If I had to I'd go for Federal expanding full metal jacket load.
If you mean classical FMJ than I'd probably go with Winchester USA. If I wanted something hotter I'd get some Buffalo Bore fmj.
I'm curious why you ask? Around my rural property in the sticks I carry my M&P9 loaded with the first three rounds being 9mm nato spec fmj. I do this out for practicality sake in case I need to shoot a varmint I don't have to waste premium jhps.
If you want round nose FMJ 'ball' ammo, PMC, Remington, Winchester, Federal are all about equal.
I haven't bought any Prvi ammo in 45ACP but I have several other calibers (44 mag, 8mm Mauser, etc) and they all perform flawlessly. It's also less expensive than a lot of the USA made brands.
Sticking to non-expanding FMJs for my .45 Auto, I'd go with Federal, Winchester, Fiocchi or Sellier&Bellot 230 gr. FMJs and expect a high probabilty that the round will exit (since 230 gr. ball @ 850 +/- 25 fps will produce about 26" of penetration against soft tissue) whom- or whatever I have to shoot.
My personal experience with Remington/UMC ammo has been less than desirable- seems to be low power stuff with some QC issues and cycles unreliably in some of my pistols.
The Winchester 230 grain FMJ in the white box bulk package works fine as an all-purpose load for practice, or CCW. It's been 100% reliable in both my Glock and 1911A1.
I haven't shot any S&B in .45 calibre, but the 9mm and .32ACP I've used has worked fine. Some S&B ammo seems to be loaded a little hotter than US ammo, but that may just be a subjective opinion, I haven't personally tested by brand for comparison.
I'd crank up my lead round nose bullets to max charges. In fact, I plan to do that if/when I carry my 97b as it doesn't seem to like hollowpoints much.
Kinda curious as to why you are asking this question ... I have never even seen a bad rebiew of S&B ammo. I am sure they are out there, but look hard enough and yiu will faind a bad review of anything.
I guess I am legitimately curious as to why you think S&B is not reliable enough?
Well, all I did was ask a question... I asked if S&B was reliable enough. Since it is a quesiton, you can safely assume that I must not know the answer. So you are drawing erroneous conclusions by saying I don't think S&B is reliable enough.
Hornady used to offer a 230g truncated cone load and bullet. Since they discontinued that the Fiocchi TC load looks like a possible replacement. I may have to get a box or two to chronograph and otherwise test.
SB & Fiocchi are the ammo manufacturing powerhouses of Europe.
Both firms produce ammunition of excellent quality...often loaded to higher velocities than the offerings of the US Big Three (Winchester, Federal, & Remington).
I'd use either brand without reservation (in 230 gr FMJ .45 ACP).
I don't think effectiveness changes much when shooting different brands of FMJ ammo in .45ACP.
That being set aside, I'd go with accuracy, cleanliness and cost. My most consistent experience has been with CCI Blaser. It is what I use for practice and local IDPA matches
I'd go with Fiocchi, S&B, CCI, or really anything else. With an FMJ projectile at handgun velocities you aren't going to see any real performance differences on the target's end as long as they're not ultra-light target loads. So whichever one your specific pistol likes best, go for it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.