1) Animals are just that, animals. They are not humans. Doesn't matter how similar we are to them or how many parts from them we can use in our bodies.
2) Quick, clean kills are the best way to go. But not in a "
every circumstance, no exceptions" kind of way. And I will again say, if you really think that way, then you should start outlawing all types of hunting that wouldn't painlessly kill the animal and start hunting with tranquilizers.
3) These hogs are a pest. They are hurting the farmers livelihood. But since some of you don't care about that, I suggest that if you want to have the hogs killed in a "nicer" way, come up with the $1400 per hog that is living on the destruction of farmland and give it to the farmers and their families.
4) To those who think you can just have a ton of hunters roaming the farmland in an attempt to take out as many hogs as the guys in the helicopter did is unrealistic. You have to cover a large area over many farms. It would take a lot lot longer and would be more likely to get some of the hunters shot considering the number of hunters needed.
Riddle me this: Why is it wrong for humans to cause the suffering of animals, yet it is completely acceptable for other animals to hurt other animals?
Answer: it isn't wrong. This is our world and God gave it to us. We are to be good stewards of it, but it is for our use and benefit. That means, when possible, be humane. When there is a pest, do what is necessary.
When the black plague was ravaging Europe, being carried by rats and such, do you think anyone would have had any problem if the fastest way of killing the rats was also the most painful if it meant that it would end the plague quickly and keep humans alive?
*EDIT*
But saying this is ok is akin to anti-government activists saying what Tim McVeigh did was ok, because the end justifies the means.
I take offense at this. Killing hogs is no where near the same as the terrorism McVeigh did to
PEOPLE.
Really, such a comparison is just sick and certainly is not High Road material.