Flying with firearms and the TSA, new info

Status
Not open for further replies.
God, this is SO freakin' tedious. Why is it that everything apparently has to be restated ten or twelve different ways, and there have to be dozens of illustrative stories?

So, basically you have to declaire the weapons at check in and have to be prepared to accomodate a visual or physcal inspection. Guns unloaded in a locked hard case for which only you have the key or combo, and only in checked luggage. Ammo can be carried in an appropriate container in the checked luggage but is limitted to 11 lbs including the case. Good idea to carry the regs with you.

Does that about cover it?

What was it Crosby, Stills and Nash used to say? Confusion has its cost, or something like that?

For God's sake, keep it simple!
 
just have to throw in

I have opportunity to fly out of Austin,TX to Indiana where my CHL is recognized, and was considering mailing a pistol to myself c/o the recepient out in IN.
But after reading this thread, well i still can't decide?
What would you all recommend?
C-

p.s. here's a thread you might enjoy:
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=115943

C-
 
Jeff OTMG,

I tried your links and most came up Page not found (error 404). :banghead:

My intent was to print out the regs in case I must fly. :barf:
 
Flew out of Sacramento the other day and the ticket agent (America West) requested that I leave the luggage with handguns in it unlocked. I didn't feel totally comfortable with this, but complied. She said to wait by the counter while the luggage was checked in the back and she would give me the okay to continue past security to my gate. Shortly there after she gave me the go ahead and said they had relocked my luggage. However, when I arrived at my destination my case was not locked and very close to opening up (all contents accounted for though). TSA at my destination saw this and were very unhappy about the situation. I think next time I will put up more of a protest. Losing four handguns would have been a nightmare.
 
But wait, there's more.

According to a small article appearing in Saturday's Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, page A-3, which picked it up from the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, the TSA has been instructed by this newly passed Intelligence Reform Act, to "review" it's compilation of "prohibited items".

Seems that as of February, this new listing will contain cigarette lighters and book matches. Interestingly, lighters, Zippo's for instance, would likely show up on metal detectors, but paper match books, I strongly doubt, which would lead to excactly what, one wonders. Thank you so very much Mr. Richard Reid, the failed Shoebomber, who should have received "flying lessons" for his trouble.

Of course, this Intelligence Reform Act, so-called, seems to be a repository for all manner of "little noticed" bits, "federalization" of drivers licenses as of 2006 to mention one thing,as seems to have become more and more the way things are done by our CONGRESS CRITTERS. I might be terribly old fashioned, anacronistic and otherwise terribly out of date, but this sort of things seems a hellish way to do what used to be known as The Peoples Business.

Giving the devil their do, they did get one thing right. It seems that this legislation told the states to quit showing social security numbers on drivers licenses, which I understand that some did. I've always wondered as to why The Congress allowed this action in the first place, as well as how deeply entwined the SS Number will remain in and or with things having absolutely NOTHING to do with Social Security?

Anyhow, I suppose that the thing could well be described in the following terms. THE PLOT THICKENS.
 
Ah the joys of living in a small city. Here in Charleston WV I flew with guns twice last year. On both occasions I walked up to the ticket counter (no line to speak of ) and signed the orange unloaded firearm affidavit, locked it in my long gun case and off they went. The fellow at the Delta counter is quite nonchalant about folks with guns.

I did find a form from TSA advising that they'd checked the contents of the other bag I'd checked enroute to Salt Lake City but they probably noted the ammo in the bag during some scan. The case with the 870, AR-15 and SIG P229 went locked without a quibble.

Arriving in RSA with guns was amusing but still not a great deal of problems just waiting in line with 40 other fellows for the South African Police to issue us licenses to possess really big guns. :D
 
The latest GOOD links from TSA

C1PNR, at your request I have tracked down the newest links for the TSA info as well as the sections in 49CFR for your printing pleasure.

TSA Firearms and Ammunition regs update FAQ's (the printable version)
http://www.tsa.gov/public/display?content=09000519800ac232&print=yes
http://www.tsa.gov/public/display?content=090005198004ad07&print=yes

The link where TSA admits that the information is in 49CFR remains the same:
http://www.tsa.gov/public/display?theme=79

The pertinent sections of 49CFR follow with link for printing after the description:
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 49, Volume 8]
[Revised as of October 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 49CFR1540.111]
[Page 295]
TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER XII--TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
PART 1540--CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY: GENERAL RULES--Table of Contents

Subpart B--Responsibilities of Passengers and Other Individuals and Persons

Sec. 1540.111 Carriage of weapons, explosives, and incendiaries by individuals.
is found here:
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/tex...v8&view=text&node=49:8.1.3.7.8.2.10.6&idno=49

[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 49, Volume 8]
[Revised as of October 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 49CFR1544.203]
[Page 320-321]
TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER XII--TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
PART 1544--AIRCRAFT OPERATOR SECURITY: AIR CARRIERS AND COMMERCIAL OPERATORS
--Table of Contents

Subpart C--Operations

Sec. 1544.203 Acceptance and screening of checked baggage.
is found here:
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/tex...8&view=text&node=49:8.1.3.7.10.3.10.2&idno=49
 
Jeff,

Thank you very much for providing these links and information. I certainly do appreciate your efforts. :)

I hope I never need to use this information, as I think today I prefer to drive if taking firearms. However, one never knows what may happen next week and this information may well make the difference between a smooth trip and a hassle. :D
 
Re the bureaucrats at TSA, as well as the idiots at various airlines, and those in The Congress (House and Senate), and my own congress critters, to whom I have asked the following question at one time or another, for want of something better to do at the moment, I will ask it once more.

Regarding the 4 airliners that were hijacked on 11 September, 2001 how far was this hijacking likely to have progressed had,

1. The pilots been armed, as for many years they were REQUIRED to be.
2. There had been any of those vaunted Sky Marshals onboard.
3. Any of the passengers had been armed.

While the following conclusion is speculative, it still seems likely that the answer would have been NOT FAR. By the way, events in Gold Finger notwithstanding, even a couple of .45 caliber holes in the hull of a commercial airliner would be unlikely to cause catestrophic decompression depicted in the film.

This is evidenced by the fact that an airliner on a flight to or from Hawaii lost a significant portion of the cabin roof, yet the plane remained in the air, and landed under control of the pilot.
 
LEO in sterile areas.

If you are LEO and plan on escorting someone to the gate. Please make sure to tell a TSA supervisor that you are armed and sign in otherwise, if you make it through the threshold on the metal detector you could be in a world of hurt. TSA fines range from $3000-7000 for such violations.
 
I must admit I found this thread very interesting, but not at all surprising. Why would anyone expect TSA officials to know what their own rules are regarding the transport of firearms? The level of ignorance and blind implementation of policy shows that the TSA does not want its officials to use any degree of intelligent judgement. The case in LA where a GI Joe doll's 6 inch plastic M16 was confiscated is a great illustration of this problem. The responsibility for this goes to President Bush, who for reasons that escape me, retained Norman Minetta as Transportation Secretary from the Clinton administration. Mr. Minetta is so vehemently anti-gun, and anti-common sense in his attempt to follow political correctness, that I believe he has put us all at great danger. If you have followed the situation regarding the training of pilots to allow them to have a firearm in the cockpit you should have no doubt that Mr. Minetta, and by accepting this, President Bush, does not really want pilots to have these firearms on the aircraft dspite the will of the US Congress, and certainly does not want the rabble of the common man to easily and safely transport "evil" handguns. My only surprise is that we haven't heard of cases of ignorant TSA official confiscating shipped firearms and treating the owner as a terrorist.
 
vito:

Regarding what you wait to hear about, and the antics of the TSA hirelings, Patience my man, Patience.

You might be hearing about such antics sooner than you believed was possible.

By the way, respecting the antics of the U.S. Congress (House and Senate), concerning the REARMING of airline pilots, they used to fly armed you know, my late and much lamented MAIDEN AUNT was possessed of more balls, all by hereslf, than seems to be the case with the entirety of the male component of the above mentioned bodies.
 
Let me add some TSA experiences to the pot and also pose a question.

Last year I made 16 trips by air. I had a different experience each time. In Burbank the ticket agent said leave the locks unlocked. He added he knew this was incorrect but he added this is what the TSA at his corridor wanted and it would make both out lives easier.(It seems there are separate teams for each concourse and one team's requirements don't necessarily match the other.)

In Las Vegas, the TSA agent was angry that I left the locks unlocked, demanding they be locked and that I wait by the baggage belt until my bag went through. One , the one with the gun , did go through while the other i found had been put aside at the inspection area. I then asked him about the latter and was told, "don't worry". He then turned his back on me.

The best? one I had(it's tied with another) was when a TSA employee inspected a SIG I had in a MOGUL gun glove. Here the butt and the slide protrude. He picked up the package(by the way TSA folks are not to handle firearms) and stared into the gun muzzle for a long minute or so. He then stared into the mag well the same length of time and then went back to staring in the muzzle. I asked if he'd like the gun out and he shook his head "no".

I had a TSA supervisor tell me I could not have ammo in the same locked box with my gun. As I had but one suitcase I picked up the offending box and dropped it into the larger portion of the suitcase. She said "good" and then added "you wouldn't want someone to get ammo when they stole your gun would you?'" I could not think of a rational answer to this that would not result in me spending more time with the authorities.

I had TSA confiscate my zippo lighter fluid in my checked baggage-yup! prohibited.(they took me over to a wall mounted TSA sign that so stated-the sign faced the TSA folks; not passengers.)

I was told I can have two BIC lighters in there as well a matches and can carry a BIC in carry on as well s the Zippo. As it was slow, I had a pleasant discussion with the one TSA persona s to how long a Zippo would go without needing a refill with him being helpful by relating his own "zippo" experiences. I, of course, and noting his apparent expertise then queried him as to how various conditions of heat and dryness would affect his conclusions. He was more than happy to oblige me with answers.

Question? Anyone else experience this?

A friend of mine, going though a small airport had the local police "assist" TSA. He overheard, via a nearby LE radio, one of them running the serial numbers of his guns.(1028?) This one is new to me. Anyone else know of the airport LE running gun numbers?
 
Lion In Winter:

Re your last comment, "A friend of mine, going though a small airport had the local police "assist" TSA. He overheard, via a nearby LE radio, one of them running the serial numbers of his guns.(1028?) This one is new to me. Anyone else know of the airport LE running gun numbers?"

Has that often spoken of police state arrived, or is it merely that something already here, has become more obvious to some?
 
A couple of years ago the Indianapolis Airport Police interjected themselves into my baggage search and called in serial numbers on all three of my guns while I was speaking to a FAM. FAM, 2 Indy Airport cops, 3 members of TSA, and 2 from Northwest Airlines. It was quite a party. Everyone acted professionally EXCEPT the Indy cops. TSA's ineptitude precipitated the action, but the Indy cops were either liars, idiots, or some combination of the two.

I have run into the 'no ammo in the same bag with the gun' arguement before as well. In Evansville, In about a year and a half ago with a TSA agent. I reported the incident to the regional supervisor with he agents name and mentioned the appropriate legislation. It has been addressed. It happened again last weekend in Austin!!! Very unusual, but it was a Continental Airlines employee this time. While doing the firearms inspection she mentioned hat ammo could not be carried in the same bag. I showed her the federal regs, but told her that the airline might have a reg against it and all I ask is that she show it to me. After some checking she realized that she was wrong. Sometimes airlines have more strict regs than the federal govt. Pepper spray is one of these. Under federal regs you can transport up to a 4 oz container of pepper spray in your checked baggage, but both Northwest and Continental have company regs against it.
 
Jeff OTMG:

I personally do not recall seeing any mention of this particular brand or type of ammunition on this or any other site, however respecting your financial interest therein, however much that might be, it's "gentlemenly" of you to mention it, even in passing.

By the way, just in passing, given that ones handgun(s) is/are secured in CHECKED LUGGAGE, why in blazes should ammnunition in CARRY ON LUGGAGE present any problem at all, given that nothing is present that it could be fired in.

After all, if one were intent on MISCHIEF, a quite ordinary book or magazine can quite easily be turned into a "WEAPON", if one so desired. Of course, given the "sensivity" to threats, real or imagined, of our "security stalwarts" down there at TAS, and the Ivory Towers were lurk airline executives, perhaps I should have not have made mention of the foregoing.

If it turns out that books and magazines are the next things to be banned, all for our own good, of course, I offer in advance, my humblest apologies.
 
Alan, regarding the ammo. I first saw it and began using it in 1999 and put a post on TFL about it. In 2000 and 2001 there were a number of magazine articles about it, you will never see any advertising, and there are posts on forums around the net on it. There are opponents of the ammo because it does not perform in jello and they don't know how it works so it must not be any good. The thing is that is real life there are a bunch of dead people and it works fine. I am doing live fire demos for Tactical teams a trainer for the 75th Rangers sniper group is impressed with the product as are many operators in Iraq and Afghanistan. The 'been there done that people' like it and that is good enough for me. I am not interested in pontificating theorists. All I know is that, with one notable exception last summer, if you get shot you die. I just feel that the disclaimer is in order since this is a free site I don't want it to be viewed as advertising and it would not be honest for me to tell people how great something is without them realizing that I have a financial interest in it. If you are interested in some info I have some links and photos that I can email you that you can view for yourself. PM or email me.

They allow no part of firearms, including mags or ammo, in carryon luggage. At the Oklahoma City airport there is even a sign stating that no gun parts are allowed including choke tubes for shotguns.

Your mention of reading material brought a smile to my face. Yesterday, Friday, I was checking in for a flight and they took me in the back to the gun check station. I had a couple of particularly small guns with me and the agent mentioned that she couldn't believe that they were real guns. I then told her that there was one even smaller and I told her how they can all be taken through the security checkpoint and onto a plane. She was shocked because she realized that I was right. I told her that there were many weapons on a plane and I mentioned the rolled up magazine and metal pens. I told her that I always travel with a CD or DVD. She didn't know that they can be broken in half to make two sharp slashing weapons. I would never have mentioned that to TSA, it was only to agents that I see a few times a month and have been flying with them for years.
 
I don't want to beat this horse deader than it is, but I just wanted to add this $0.02...

I travel pretty frequently with my firearms too.

Here's what I do

1) I always bring a copy of federal regs with me.

2) I always bring a copy of state regs with me - the one I'm starting from and the one I'm headed to.

3) A piece of paper on it, that says in large, clear type:

"I am declaring legal, unloaded firearms and, separately, ammunition in my locked, checked luggage".

#1 is very helpful if TSA wants to do weird things like retain the keys to a handgun case.

#2 is there just in case. I've never had a problem with #2.

#3 is very helpful so you don't have to scream at the top of your lungs in a crowded airport that you're traveling with a gun. I just hand the piece of paper to the attendant and politely ask her to read it carefully. You don't want everyone in line to know that you're packing, right? (Incidentally, I do this at Fedex/UPS too when shipping stuff to FFL's).

So far, I've never had any problems at the airports. Politeness is always returned (I know, hard to do that when you're a cranky traveler), in my experience.

Recall that ammunition has to be checked separately from firearms. What I've found is that many times, after TSA gives you the little orange card to put in your gun case, and you lock it up, there are no problems with the gun itself.

However, TSA sometimes does a second check in the bag where you have AMMO (or maybe even a cleaning kit with organic solvents). I've noticed that they will so so far as to break a lock looking at the ammo. Go figure.

Anyhoo, Browning makes a very nice hard plastic pistol transport case - for the money it can't be beat.
 
30 cal slut, there are some serious problems with the way your airport is operating. Where do you fly?

You mention that:
'many times, after TSA gives you the little orange card to put in your gun case'
Since 9/11 I have flown on over 600 flights and this week coming up I am on 6 flights in 5 days. I have NEVER had TSA give me a 'little orange' card. In the last 20 years of flying with firearms, it has always been the airline counter personnel, even in California. In fact it is not a federal requirement that a written form be filled out. TWA use to just make an electronic note of it, no tag was ever issued. The airline has its' own rules that it follows and most have a tag to sign, but they aren't all orange (Southwest uses a white tag). From the TSA website:
* The firearm must be declared ORALLY or in writing in accordance with the air carrier's procedures (contact your air carrier for their specific procedures).

As you can see from this the TSA even says to check with the air carrier. The declaration is made to the airline, so how have you been getting 'orange cards' from TSA and where? I am going to have some FUN this week. I am already on a first name basis with some of the regional and airport heads of screening for TSA and don't have a problem adding more.

Two other things bother me about your post. The first I originally blew off as my misunderstanding, but then you followed up later with a second statement:

firearms and, separately, ammunition
Recall that ammunition has to be checked separately from firearms

Neal Know wrote in a Shotgun News column this same falsehood. This is ABSOLUTELY incorrect. I have had to fight this information at a couple of airports, most recently in Austin a couple of weeks ago with airline counter personnel, and with TSA in Evansville, In. about a year and a half ago. Ammunition CAN BE CARRIED IN THE SAME HARD CASE AS THE FIREARM.

49CFR1540.111 governing the passenger:
'(d) Ammunition. This section does not prohibit the carriage of
ammunition in checked baggage or in the same container as a firearm.'

and

49CFR1544.203 governing Operations:
'(g) Ammunition. This section does not prohibit the carriage of
ammunition in checked baggage or in the same container as a firearm.'

You are not doing the rest of us any favors by inventing more regs then there are.

There MAY be an airline rule on the airline that you travel on that has that requirement. That is not impossible. According to federal regs a passenger can carry a chemical weapon, like mace, tear gas, or pepper spray, in checked baggage, but restricts it to a 4 oz container. This was to allow LEO's to transport their spray. HOWEVER, both Northwest and Continental Airlines both prohibit chemical sprays from checked baggage regardless of size. So if you are having to pack ammo separate from the firearm you may be running into an airline reg. I can't believe that they would want passengers to check more bags, but it is possible. I have not run into this on Northwest, Continental, Continental Micronesia, Delta, Southwest, American, TWA, nor United, but those are the only carriers that I have flown in the last 5 years. Who do you fly?
 
Jeff OTMG

Sounds to me as if there might be some confision between yourself and 30calslut respecting federal and airline regs.

Your question as to why the airlines would have regulations that would lead to additonal checked bags is certainly a point, but then the airlines also opposed the arming of pilots too, along with those bums at TSA Management.

As for myself, back in the 80's on a flight from Pittsburgh to Charlotte NC, I transported a handgun, declared, in checked luggage, along with what I described as "some ammunition", which was about 1500 rounds, yes the bag was heavy. Airline counter personnel said nothing about the ammunition, only asking if the pistol was loaded. I was later told, in conversation, that the transport of a handgun and ammunition, in the same checked through bag was a violation of regulations, I assumed federal, but possibly it was airline. If it was, then the counter people weren't familiar with their own regs, fortunately for me.

seems as if the problems described by some here revolved around TSA Stupidity, or bureaucratic highhandedness, neither of which should be accepted by paying passengers. Airline travel has become difficult, almost traumatic all by itself. We do not need anything that makes it worse.
 
I might indeed be confusing the carrier and TSA with the orange card thingie. Anyhoo, I don't know if it's airline policy or TSA policy, but everywhere I've gone on the East Coast I've been asked to pack ammo separately from the gun. So as a practical matter, I pack them separately. Less hassle to put up with at the airport.

Interestingly, most of the time TSA has bent/broken the lock (you know, those little cheap combination locks) on my luggage (9/9 of the past trips!) to ostensibly look at the ammo or cleaning solvents (not the gun) was in N. Florida en route to or from nearby hubs like Atlanta.

I wonder if every airport handles things a little differently.
 
> I wonder if every airport handles things a little differently.

You better believe it, that is what I am trying to fight. You have TSA officers at airports all over the country and many of them do not know the very regulations that govern their jobs. I must say that the heads of screening seem to, but that knowledge has not been transferred to the guys on the floor of the terminal. I did not have a problem in Orlando, but the screeners are on the passenger side of the counters and that is usually a good thing. For some reason when the screening equipment goes out of site behind the ticket counter, suddenly there is some super secret society with their own secret handshake running things. I am headed to Phoenix of Friday and leave Sunday, I have not been to Sky Harbor since 1987 and I am interested to see how things might have changed. Have paperwork will travel!
 
Jeff OTMG wrote in part:

I wonder if every airport handles things a little differently.

You better believe it, that is what I am trying to fight. You have TSA officers at airports all over the country and many of them do not know the very regulations that govern their jobs. I must say that the heads of screening seem to, but that knowledge has not been transferred to the guys on the floor of the terminal. I did not have a problem in Orlando, but the screeners are on the passenger side of the counters and that is usually a good thing. For some reason when the screening equipment goes out of site behind the ticket counter, suddenly there is some super secret society with their own secret handshake running things.

***********

Funny thing, but that is exactly the problem in and with so many things. People anointed with that proverbial "nickles worth of authority", go hog wild exercising powers that in fact they might not actually have, while at the same time, they haven't a clue about what their authority actually is, what they are supposed to do, or how to do it.

Welcome to that NWO!!!!
 
PHX was a DREAM to fly out of. The Southwest agent, Mac, was excited about getting to inspect the guns as he is a gun person. He mentioned the national ID proposal and gave me the link to the Gun Owners of America. He is a big Larry Pratt fan. I mentioned that I was a Life Member of the GOA and he said that I needed to sign up for the email alerts. We discussed the proper procedures and TSA, he said that in Phoenix they new the correct procedures, and they did. I am happy to fly through PHX, I can only wish that it was like that everywhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top