadEye9. ;)

Not one which ever really provides a definitive "answer" that will always satisfy everyone who lawfully carries a handgun as a dedicated defensive weapon, either. That's to be expected, though.

Being retired LE, and having served as a LE firearms instructor for 26 years, I've also formed some opinions and personal practices in this regard.

As a young cop I started out carrying either whatever .357 Magnum service revolver I was issued at the time (66 & later a then-new 686), as well as one of my own .357's, a .45 Commander or Star PD or a .44 Magnum (.44 Magnum was an authorized/optional duty caliber back then, too). You couldn't have paid me to own/carry a 9mm anything, although I slowly got into carrying smaller calibers on my own time. That was back in the time when the expression of "full-size, fighting handgun" was still being bruited about in magazine articles and books.

Then, after my agency proved that they could pay me to carry a 9mm - because they took my issued .357 and gave me a new hi-cap 9mm to carry :eek: - I had the opportunity to continue learning.

Toward the end of my career I rediscovered that not only were smaller 9's, .40's and .45's more appealing to me on my own time, being smaller, lighter and generally easier to carry for hours on end ... but I also found myself carrying one or another of a growing selection of 5-shot snub .38's or .357's, and spending a lot of range time using them for the same training, drills/practice and quals as I did with my issued pistols. Yep, reloading was more frequent than with the higher cap pistols ... and more frequent, as well as slower and more involved, with the snub revolvers.

Now that I'm retired from my full-time career and my several years service as a reserve (so I could continue being a training & armorer resource for my former agency, and keep several of my armorer certs current), I find myself giving more thought to my daily carry practices.

I'm no longer carrying to anticipate taking an "enforcement action" to intervene in some in-progress violent crime. It's more about self protection and protection of family (albeit there's still the potential for considering action protecting an innocent third person in the event of some imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death, especially in today's climate of seemingly increased terrorist-inspired or motivated violence, which is apparently why LEOSA was signed into law, after all, but that's another subject for another thread).

That said, I typically use the experience and risk assessment planning I gained throughout my career to think about my daily activities and areas of travel (local or extended). If I'm going to my cigar club, or somewhere that's usually similarly a low risk environment, I'll typically carry one of my 5-shot snubs (and speedloaders/strips) or LCP's. Easy, lightweight and unobtrusive, but still on the lower end of what's commonly described as the "minimum/adequate" range of defensive handgun and caliber (meaning not up in the service/duty caliber range, at least not anymore).

If the activity and area I'm planning to be offers what seems to be a reasonably elevated risk potential? I'll belt on one of my 6-10 shot small 9's, .40's, or .45's. I don't often use my selection of bigger guns, meaning full-size and largish compacts, for retirement weapons all that much nowadays (except, of course, for their continued range training, practice, quals, etc). I might sometimes add a LCP, or even a NAA .22MAG mini revolver, in a pocket holster, as a secondary weapon to the belt gun. Maybe.

When all is said and done, it's still arguably more about the shooter's ability, knowledge, experience and mindset ... and less about the simple size of the gun or the caliber.

Some people can't shoot smaller guns as well as larger ones (noticeably so when you look at their targets, and especially in more so in any demanding training, if they even get any training), so there's their answer.

Some people can shoot the smaller ones quite well, though, so they may decide it's a balanced compromise to choose to use one for some situations, and it might be argued that it beats being unarmed.

TANSTAAFL - There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.

You make your decision using the reasoning and experience that seems most reasonable and prudent to you, under the circumstances and conditions you consider to be the most likely, and you realize that events may still overwhelm you, and that no matter how big the gun/caliber may be, or how many rounds may be in the magazines ... it's still just a handgun, after all. It's not a shotgun or rifle.
 
Last edited:
Depends on clothing required for the day.

5 with 1-2 speed strips if it's the LCR (much less frequently now)

7+1, 1-2 extra 9 rounds mags if it's the lc9s

13+1, 16 and 13 round mags if it's the SA xd subcompact 9mm

17+1, 1 extra 17 round mags if it's the Glock 17.

Most commonly it's the xd subcompact or the 17 as of late. I've definitely drawn more towards double stack with minimum of 1 extra mag as backup. Sometimes I'll carry the lcp as backup, or rarely as primary. With current events, a double stack with extra mag just makes more sense to me. And really, for me, the concealability difference between the 17, xd subcompact, lc9s and lcr is rather minimal. Ymmv.
Aggree with this entirely. I used to be a big caliber fan/carrier and felt that even if I had only had 6 or 8 rounds if they were .357 or .45 it was ok because the rounds had "stopping power". Now that I've been around a while and have seen the difference between service calibers to be so minimal, I gravitate towards what holds the most rounds that I can shoot most effectively and quickly. Usually that equates to a Glock 19 being my EDC. I carry my Shield sometimes as primary but mostly it serves backup duty as I too would much rather have double stack fire power in today's world. I'm about an average size frame for a guy, 6ft/185-190lbs and I have no problem at all concealing a G19/17 comfortably. To me it's all about having the right holster more than the size of the gun itself. I see some people wearing something like a Shield or LC9 in a huge holster and praise it's ease of carry, but to that I say a double stack in a similar holster would carry just as well. It's all personal preference I suppose, but for me if I'm gonna carry I want more than 6-8 rounds based on what I've seen in other real world shootings. I know they say "most" are over within a couple rounds but I've seen more than a few attackers take round after round without stopping their hostile action so I would rather air on the side of caution myself. I also EDC other items as well such as a small Surefire light and atleast one blade in addition to my firearm.
 
I feel just as comfortable with my 5-shot J-frame as I do carrying my SIG P938 with 8 rounds. I do carry a speed strip of .38's in the truck, but I've only put it in my pocket a handful of times. I'm of the opinion that if I need more than 5 rounds, I doubt a handgun is going to help me much anyway.

I do feel naked when I forget my pocket knife, but that's more for it's usefulness than protection. I switched from a single blade Benchmade lock-back to a SAK Trekker last year, and I find I use the tools of the SAK more than I thought I would.
 
I feel just as comfortable with my 5-shot J-frame as I do carrying my SIG P938 with 8 rounds. I do carry a speed strip of .38's in the truck, but I've only put it in my pocket a handful of times. I'm of the opinion that if I need more than 5 rounds, I doubt a handgun is going to help me much anyway.

I do feel naked when I forget my pocket knife, but that's more for it's usefulness than protection. I switched from a single blade Benchmade lock-back to a SAK Trekker last year, and I find I use the tools of the SAK more than I thought I would.

I'm not sure how one reaches an opinion like that. When you consider the average hit rate of about 20% and how many rounds it may take a handgun to stop an attacker, along with the frequency of multiple attackers, 5 rounds is very possibly worth 1 or <1 bad guy out of 2+ bad guys present...but if you had 16 rounds...
 
Loading quality magazines to their intended capacity isn't bad for the springs.

Some people may download the spare/reload by one round for ease of inserting on a closed action + somewhere to put the chambered round whenever they have to unload the gun

OK, thanks for the info. I've heard conflicting reports on this. I'm probably hyper sensitive on making sure my EDC will always fire that I'm willing to go ahead and take one round out of the magazine just to avoid a problem on down the line.
 
Also, I don't skimp on my EDC ammo. It's great ammo, it's very effective ammo, and it's pretty expensive ammo. From what little I know about ammo, the stuff made today is exceptionally good stuff compared to say, 20 years ago. So, real good 9mm hollow point ammo can have excellent penetration and expansion. So, it's really the best of both worlds to have a double stack 9mm pistol AND excellent ammo. Yes, there's nothing like a bigger, heavier bullet for stopping power. That said, if you go ahead and invest in some good ammo, IMHO, 9mm and .40S&W can be very effective in stopping a threat.
 
Depends on what I'm carrying.

S&W 642: 15 total (1 cylinder full and 2 speed loaders)
S&W K Frame .357: 18 total (same deal as above)
S&W 686+: 21 total
1911 45 ACP: 22 total (7+1, 2 spare 7 rounders)
S&W SD9VE: 31 total (15+1, spare 15)
S&W M&P9 Shield: 23 or 24 total (7 or 8 +1 and 2 spare 8s)
CZ-75 9mm: 35 total (17+1, spare 17)
 
"I'm not sure how one reaches an opinion like that. When you consider the average hit rate of about 20% and how many rounds it may take a handgun to stop an attacker, along with the frequency of multiple attackers, 5 rounds is very possibly worth 1 or <1 bad guy out of 2+ bad guys present...but if you had 16 rounds..."


Carrying a 16 round gun vs a 5 rounder is apples and oranges. I consider the 5 shot j frame to be a pocket gun, for times when I can't carry IWB and there is NO way I can fit my SD9VE in my pocket. Better to have 5 than none at all.

Also, all those figures are just averages, including the hit rate of 20%. It includes folks that have never once fired their weapon prior and can't hit anything and others that are able to maintain focus land solid hits at a much higher rate than 20%. Same with that stat that the high cap only folks like to bash - the one about most civilian encounters ending in 0 to 3 shots or whatever it is. For me, a 20% hit rate is simply unacceptable in an urban environment (out in the middle of nowhere, you might get by with throwing up a hail of lead), and I do what I can (including mental prep) to ensure that I will do better than 20%, God forbid I ever find myself in such a situation.

And being outnumbered 3 or more to 1 is a pretty lousy situation to say the least. Ask yourself the question: if you are armed with a wonder 9 (like my SD9VE), 15 or 16+1 and you get attacked by 3 thugs armed with 5 shot J frames, do you like the odds any better than if they were armed with wonder 9s as well? Not to digress too much, but the best bet in that scenario may be to very rapidly ascertain who the pack leader is and stop him - easier said than done - and hope to God his followers don't press on.
 
Last edited:
If you look at averages and statistics there is little reason have more than 3 rounds or to carry at all. When carrying concealed I am preparing for a worst case scenario. For me no extra ammo and a five shot revolver or mouse gun is not adequate preparation.
I have several carry guns. My most carried is a Steyr S9-A1 (10+1) and at least one extra 17 round mag.
 
I personally have never been in a situation to point a weapon at another human being and hope my carrying of one is a total waste of time ,energy and expense. That said I have never heard anyone who has been in a gun battle military or otherwise complain about having too many loaded magazines with them afterward. I dont always carry ammo to reload magazines but carry as many of my friends as circumstances allow and as many loaded magazines as circumstances allow for each one. Each person must do what the circumstances dictate and it is not possible to be prepared for any scenario that possibly could present itself at any place or time. Practice as best as you can but do not hesitate to improvise at moments notice and allow the chance of survival to slip away. Insurance, Im not going to worry about as there are no debtors prisons, a civil judgement is no problem as long as I am still alive just a minor issue. A full third of the humans on this planet live in mud huts, I live like a king in comparison. By the way those guys that Ive heard talking about combat were survivors. Interesting read folks.
 
I'm so thrilled with all the responses to my IMT ammo post, so I decided to start another. These responses and discussions are the entire reason I decided to get into this forum so thank you all in advance.

Anyway, another common topic that is always discussed at my local action pistol shoots is everyday carry and how much is enough. Some people are totally fine with a 5-6 shot .38 snub or a 6-7 shot single stack pocket auto, with no reloads, as their daily defense. Some will bark that (this) practice is going to get you killed; and you must carry a double stack, plus extra Mags, plus a backup with extra rounds for your backup.

OK, Once upon a time, and 'back in the day' I used to prefer to carry any one of several handguns. A Colt 'Mark IV', a Smith & Wesson Model 19, or an S&W Model 686. Both Smiths were snub-nosed revolvers. Myself and the people I used to practice with were very good with these revolvers; and, for any one-on-one engagement I felt that I was well armed enough; but, times change; and, one day, I realized that, nowadays, 'the mutts' have started to run in pairs — if not in packs!

Before I got injured and went back to school for my current career I was involved in law enforcement. Here I got into the practice of routinely carrying a primary and auxiliary/back up pistol. Now that I'm a civilian, though, I tend to not carry an auxiliary firearm majority of the time. Depending on the season, my EDC carry is either a Glock 19, or a 32.

I, too, used to regularly carry either a secondary or a backup pistol just about everywhere I went. Had a few altercations, too; but, after a while, I slowly began to realize that, the way society is (right now) today, I didn't really need the second pistol. What I needed, instead, is a 'high capacity', 100% reliable, primary handgun.

Typically I will carry a standard compact Glock mag in the weapon and carry one extra "duty size" mag in a pocket or mag holder. When I do decide to carry my auxiliary weapon, these days it is my M&P Shield 9mm, non external safety model and rides IWB appendix style, with my Glock riding on my side or slightly toward my back.

My usual EDC carry pieces are a Glock Model 21 which I carry most of the time, and a Glock Model 19(RTF2) which I carry some of the time. With the Model 21's I use Arredondo + 4 magazine extensions (and extended Wolff springs) on my backup magazines. Most of the time, now, I only carry one spare Arredondo magazine; and I use a standard G21 magazine inside the gun. I'm an older gunman; and I download my pistol magazines by one round. I, also, never load a pistol to full magazine capacity + 1 in the chamber.

To me, and as a result of several real world experiences I've had, that kind of pistol loading is just plain stupid. It's not how many shots you've got to fire at some bad guy; it's, instead, about how many shots actually hit where you want them to! Personally, I'd much rather have 100% reliability in a self-defense weapon rather than two or three extra shots prior to reloading. Consequently my G21 carries 12 loaded rounds — Which is a heck of a lot of ammunition for a guy who spent more than a quarter century carrying a 1911 pattern pistol! My spare Arredondo 45 ACP magazine carries 16 rounds.

I use identically downloaded, Glock, factory-standard magazines in my G19; and I have factory + 2 baseplates on the spare magazines that I carry on the other side of my belt; except in 9 x 19mm I always carry two, rather than only one, spare magazine. I do this in order to compensate for the fact that I HAVE LEARNED it takes two or three 9mm bullets to do what only one 45 ACP bullet can do. (Please, no stupid IGF 9mm vs. 45 ACP arguments — OK. No matter what is said on the internet, I've been shooting pistols for more than half a century; and I KNOW, full well, exactly what numerous different pistol calibers can do.)

I don't ever feel particularly outgunned when not wearing a back up; and lately I've even been considering moving to carrying something like my Shield (7+1 or 8-10rd extended) or my KelTec P11(10+1 or 15rd extended) as my sole EDC.

Again, this is my own opinion: In today's present society I don't think you're going to need that second gun; just, and as I've already said, a highly reliable first gun with a magazine capacity of, at least, a dozen rounds. I do, however, think that you're making a potentially serious mistake: The one way you never want to feel in an armed confrontation — the one thing you never want to do — is to be holding onto 'not enough gun' when the pregnant moment suddenly arrives.

Trust me on this: The very last thought you ever want to think at the moment when you see the other guy's weapon is, 'Oh, my God, I didn't bring enough gun!' The very last thought — OK! Everybody likes to take shortcuts; and everybody makes assumptions; but, when it comes to adequate self-defense, I think it's a serious mistake to presume: (1) That you're only going to have to face a single opponent, (2) That the fight is going to occur at 'bad breath' distance, or (3) that you're, somehow, safe because you've got that cute, warm, and cuddly little pistol alongside you for the ride!

All handguns bullets are 'killers' — even 22 LR — but, below 45 Long Colt caliber no handgun is an absolute 100% 'stopper'; and from 44 Special, on up, we're no longer talking viable combat handguns. Some people think that 40 S&W, and 10mm are combat calibers; but I do not. The rate of ACCURATE fire is too slow; and skillful recoil management requires a lot of both arm strength, and practice in order to competently master.

(Besides, round count doesn't matter if the bullets aren't going where you want them to — Right!)

I've gone this far in my life without getting in a massive shootout, and I'm also very proficient with my carry choices even under duress with my heart rate up and adrenaline pumping. Also, 90% of the time I have another firearm in my vehicle and 100% of the time I have reloads for whatever I am carrying in my vehicle as well.

I'm unable to say the same thing about not being in a 'massive shootout'. I'm also very good with a pistol; but so what! The cruel fact is that, depending upon: time, circumstances, and the event you may, or may not be ready to defend yourself.

(I'm going to level with you: There have been days when I would have to agree I was better prepared for some sort of completely unexpected life-threatening event than I was at other times. (Such is life!) The cold reality is that once you're no longer on an internet gun forum — where anyone can be a cyberspace hero — neither you, nor I truly know what's going to happen, or how either one of us is going to react to a dire life-threatening emergency! You just don't know.)

Still though, there is a part of me that thinks as soon as I downgrade my round count for comfort, I will regret it in some way. What are everyone else's thoughts on this matter? What types of round count do most of you guys/gals in the civilian realm work with on a everyday basis? All input is appreciated as this is a real dilemma for me, haha.

The American public is currently caught up in the throes of an epidemic of reduced caliber and lower capacity 'pacifier pistol mania'. Many people are walking around feeling safe when, in fact, very few of these small pistol carriers actually are. For example, typical reasoning is, 'There's only going to be one of them.' 'We're going to be within 1 or 2 yards of each other.' 'I'm only going to have to fire 1 or 2 shots; and it'll all be over.' 'I like my comfortable and easy-to-conceal little pistol; and I'm sure it's going to be good enough for me to handle whatever comes up.'

All of these statements are one form or another of what I call 'feel good rationale'. None of these statements have been universally true in my life; and I'd be very surprised if they turned out to be true in someone else's. My final suggestion would be for you to focus less on round count, and pay more attention to focusing — over a viable focal plane — on your front sight! As a general rule: If it's comfortable to carry then it's, also, the wrong gun for you to be betting your life on, OK!

Finally, to directly answer your question: With a 45 ACP pistol I usually carry 28 rounds in two magazines. With 9 x 19mm I usually carry a total of 46 rounds in three magazines; and to quote Suzanna Gratia Hupp, 'I took my gun out of my purse and left it in my car ....... .' (So, forget about that gun in your vehicle; more than likely it's not going to count; and, besides, leaving a gun in an auto presents a legal liability that I'm sure I wouldn't want to shoulder.) ;)
 
Then again, everything is a trade off. If cost were no object and we planned for worst case, we'd all be carrying belt fed M60s - after we dismount from our M48 Patton tank :D.

I am for sure a better shot with my 4" S&W Model 28 than ANY other handgun I own. For some reason, I can't miss, even if I try ;). But with my back the way it has been lately, I haven't carried it in at least 6 months. Some days I can only manage my S&W 642 - which is fine, I know how to run the thing and it is very shootable in my hands at least, so, beats not having anything at all. And on a day like today, I did yard fairly heavy yard work much of the day - no way I was going to carry my preferred 5" 1911, 3" 686+ or even my SD9VE - so I had my M&P9 Shield with me. I remember rebuilding an engine with my buddy a few years back, I was stooping and crawling around and such with my 5" Government model on my hip - not any more, getting older sucks :( .
 
I'm not sure how one reaches an opinion like that. When you consider the average hit rate of about 20% and how many rounds it may take a handgun to stop an attacker, along with the frequency of multiple attackers, 5 rounds is very possibly worth 1 or <1 bad guy out of 2+ bad guys present...but if you had 16 rounds...

Find me a news report where a non LEO victim used up all 5 shots in a revolver and then was killed because he didn't have a reload. Or where a pistol user needed his/her 2nd magazine. I read the "Armed Citizen" every month in my American Rifleman magazine, just about every encounter says the victim shot between 1-3 rounds and then either the perp was killed or ran away. Same with multiple attackers, when they see their buddy shot they typically get the heck out of there!

I feel more than comfortable with 5 shots. Like I said before, if I needed more than that I probably should have been carrying a rifle.
 
Find me a news report where a non LEO victim used up all 5 shots in a revolver and then was killed because he didn't have a reload. Or where a pistol user needed his/her 2nd magazine. I read the "Armed Citizen" every month in my American Rifleman magazine, just about every encounter says the victim shot between 1-3 rounds and then either the perp was killed or ran away. Same with multiple attackers, when they see their buddy shot they typically get the heck out of there!

I feel more than comfortable with 5 shots. Like I said before, if I needed more than that I probably should have been carrying a rifle.
There was a story a few years back and about a woman and her kids hiding in the attic from an intruder. If I remember correctly she was on the phone with her husband when the intruder found her. She hit him with all five rounds in her revolver then bluffed the guy into leaving saying she would shoot again.
Not bashing revolver guys, I carry one myself occasionally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top