Hogwash!The belief the something is dangerous, or a threat; if we didn't think that we would never carry
Hogwash!The belief the something is dangerous, or a threat; if we didn't think that we would never carry
Would you refuse to go someplace based on whether or not you could carry a gun?
It can definitely be done. There are plenty of folks in my area who never leave the state, don't own an "on road" vehicle and carry a gun every day, everywhere that they go. Not my thing, but there are those who do it.I don't think one can. There are some places you have to go unarmed or they could disarm you and put you with a bunch of other disarmed people.
As eloquent and articulate as that response was, I'm afraid I didn't quite get what you mean. Could you elaborate?Hogwash!
The first two are very common here. Folks don't need to stay home in order to carry all the time though. I don't carry at home, typically. When I leave home is when the gun goes on.Yeah, I guess if you gave birth at home, home schooled, stayed at home all the time, it would avoid places one can't carry.
The comment was "The belief the something is dangerous, or a threat; if we didn't think that we would never carry".As eloquent and articulate as that response was, I'm afraid I didn't quite get what you mean. Could you elaborate?
I mean, you live in fear of ironing your clothes so....The belief the something is dangerous, or a threat; if we didn't think that we would never carry.
Apparently, since you carry you are living in "fear" when you do.
I'm sorry but if you sift it enough at some level that is a decision driven by fear.But I do carry. The reason is because it is possible that a threat may materialize.
I'm never completely unarmed. I refuse to have my fangs pulled by the deep state NWO Globalists crowd. Being armed doesn't always mean having a firearm on one's person. But, there are states that I have vowed to never visit again. California, Massachusetts, Oregon, Illinois and New York. That's not inconsequential to me given that I have daughters and grandchildren living in Sacramento (well, Roseville) and Portland.Would you refuse to go someplace based on whether or not you could carry a gun?
Would you refuse to see you're favorite artist in concert if you couldn't bring your gun? Would you refuse to visit the Grand Cañon unarmed?
What ever you like to do would you do it if you had to do it unarmed.
How can "fear" exist in the absence of a know, perceived, oor expectd threat?I'm sorry but if you sift it enough at some level that is a decision driven by fear.
I absolutely wear seat belts and have fire extinguishers and have an alarm system because of fear.How can "fear" exist in the absence of a know, perceived, oor expectd threat?
We do not use seatbelts, acquire fire extinguishers, or put in alarm systems because of fear.
I'm not shortchanging my life over guns.
Fear of what?I absolutely wear seat belts and have fire extinguishers and have an alarm system because of fear.
It's not a paralyzing fear. But it is in fact a fear
Fear of going through the windshield in my car in a collision.Fear of what?