Educate On Ak47 Mak90

Status
Not open for further replies.

one-shot-one

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2003
Messages
1,029
Location
texas
can ya'll educate me on the differences between
ak47's (romanian/bulgarian)(milled/stamped)(single/double stack)
and mak 90's
what is best, whats acceptable and what to avoid.
 
I owned a MAK-90 for several years before some knuckle-dragging pig f*$kers stole it from me.

The MAK-90 is the Post AWB version of the Norinco AK clone.

The only difference between the MAK-90 and the earlier Norinco AK clones were that the MAK-90 had no bayonet lug and that butt-ugly thumbhole stock.

The action, the barrel, etc, were pretty much stock AK stuff.

Some MAK-90s were made from stamped sheet metal recievers. Some were milled out of steel billets. Oftentimes, the perception is that the milled receiver AK clones are better quality, but I've not seen a whole lot of difference between the two as far as performance. There might be some durability differences, but I owned and like a stamped sheet metal version.

Milled Bulgarian AKs--like the SLR 95, are known as some of the best AK clones out there, and you will pay for that--compare costs.

Romanian are usually seen as lesser quality--stamped metal, not as high quality fit and finish, etc, but are also known for that familiar AK ruggedness and reliability.

I say avoid the single stack AKs as they accept only the 10 round single stack magazines.

There are just too many normal capacity AK mags out there for reasonable prices to justify a slightly cheaper rifle with diminished mag capacity.

Shop around. On GunsAmerica.com there is a guy selling Hungarian AKs for not much.

Epytian MAADIs abound for good prices, too, if you shop around a little.

hillbilly
 
:)
thanks hillbilly,

any easy way to spot the difference between the milled and stamped besides price?
i've seen the difference in $ between the romanian and bulgarian
300+ vers. 500+.
 
any easy way to spot the difference between the milled and stamped besides price?

I'm presuming you're talking from photos, 'cause it seems pretty obvious in person. :)

Anyhow, look at the area right above the magazine. If you see a long squarish relief in the reciever from about mid-magazine forward, you're looking at a milled reciever. If you see a little oval dimple pretty much over the center of the magazine, you're looking at a stamped reciever.


-K
 
My advice.....don't get a "milled" receiver MAK-90. I had a "milled" receiver MAK-90 and you're very limited on after market stock choices. My advice.....get a stamped/squared receiver MAK-90 and you'll have many after market stock choices. I currently have a stamped/squared receivered MAK-90 and it's SWEET. Don't worry about the ugly thumbhole stock they come with 'cause you buy a MAK-90 for the steel anyway. Want more info? Try www.ak-47.net . Best, John
 
MAK90 uses a double-hook trigger, like milled AKs, and uses a spring-loaded firing pin. My MAK90's trigger felt a lot smoother than my Romanian AK's single hook trigger. I also had a few burst from the Romanian, probably caused by the floating firing pin.

One problem with the MAK is finding US furniture. I bought a nice set of black plastic furniture from Kvar, but I had to modify every piece, with the exception of the pistol grip, in order to install it and I still had the odd gap at the lower rear of the receiver.
 
Yep.. milled vs stamped is pretty easy.

Milled is heavy and solid. Stamped looks like sheet metal.

Good Shooting
Red
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top