qajaq59
Member
Shucks... nobody told me we were racing!!!!!
Interesting, I see some posts are gone, particularly one that I posted on Friday. I have to ask a question at this point about censorship. Are we being censored?
I consider the job THR moderators do quite good at keeping the threads pertinent to OP, civil and in line with THR principles and rules.Interesting, I see some posts are gone, particularly one that I posted on Friday. I have to ask a question at this point about censorship. Are we being censored?
There are exceptions of course. Doesn't setting your powder charge fall into the "reloading time"? Some powder droppers are easier to set than others -- like the Lee Pro Auto -- but unless you are always throwing the same powder and the same charge there is time involved in getting the charge set correctly. What about primers, doesn't it take time to setup the correct primers in the tube or tray? Maybe as I load a wide variety of calibers it does indeed take me more time, but if you just want to count the time once the handle gets pulled, then my numbers appear to be in line with everyone else. For me though, it's not my actual time if I don't add the time prior to the handle pull.I totally disagree. If you spend that much time on prep, than you have a lower round per hour production. I take spent cartridges straight from my range bag and into a tumbler. I do not count that time in my loading, as it is not time spent loading. I dump them in and let them run for a hour or two. When they come out they go into a bin, then from the bin to the press, no more prep needed. The only exception would be rifle rounds that get trimmed, and that is usually just after the first firing.
There are exceptions of course. Doesn't setting your powder charge fall into the "reloading time"? Some powder droppers are easier to set than others -- like the Lee Pro Auto -- but unless you are always throwing the same powder and the same charge there is time involved in getting the charge set correctly. What about primers, doesn't it take time to setup the correct primers in the tube or tray? Maybe as I load a wide variety of calibers it does indeed take me more time, but if you just want to count the time once the handle gets pulled, then my numbers appear to be in line with everyone else. For me though, it's not my actual time if I don't add the time prior to the handle pull.
I also only load about 100 rounds of each caliber at a time because with that, my ammo box is full to capacity.
IDK, when I come back from the range, I have a pouch of all sorts of brass. 50, 44, 357m, 357sig, 10mm, 45acp all mixed together. I tumble them all together so I need to make sure the 50 gets in the tumbler 1st, then 45, the 44 next, then the 10mm, then 357sig, and finally 357mag or they all end up inside of each other. Ha, there's got to be a better way though Once done tumbling then I need to sort, it all takes time.I usually would count the time spent to set up the measure and fill the primer feed. My system is usually just a fill the hopper and adjust the knob, so its pretty fast. Same with my primer setup, I load 100 at a time, and it takes less than a minute. I just cant see counting time to tumble, which is the only thing I left off. My brass is tumbled immediately after sorting, and put into bins. Grab it out and reload. What else is left to count?
IDK, when I come back from the range, I have a pouch of all sorts of brass. 50, 44, 357m, 357sig, 10mm, 45acp all mixed together. I tumble them all together so I need to make sure the 50 gets in the tumbler 1st, then 45, the 44 next, then the 10mm, then 357sig, and finally 357mag or they all end up inside of each other. Ha, there's got to be a better way though Once done tumbling then I need to sort, it all takes time.
I grant you that a powder check die would be the bottom line for safety but, how bad a load can I get if I eyeball every charge as I'm putting the bullet on? I can certainly spot a no-charge or a double and am almost guaranteed to spot an out of tolerance charge that would be of a sufficient amount damage my guns. At least that's my logic.After I started shooting 300 rounds every weekend I decided it was time for a progressive. My first was a Dillon 550B, that press did 300 rounds an hour. My second press was much more impressive being a Dillon 1050. With the 1050 I can crank out an honest 1200 rounds an hour before my arm gets tired. I soon sold off the 550B for a 650XL. The 650XL produces about 400 to 500 rounds an hour. This is all quality ammo that I would put up against anyone else's.
I also don't agree with Oneounceload's comment about checking the powder charge. My presses are equipped with powder check dies and will let you know if the charge isn't correct.
I warn anyone thinking of going progressive to be sure and invest in powder check dies. It's not 'IF' you are going to get a bad load but more 'WHEN'. I want to know about it on the press not in the gun.
Now all you folks with the progressive presses don't stone me. There is nothing wrong with progressive presses and making ammo.
I have a RCBS RCII and a Mec 600JRV that I reload on. EVERYTHING is singlestage. I LIKE to take my time and really do enjoy reloading. I find it relaxing.I perform each step on every cartridge because I enjoy it.
I think you'll find it a lot easier if you do it that way. For one thing you can do some, stop, and then pick it up again later on. Without having to leave the powder hanging around on the bench. Also it allows you more time to inspect the cases a little better as well. I used to do it the other way, but now all my rifle brass is prepped ahead of time.I just might start to process the brass in advance of actually loading the ammo.