Isn't the forward assist on an AR a dumb idea?

Not sure if the forward assist is a bad idea but if the rifle needs it, then the rifle itself is a bad idea.
 
The AR charging handle is fir retracting the bolt only.
There is no mechanical contact between the charging handle and the bolt going forward.
True, but smacking it forward eliminates the poss. that the charging handle was hanging up the bcg from going full into battery, and also makes sure the handle itself is properly forward
 
Another way to get the bolt to fully close on a M16 & HK 91 style rifle is to bang the buttstock of the rifle on the ground.
That doesn't work so hot when you are hugging the ground for cover.
That is how we would slam open a Mini-14 or a AR-15 with a stuck bolt. Never tried closing a bolt like that.

I’ve used FA lots of times. After a press check, when trying to deploy quietly, etc. I know of one cop killer still on death row who is alive today because the deputy who deployed her Mini-14 rifle tried to be quiet about it and the bolt wasn’t fully seated when she fired at him. Click!! (The clown then jumped through a window, shot the resident in the leg and tried to take him hostage, suspect was barricaded until he surrendered.) Had she just pressed the bolt forward to ensure the round was seated the story would be much different, it’s a lesson I learned and never forgot working in the area where this happened.


(The article doesn’t have all the info, the after action reports had the final circumstances and response issues.)

Choose one or not, use it or don’t. It really is no sweat off anyone’s brow but the one with the gun.

Stay safe.
 
Last edited:
Like it nor not, think it is a good idea, or not, the Army has required a means to manually close the bolt on rifles since the M1 Garand. Had they adopted the T48 (FAL), it would have had a forward assist, or an equivalent.
 
Not sure if the forward assist is a bad idea but if the rifle needs it, then the rifle itself is a bad idea.
You beat me by a few posts. I'm a fan of the FA, but not a fan that the design needs it. I prefer side charging handles the way God intended.
 
I don't mind having a forward assist but you better damn well know what you are doing to ever use it because its likely to get you into more trouble than it will save.
 
Honestly I think the biggest negative of the forward assist is that they made it a shape and location that is inviting to hit it with the palm of your hand. If you have to hit it that hard to go into battery then you shouldn't be using it. Thumb pressure only.
 
Honestly I think the biggest negative of the forward assist is that they made it a shape and location that is inviting to hit it with the palm of your hand. If you have to hit it that hard to go into battery then you shouldn't be using it. Thumb pressure only.


I disagree, you're not going to hurt anything by using the Forward Assist every time you chamber a round.
If you need that gun to work this instant, tapping the forward assist with the heel of your hand ensures the bolt is fully seated, and is a little extra insurance.
 
I disagree, you're not going to hurt anything by using the Forward Assist every time you chamber a round.
If you need that gun to work this instant, tapping the forward assist with the heel of your hand ensures the bolt is fully seated, and is a little extra insurance.

You're not going to hurt the rifle, but what I am talking about is if you try to use it to fix a failure to go into battery due to a bad round that doesn't fit in the chamber or there is some object in there preventing it from closing. A good smack on the forward assist is now going to mean you may still not be in battery and will probably rip the case rim off trying to get it out. I've had this exact experience.
 
Last edited:
You're not going to hurt the rifle, but what I am talking about is if you try to use it to fix a failure to go into battery due to a bad round that doesn't fit in the chamber. A good smack on the forward assist is now going to mean you may still not be in battery and will probably rip the case rim off trying to get it out. I've had this exact experience.
It's best to find out you are using crappy ammo on the range. I have 2000rds of Tula 223 that results in broken shell casings, without the use of the Forward Assist, every shot fired (on multiple brands of AR15s).

Part of my kit for my AR15's is a take down cleaning rod and a broken shell case extractor.
 
You're not going to hurt the rifle, but what I am talking about is if you try to use it to fix a failure to go into battery due to a bad round that doesn't fit in the chamber. A good smack on the forward assist is now going to mean you may still not be in battery and will probably rip the case rim off trying to get it out. I've had this exact experience.
Same would happen with a charging handle.
 
Same would happen with a charging handle.

One shouldn't beat on a fixed charging handle either, and most are not a shape that you want to hit with much force. The thin hook shaped charging handle on an AK, M1, mini 14, ect makes it somewhat obvious that this is a tool for moving the bolt and not a target to beat on. If a gentle push with your palm or firm press of the thumb doesn't move the bolt you should be trying to get that round out of the way. I see a lot of guys in videos pounding on it like it owes them money.
 
Last edited:
I don't have an AR. They lack soul and feel like BB guns, and I've never been attracted to them. Battle rifles is where it's at for me.

Still, I recognize their utilitarian use, and I could use a semi-auto that shoots intermediate rounds. The AR is generally more accurate than the AK from all I've read, so I'm looking at full-length ARs with carry handles.

Whichever one I settle on, it will have a forward assist. I can't imagine not having the ability to push a bolt forward if the chamber is a bit dirty, or something similar.
 
I’ve been doing the AR thing for quite some time in recreation, target shooting and hunting.

I can’t recall a situation in which I have thought “if only I didn’t have this pesky forward assist, I could have made that shot or walked an extra mile.”

At the same time I’ve ever had a use for it. However, if I was ever in a challenging situation and felt the need to push forward on the bolt. I’d rather have it than not.
 
I agree in principle, however, in a pinch you can push forward on the bolt using the cam cutout for the dust cover latch.

I don't have an AR. They lack soul and feel like BB guns, and I've never been attracted to them. Battle rifles is where it's at for me.

Still, I recognize their utilitarian use, and I could use a semi-auto that shoots intermediate rounds. The AR is generally more accurate than the AK from all I've read, so I'm looking at full-length ARs with carry handles.

Whichever one I settle on, it will have a forward assist. I can't imagine not having the ability to push a bolt forward if the chamber is a bit dirty, or something similar.
 
I built one slick side AR-15 (no forward assist) and found I could not seat a round by pushing on the dust cover relief in the bolt.

So, I like having the the forward assist. I use it only rarely but it is invaluable when needed.

I did build one side pull AR-15. But it is a 204 Ruger varmint rifle and usually carries a brass catcher when in the field. The brass catcher gets in the way of using the side pull to charge the rifle.

Use a forward assist, don’t use a forward assist, it is good to have choices and options.
 
I agree in principle, however, in a pinch you can push forward on the bolt using the cam cutout for the dust cover latch.
Read the first sentence in post# 50. This idea is only valid if the bolt carrier isn't very hot. OK for a hunter who rarely gets the bolt carrier too hot to touch, but remember: This gun was designed for soldiers who, in combat, are likely to have the bolt carrier too hot to touch.
 
He mentioned using it when his AR wouldn't fire. A tap on the F/A apparently solved the problem.

I am much more interested in your avatar .45 1911 than forward assist arguments pro and con on an AR :).
 
Back
Top