Commander Crusty
Member
Revolver Hammer Spur 3 Myths and 4 Reasons to Keep Yours
I have carried revolvers, with and without hammer spurs, for more than 25 years. I see lots of good reasons to have hammer spurs and few reasons not too.
Three Hammer Spur Myths
"The hammer spur will get stuck on clothing." This has NEVER happened to me in 25 years. I did have the lining of one jacket get torn up, but that was from the thumb strap, not the hammer. Oh, and yes I do sometimes carry a revolver in a pocket holster.
"Single action is unsafe." If single action guns or shooting is inherently unsafe, then we better pull all those 1911s out of people's holsters before they start going off by themselves! Or maybe NOT, since virtually every rifle and shotgun, and more than half of all automatic pistols made in the last 200 years are all designed to shoot single action for every shot.
"You will cock the gun accidentally during a gun fight." Well, I guess you might, if that's how you always shoot your revolver, but then, if that's how you shoot in practice, maybe that's how you SHOULD shoot in a life and death situation where every bullet you fire has a lawyer attached. On the other hand, if you do most of your shooting double action, THAT is what you will default to under stress. Don't believe me? Shoot some matches and see for yourself.
Four Reason FOR a Hammer Spur
1) The hammer spur allows you to safely do a rotation check of your ammunition. I've never had high primers on factory ammo, but I HAVE had it with borrowed hand loads. I rotation check my revolver before I put it in the holster.
2) The hammer makes it much easier to reload the revolver with one hand. You might be surprised how often a hand gets shot, cut or damaged in a fight. Anything that makes it easier for me to hang onto the darned pistol when the chips are down gets my vote.
3) You retain the option to cock the hammer. Most people are going to shoot BETTER double action even at long distances (try it yourself and see). On the other hand, combat is never what you want, it's always what it is. Maybe I'm behind cover and have a long shot and want single action. Maybe, I'm hurt and shooting weak handed and know from my range experience that I shoot weak-hand-only better single action. Maybe my attacker looks like he's about to grab my gun, and I want to discourage that by cocking the hammer (that way the gun will still fire, even if my attack has his hands around the cylinder). Maybe I just like keeping my options open.
4) You dry fire your guns a lot and just feel more connected to a revolver with a hammer spur. To me, the gun feels better with a hammer spur. I "know" how it works. I'm connected with the pieces that move. I control what it does. I had a beautiful custom GP100 with the hammer removed. While I carried it for 5 years, I finally traded it away because it just wasn't much fun to play with--the connection was missing!
Reasons Against Hammer Spurs
If you ever use your revolver in self-defense, a sleezy lawyer will almost certainly claim you negligently cocked your pistol and fired it accidently. If this bothers you, get a hammerless gun. Nothing wrong with them! Lots of people use carry them, keep them at home, carry them around and shoot them in competition. On the other hand, if you want a court defense (beyond not shooting people without a darned good reason), ask the police firearms expert if his shotguns and rifles fire single action. Remind him that the number one selling police autopistol is the Glock and ask him if he can fire a Glock single action (you can, just don't release the trigger all the way forward). Follow-up by asking if virtually every police agency and military power in the world issues guns that are inherently unsafe. The answer is no. Hammer spurs do not make double action revolvers unsafe.
All my revolvers have hammer spurs. I prefer them that way.
I have carried revolvers, with and without hammer spurs, for more than 25 years. I see lots of good reasons to have hammer spurs and few reasons not too.
Three Hammer Spur Myths
"The hammer spur will get stuck on clothing." This has NEVER happened to me in 25 years. I did have the lining of one jacket get torn up, but that was from the thumb strap, not the hammer. Oh, and yes I do sometimes carry a revolver in a pocket holster.
"Single action is unsafe." If single action guns or shooting is inherently unsafe, then we better pull all those 1911s out of people's holsters before they start going off by themselves! Or maybe NOT, since virtually every rifle and shotgun, and more than half of all automatic pistols made in the last 200 years are all designed to shoot single action for every shot.
"You will cock the gun accidentally during a gun fight." Well, I guess you might, if that's how you always shoot your revolver, but then, if that's how you shoot in practice, maybe that's how you SHOULD shoot in a life and death situation where every bullet you fire has a lawyer attached. On the other hand, if you do most of your shooting double action, THAT is what you will default to under stress. Don't believe me? Shoot some matches and see for yourself.
Four Reason FOR a Hammer Spur
1) The hammer spur allows you to safely do a rotation check of your ammunition. I've never had high primers on factory ammo, but I HAVE had it with borrowed hand loads. I rotation check my revolver before I put it in the holster.
2) The hammer makes it much easier to reload the revolver with one hand. You might be surprised how often a hand gets shot, cut or damaged in a fight. Anything that makes it easier for me to hang onto the darned pistol when the chips are down gets my vote.
3) You retain the option to cock the hammer. Most people are going to shoot BETTER double action even at long distances (try it yourself and see). On the other hand, combat is never what you want, it's always what it is. Maybe I'm behind cover and have a long shot and want single action. Maybe, I'm hurt and shooting weak handed and know from my range experience that I shoot weak-hand-only better single action. Maybe my attacker looks like he's about to grab my gun, and I want to discourage that by cocking the hammer (that way the gun will still fire, even if my attack has his hands around the cylinder). Maybe I just like keeping my options open.
4) You dry fire your guns a lot and just feel more connected to a revolver with a hammer spur. To me, the gun feels better with a hammer spur. I "know" how it works. I'm connected with the pieces that move. I control what it does. I had a beautiful custom GP100 with the hammer removed. While I carried it for 5 years, I finally traded it away because it just wasn't much fun to play with--the connection was missing!
Reasons Against Hammer Spurs
If you ever use your revolver in self-defense, a sleezy lawyer will almost certainly claim you negligently cocked your pistol and fired it accidently. If this bothers you, get a hammerless gun. Nothing wrong with them! Lots of people use carry them, keep them at home, carry them around and shoot them in competition. On the other hand, if you want a court defense (beyond not shooting people without a darned good reason), ask the police firearms expert if his shotguns and rifles fire single action. Remind him that the number one selling police autopistol is the Glock and ask him if he can fire a Glock single action (you can, just don't release the trigger all the way forward). Follow-up by asking if virtually every police agency and military power in the world issues guns that are inherently unsafe. The answer is no. Hammer spurs do not make double action revolvers unsafe.
All my revolvers have hammer spurs. I prefer them that way.
Last edited: