FN FiveseveN Warning *Picture Heavy*

Status
Not open for further replies.
How many Glock KB's have you heard of and are you running away from them???

Actually yes I've run away form Glocks in .40S&W. I've a 17 and 21, but won't own one is .40S&W. This is made pretty easy since my Glocks are about my least favorite guns to shoot.


The video had the slide being manually pulled out of battery with the trigger already reset. That's not what is happening during the "normal" firing sequence.

Huh? If the gun lights a primer when out of battery and the hammer/striker falls, its a problem! The reason the gun is out of battery when fired is not relevant to the resulting potential safety issue.

--wally.
 

There is no Huh about it. The video demonstrates one scenario which did not exist during the alleged OOB with the reloaded ammunition. You can't use the video to support the OOB argument of the other. They are different situations.

--
Mike
 
Hint: it is a bottle neck cartridge. Started out that way. Now in the pictures where is the bottle neck Hmmm blown out the front of the pistol, maybe/maybe not.

:uhoh:
 
There is no Huh about it. The video demonstrates one scenario which did not exist during the alleged OOB

Explain why what holds it out of battery matters to the dangerous issue of it firing out of battery?

If its out of battery it should not be igniting primers!

The reason its out of battery is a separate issue.

My Witness will fire with the slide about 1/8" back but it is not out of battery since the slide and barrel are still in lock up, a tad more reward motion and the slide starts to unlock from the barrel and the hammer fall will not ignite primers -- I see a light, off center mark, but no firing. This is how it should be.

--wally.
 
Again, the alleged OOB.

Stick your head in the sand and call the guy who posted the you tube video a lier, but I see it firing a primer when clearly out of battery. That's all I need to never be buying one unless the issue is fixed!

Its your hand, but if I see someone shooting these at the range, I'm backing away a good safe distance.

--wally.
 
One of the reasons I go to inside range's they have great barriers between each shooter. Safer:uhoh:

If it was "out of battery" I think the bottleneck cartridge would still be seen, it isn't observed in the picture.
:confused:
 
Stick your head in the sand and call the guy who posted the you tube video a lier, but I see it firing a primer when clearly out of battery. That's all I need to never be buying one unless the issue is fixed!

Careful Wally, I don't want you to stroke out on us here.

What I said was that I did not believe the video represents the scenario f3rr37 described in his original post. And I really don't believe that I called anyone a liar.

I've shot the Five-seveN, the PS90 and the P90, but I own none of them and really don't have a desire to own one. But, if given the opportunity to shoot either or all of them again, I would.

--
Mike
 
Stick your head in the sand and call the guy who posted the you tube video a lier, but I see it firing a primer when clearly out of battery.

I watched three videos of the so called OOB firing and I didn't see anywhere the 5.7 was "clearly" out of battery in any of them. Where in the videos did the operator show the 5.7 OOB? I am not calling this video poster a liar just inaccurate and wrong. These videos show some amount of slide movement then a primer is popped. So what? I am not impressed with the measurement method either just someone holding the gun by hand and measuring the slide movement after the pop. Not very accurate as I see it. The gun in the video could be defective or misassembled who knows. I tried this same "experiment" with my 5.7 pistol and after .085" of slide movement the firing pin block saftey prevented the firing pin from movement even if the hammer did fall. In the 5.7 the slide and barrel are locked together by Lever 1 for the first .154" of rearward movement not until passed this rearward movement does OOB began.
I would depend on the information that the FN factory rep published and my own personal observation/measurement rather than some crude video that never showed the gun OOB. No my head is not in the sand.
The 5.7 is not OOB just because the slide moved rearward. The slide/barrel are locked together for the first .154" of rearward movement. :)
 
The guy claimed he measured over 1/4" out of battery. I've no way to know if his measurement is accurate or not, but its not rocket science.

You folks with a FiveseveN could settle the issue with some simple tests using a resized and primed empty cases like I did with my .45ACP Witness out of curiosity -- with the conclusion it will not ignite a primer unless the slide and barrel is lock-up which implies a rearward slide/barrel max movement of about 1/8" for this pistol. With the slightest downward barrel movement to unlock from the slide (out of battery) the primers were lightly off-center marked but did not ignite.

A single gun that's some how defective and fires out of battery is one problem, if the you tube guy is right and they all do it its IMHO a very serious design flaw. IF none do it, the you tube guy is mistaken or deceptive then the bet has to be on overcharged reload.

I've no dog in this hunt, other than I take the you tube guy's claim at face value and took the FiveseveN off my shopping list, if for no other reason than I don't like non-reloader friendly guns.

--wally.
 
Wally
I just told you I did a test and the 5.7 pistol is not OOB before the firing pin is blocked. The FN rep told us the same thing. To believe the 5.7 pistol has a defective OOB system design is nuts. FN spent millions designing/testing the 5.7 pistol and your theory is they missed the OOB thing. Why is it so difficult to think that they got it right?
You cling to this video that never shows the 5.7 pistol OOB. The 5.7 is not your Witness. It operates totally different. For one thing the barrel does not tilt downward. The barrel and slide are locked by the Lever 1 for at least .154" of rear slide/barrel movement before they seperate, unlike your Witness. The 5.7 operating system is unique it is not at all like a recoil operated system.
It is as well designed and safe as any other modern firearm.:)
 
Wally this was posted on another forum from the guy that made the video.

The video was made in error as this would not be the normal function of the gun.

There are a few points I'd like to clarify.

1. The video's that I made with the pistol firing 'out of battery' do not demonstrate a fully out of battery discharge; they only demonstrate at which point the weapon will still fire when the slide and barrel are pushed to the rear while the internal safety mechanisms still operate. Nobody yet knows at what point the weapon will fire when truly out-of-battery; either when the weapon is functioning properly or when a malfunction is introduced.

It is an important distinction that needs to be clarified.

Since the weapon does NOT 'lock', there are some concerns that a hot cartridge could 'rocket' from the chamber when spring pressure is reduced due to the slide and barrel not being in their fully-forward position.

2. FN will be conducting testing to determine what failure was present in Jake's pistol; to that end we will be working with FN's engineers to provide them with data, and possibly ammunition, to further this goal.

Thanks for opening the thread for me to post this information, Justin.

-Ryan

The dimension in the video was close to .140
 
Since the weapon does NOT 'lock', there are some concerns that a hot cartridge could 'rocket' from the chamber when spring pressure is reduced due to the slide and barrel not being in their fully-forward position.
In normal operation at the moment of ignition the slide/barrel are "locked" by the action of Lever 1 this is at the beginning of the cycle. As the cycle progresses and the slide/barrel continues rearward slide/barrel slowly unlock while still under pressure this is how the shoulder stretches so much. If the Lever 1 is still intact slide/barrel were locked at the moment of ignition and it is in battery even if the slide is not all the way forward. If the round rockets from the chamber seperating the slide barrel during pressure peak it has to break Lever 1 to do it.
Read the patent. :)
The 5.7 is as safe as any other modern firearm.
 
Last edited:
I’ve watched this thread, on numerous forums, and it is gratifying to see that more and more individuals are now not only reading the patent(s) for the 5.7, but also understanding them.

It is my sincere hope, that with this growing knowledge, this entire episode can be put to rest.

Chris

PS....I also agree....The 5.7 is as safe as any other modern firearm.
 
I’ve watched this thread, on numerous forums, and it is gratifying to see that more and more individuals are now not only reading the patent(s) for the 5.7, but also understanding them.

It is my sincere hope, that with this growing knowledge, this entire episode can be put to rest.
Yes the info is great but some individuals have wrecked the 5.7 pistols rep, forever I fear. People who think they are 5.7 supporters are putting out, at the least, misleading videos, dangerous reloading misinformation, this will follow the 5.7 pistol from now on. Apparently they have no real knowledge of the operating system. Sad really sad for an advanced hi tech pistol to be set back like this. I feel bad for FN as they have had to suffer the hits quietly while they work hard to produce great firearms to defend this great nation. The bottom will be seen on this one.
I have a dealer that I thought was on the ball about firearms. I asked one day why he didn't stock the 5.7. His answer blew me away. "The slide is made of plastic and it is a toy gun that might blow up in your hand." This from an otherwise sane individual I've known for 20 years. I brought mine in and demoed it to the staff and showed it is steel where it needs it and plastic where it needs. Threads like this all over the net spreading misinformation are a big set back big time. FN has its work cut out countering all this crazy stuff. :)
 
Another update for today:

I picked up my package today, which ended up not being a package at all, but a UPS Express Envelope. Included were two letters from FN, one from Rick DeMilt (Senior VP of Sales and Marketing) and the other from Tommy Thacker (Product Manager).

The first letter reads:

Rick DeMilt said:
Mr. [Fuzzy],

In an effort of best customer service relations, FNH USA, LLC. will replace your pistol at no charge and the replacement will be sent directly to you. This is a unique situation and not a precedent for the future.

Please be aware that the owner's manual for the Five-SeveN handgun clearly states on page 4 that FN Herstal declines any responsibility and invalidates any guarantee and liability claims for incidental or consequential damages (injuries, loss of property, commercial loss, lost of earnings and profits, ...) resulting in whole ore partly from the use of reloaded ammunition.

If you have lost or misplaced your owner's manual please contact our customer service department at 703-228-1292.

Regards,



Rick DeMilt
Senior VP of Sales and Marketing
FNH USA, LLC

The second letter, note the bold red header is actually on the letter.

Tommy Thacker said:
Warning

DANGER CAUSED BY RELOADED AMMUNITION!

Subject: Five-seveN serial # 386102425

Date: 6-9-2008

The following conclusions are results from FNH USA's evaluation of the Five-seveN serial # 386102425 sent in to our service facility after a failure using reloaded ammunition.

Upon examination of this pistol we were able to determine that it did not fire "out of battery" and the catastrophic failure exhibited in this example was clearly caused by excessive cartridge pressure generated by reloaded ammunition.

Our examination showed that the shoulder of the case was separated from the rest of the cartridge and it was left in place inside the chamber. The position of this piece of brass shows that the handgun was in full battery when the reloaded cartridge was fire and the excessive pressure occurred. Another indicator that confirmed our findings is the primer extruded back into the firing pin hole and a portion of the case head was stuck to the breech face. This was caused by brass flow back into the leaded chamber indicator hole.

Additionally there was serious damage to the slide assembly which is clear evidence of excessive pressure. The lower edge of the breech face was peeled away and the slide itself was deformed from the excessive pressure. The pressure that caused this damage exceeded OEM ammunition standards.

The FN ballistics laboratory was able to duplicate the catastrophic failure almost identically with 2x the load data provided by the consumer. In this test the shoulder of the cartridge was left in the chamber at the same position as #386102425, the slide was damaged in the exact same way as #386102425, and the cartridge case head seperated in the same manner with the brass flowing into the loaded chamber indicator hole.

The design of the Five-seveN pistol, being a recoil operated delayed blow back system, has key parameters that prevent an "out of battery" firing.

Our established testing data indicates the firing pin will not strike the primer of a cartridge after .1180 inch. of rearward slide travel. With the slide moved rearward .1540 - .1545 inch. (true out of battery limit), it is impossible for the firing pin to strike the primer, at this point the trigger lever does not actuate the lever of the firing pin safety. It was also noted in our examination that the firing pin safety was still fully functional on Five-seveN #386102425.

It is FNH USA's finding that the catastrophic failure of Five-seveN #38610xxxx was due completely to excessive pressure caused by the reloaded ammunition and was not the result of an "out of battery" firing.



Please be aware that the owner's manual for the Five-SeveN handgun clearly states on page 4 that FN Herstal declines any responsibility and invalidates any guarantee and liability claims for incidental or consequential damages (injuries, loss of property, commercial loss, lost of earnings and profits, ...) resulting in whole ore partly from the use of reloaded ammunition.

If you have lost or misplaced your owners manual please contact our customer service department at 703-288-3500 x122 for a replacement.




Tommy Thacker
Product Manager
FNH USA, LLC.

So from FNH's findings, the cause was excessive pressure caused by a double charge (~10grains of TrueBlue powder). Like everything both mechanical and human, there was an error. In all honestly I'm still not quite convinced that I double charged the load, but from their findings of excessive pressure that they were able to duplicate in almost the exact same manner, it is probably the result of a double charge.

I accept the findings of FNH's investigation and testing of the incident that happened to me on April 12, 2008. I accept full responsibility for the accident and hope that others can learn from my mistakes.

I also want to make clear that in my original post, my statements were based off of my observations and firearm at hand. [I kept the Five-seveN in the original condition it was in when the failure happened to preserve anything that might help in FNH's investigation and the only thing I did was handle it, I never tampered with(or cleaned) any part of the gun.] My original post was based on the lack of customer support I had received from FNH after my accident. I never asked FNH to replace my firearm for free, I merely asked if they would like to take the gun in for inspection.


I want to thank everyone here on the forum for their support and encouragement, also specifically Medula Oblongata, for the time he spent to help me figure this out, and Tommy Thacker who stepped up to the plate as FNH's Product Manager to take care of a situation that rocketed out of control.

Thanks everyone,
-f3rr37

*Also, I received the new Five-seveN USG on wednesday. If you have questions/concerns please post them here: http://fivesevenforum.net/showthread.php?t=17426
 
very glad to see you look like your mending well.

i think the thing i am most impressed with in this whole story is your open minded outlook on what caused this.

it would be easy to imagine a fella saying "there is no way it was double charged, it was something,,,anything else."

i admire you for that, not that it matters, but i do, so there it is.

this is the best thread ive ever read here to date, it is also the only thread in any forum that has captured my attention so completely as to make me read every post of an 8 page thread.

i think it has been beneficial for me to the point that it will actually make me be more careful as a handloader (im also not convinced that yours was double charged, but am convinced that it could happen to me)


i am glad to hear that they are replacing the pistol. to not do so would literally be adding insult to injury.

mostly im glad to see that your healing up nicely.

very good thread dude.
bryan.
 
The posted pictures do not show if the primer was actually struck by the firing pin. It is possible that the primer was high or overly sensitive and was set off by the breech face of the slide. The presence of a firing pin indent, and whether it was centered and other details would be instructive. Also a stuck firing pin that is protruding can also "slam fire" a round out of "battery"

Your FN pistol I believe functions as a blowback firearm without any mechanical lockup. An out of battery round certainly could result in a case separation. If you can find the primer it might help. I do not own that model of FN pistol, but FN has a good reputation for making excellent weapons and one would think that this design would be well thought out.

I pray for your speedy recovery
 
In an effort of best customer service relations, FNH USA, LLC. will replace your pistol at no charge and the replacement will be sent directly to you.
That's some straight shootin right thar...

I accept full responsibility for the accident and hope that others can learn from my mistakes.
So is that!
 
Wow, seems to me FNH USA went above and beyond. Kudos to them!

I can't imagine how much damage threads like this and videos such as the one on youtube do to a company's reputation and bottom line.
 
I can't imagine how much damage threads like this and videos such as the one on youtube do to a company's reputation and bottom line.

If you are one which has watched this thread, in all it's various forms, and as the issue became not the gun but the reloaded ammo, you'd realize that the company reputation is just fine and has actually has been enhanced by the outcome. Even then, FN has stood behind their product after the suspected reload was ID'd as the culprit.

I was pretty sure as this thread played out that the FN line was solid. Now I'm even more sure. Kudo's to FN.

--
Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top