H4895

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slamfire

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
13,190
Location
Alabama
I had been recommending to folks, for use in the M1a, H4895. This was based on information that H4895 was shorter cut than IMR 4895. Based on a recent visual examination of H4895, I was unable to notice any dimensional differences between the powders. The only differences I saw were that IMR 4895 is a tube, H4895 is a cylinder, and H4895 is green.

If there are differences in the powders, it has to be in the chemistry of the powders.

The comparison was made with Military Surplus IMR 4895 to new H 4895.

ReducedIMR-H4895oncard.jpg

ReducedIMRnexttoH4895.jpg


I tested some H4895 loads in my recently rebarreled M1a, and in my Ruger M77.

As match bullets have gotten hideously expensive, I decided to shoot some of my pulled 174 FMJBT bullets. These bullets vary considerably by weight, and I sorted them into two categories: bullets which weighed more than 174 grains, and bullets less than 174 grains!. By comparison, a Sierra Matchking seldom varies by 0.2 of a grain.

I was just looking for velocity comparisons and potential group diameters.

I also shot some of my old “White Box” M118 308 Match ammo. This stuff was loaded with the old 174 FMJ. Even though I was looking at the box yesterday, I cannot remember if the printed velocity was 2550 fps or higher. Anyway, out of my M1a, LC79 M118 chronographed at exactly 2550 fps.

For me, this provides a basis for comparison. I know the LC match was pressure tested both for breech pressure and port pressure and is completely compatible with the M14 action. So I figure if my loads with H4895 are close to M118, I am not stressing my rifle.

Due to small sample size, I had a funny: in the M1a, the velocity average of 41.0 grains of H4895 was exactly the same as 41.5 grains. However with the 26” Ruger barrel, the data does show a difference.

If I start trying this powder with 168’s, based on velocities, I think 41.0 grains would be close to a maximum target load for 100 F days in August at Camp Perry. Velocities were slightly higher with this load than M118, so it likely to be a little higher pressure. For target shooting out to 300 yards, you don’t have to push the 168’s all that fast. Perhaps at 600 yards, and with more experience with this powder, I would bump up the charge.

Until I shoot up a bunch of this stuff, I cannot say it is any better than IMR 4895 or AA2495. I have shot kegs of those powders and found they provided consistent target grade performance in the .223/308/30-06. And since there is no short cut advantage to H4895, future buys are going to be based on whatever powders are cheaper.

Still, it looks like it has potential.


M1a, new 22” Douglas 1:10 six groove barrel.

174 FMJBT 40.5 grs H4895 wtd, lot 4501 LC mixed WLR
OAL 2.800"
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2524
Std Dev = 36
ES = 90
High = 2587
Low = 2497
N = 5
good group


174 FMJBT 41.0 grs H4895 wtd, lot 4501 LC mixed WLR
OAL 2.800"
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2594
Std Dev = 14
ES = 30
High = 2609
Low = 2579
N = 5


174 FMJBT 41.5 grs H4895 wtd, lot 4501 LC mixed WLR
OAL 2.800"
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2593
Std Dev = 15
ES = 42
High = 2613
Low = 2571
N = 5
Best group

174 FMJBT LC79 Match M118 White Box
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2550
Std Dev = 16
ES = 41
High = 2564
Low = 2523
N = 5



Ruger M77 MKII Factory 26 " Barrel 1:10 twist


174 FMJBT 40.5 grs H4895 wtd, lot 4501 LC mixed WLR
OAL 2.800"
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2559
Std Dev = 14
ES = 50
High = 2589
Low = 2539
N = 11
good group

174 FMJBT 41.0 grs H4895 wtd, lot 4501 LC mixed WLR
OAL 2.800"
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2634
Std Dev = 19
ES = 50
High = 2657
Low = 2607
N = 6
good group



174 FMJBT 41.5 grs H4895 wtd, lot 4501 LC mixed WLR
OAL 2.800"
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2670
Std Dev = 3
ES = 9
High = 2675
Low = 2666
N = 5
good group

174 FMJBT LC79 Match M118 White Box
18 May 2008 T = 71 °F

Ave Vel = 2590
Std Dev = 11
ES = 35
High = 2609
Low = 2574
N = 9
Excellent group
 
SlamFire1,

Good info! It is good to see someone else call the USGI FMJBT's 174 grain (instead of 172 or 173 grain as is common in print), as the median weight is MUCH closer to 174 grains. And, yes, these bullets will vary in weight by a full 2 grains.

Even though I was looking at the box yesterday, I cannot remember if the printed velocity was 2550 fps or higher.

Yep, 2550fps.

Here is what I get with my FN SPR, 26” 1:12 four groove chrome-lined barrel.

174 FMJBT bullet
41.0 grs surplus IMR4895
LC '72 M118 Match Brass
Fed 210M primer
OAL 2.810"

Ave Vel = 2704
Std Dev = 12.44
ES = 31.46
High = 2722
Low = 2690
N = 5

What with the price of bullets now, I'm glad I picked up these bullets cheap when I did.

Don
 
Thanks Don, and I too am glad I purchased some ammo cans of 174's from Pat's Reloading on Commerical Row at Camp Perry, and a couple of kegs of Surplus IMR 4895.

I am shooting up the surplus as fast as I can, and my surplus shoots just outstandingly.

But as I told a gentleman at the range, shoot the stuff up as quickly as you can. I have had 50% of my surplus 4895 powders detoriate to the point where it had to be tossed out on the lawn. I would first notice excessive neck cracking on fired brass, and when I pulled bullets, found corrosion on the bottom of the bullets.

I believe IMR 4895 or the equivalents to be the best all round powder in medium capacity cartridges. I truly think a person could reload 95% of everything with 4895 or 4350.
 
Slamfire, the main reason I chose 4895 was the fact I could load .223,.308.30-30,30.06,7mm-08,.243 with it and I only have 1 can of powder on the bench. In fact only use 2 pistol powders, bullseye and 800x. No I'm not cheap, just frugal. I know there may be "better" powders for a particular caliber, but with my shooting ability, I can't tell. Mac
 
Try Varget sometime. All the utility of 4895 but no temperature issues


I tried Varget. I bought a keg from Fin and Fur on Commercial row. Got a good price. I developed loads with it. In 308, it shot just fantastic with a bolt rifle. However, in my M1a, I developed case head separations with 43.0 grains. And the velocities were not that high.

I know folks who claim they are using Varget in M1a’s, however in my M1a, I had problems. That tells me that Varget must vary significantly lot to lot, and that my lot is too slow in a M1a. Other load development has shown me that my lot of Varget is significantly slower than IMR 4064.

Gas guns are designed to open up at the tail end of the pressure curve. This lengths the amount of time there is useable energy. Cases will be stretched excessively if the breech pressure is too high.

So, to me, Varget is marginal. Yes it will work well in a bolt gun, but I want to be able to shoot loads in my PRT91, FAL, and in my M1a. So I want something faster burning.

Like IMR 4895, AA2495.

M1a 22” Douglas 1:10 six groove

168 Hornady Match 42.0 grs Varget wtd Lot 4295 Mixed LC WLR
3-Oct-05 T = 87 ° F
Ave Vel = 2541
Std Dev = 17
ES = 51
Low = 2514
High = 2565
N = 12


168 Sierra Match 43.0 grs Varget wtd Lot 4295 Mixed LC WLR
3-Oct-05 T = 87 ° F
Ave Vel = 2604
Std Dev = 15
ES = 49
Low = 2581
High = 2630
N = 20

case head separations; too slow for M1a
 
You may not be aware of this, but Bruce Hodgdon got into the powder business part time while he was working for the Gas Service Company in Mission, KS. He acutally worked for my Dad. He started up by buying boxcar loads of surplus military powder and repackaging it. I think one of the first offerings was BLC followed by BLC2 later. He went to my Dad one day and said he had a tough decision to make; whether to stay in the powder business part time or leave the Gas Company and go into the powder business full time. My Dad asked him "How much money are you making in the powder business?". BE's reply was, "Let me put it to you this way, I make enough money with the Gas Co. to pay my taxes on the powder business.". My Dad just laughed and said "I think you've answered your own question.". BE never looked back.

Oh well. Just an interesting bit of trivia.
 
I like h4350 because it burns slower than 4895. My 243 has a 24"brrl and I like the gradual pressure build-up right up to the pill exiting the brrl
 
...I want to be able to shoot loads in my PRT91, FAL, and in my M1a. So I want something faster burning.

Like IMR 4895...

+1. I've got a FN SPR and FAL in .308, as well as a Garand and many other .30-06's. Surplus IMR4895 (at $10 per pound) does it all.

Don
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top