OK. Basic idea: to crack CCW wide open in court OR legislature, we need to expose what's going on.
Prior attempts to do so have run into weaknesses in the Public Records Act. Basically, PRAR suits are hideously complex (beyond the scope of somebody lacking an attorney), and there's no penalties for improper withholding of data, PLUS even straight attorney's fees aren't guaranteed. So a solo practitioner lawyer can go broke chasing these, esp. if counties like Santa Clara use the "paperwork overload" trick (aka "oceans of motions"). Don Kilmer flat turned me down on a PRAR suit against Sheriff Laurie Smith in Santa Clara for this reason.
Possible cure #1: the lawsuit against AB1044 is still very much in play. This is financed with $10k of SAF money, with myself, SAF and CCRKBA as plaintiffs against Cal-DOJ. We're trying to block them from destroying records plus gain access to their "central stash" of data. That'll blow stuff up REAL nice.
Failing that, or in supplement to it if it works: a lot of the weaknesses with the PRA will evaporate after November's passage of the constitutional right to records amendment. And it WILL pass, OK? Guaranteed. Folks, in California, it's an automatic triple attorney's fees multiplier for violations of constitutional rights
. At that point, somebody like Don Kilmer could make a *killing* taking on Smith or similar wacky sheriffs.