Col. Harrumph
Member
Where can we discuss?
The members need to fix the board it is a disaster, they allowed the mismanagement to happen. It's has way to many people on it too.I went by what Jeff Knox (Neal Knox's som) recommended: https://firearmscoalition.org/author/jeff/
I generally trash the ballot but since WLP has been spanked, decided to vote. I don't go by who the board recommends. So vote only for the four recommended by Jeff.
Thank you.Where can we discuss?
I heard on another forum he's getting a $17 mil golden parachute.Until the WLP issues are completely resolved and the bylaws get rewritten there is zero reason to vote. Save the dieing organization the postage and throw the ballot away.
Surprise, Surprise, Surprise...I heard on another forum he's getting a $17 mil golden parachute.
It's one that concurs with my own. That Bylaw change is a sop, it scans like all the weasel-worded Referenda or Stat Constitution Amendments see on mid-term elections. To where the title is actually 180° opposite the result.That is just my take on it.
The Bylaw change to add a compliance officer is too little too late. A complete overhaul is needed, so I am voting against the proposed bylaw change, but you may disagree.
BINGO! If the current board is for it, be against it.Whichever candidates not recommended BY the board are the candidates you should vote for.
If they are/were on the board when Wayne stole millions, I am not voting on them simply due to their sex. Have known a lot of evil, corrupt women over the years.At least vote for all the women.. Sounds stupid but they need to be represented to attract other women, who are 50% of the population. Sorry for the sexist remark but I am only able to recognize 2 genders at this time. Joe
This is a good example of applied logic.Whichever candidates not recommended BY the board are the candidates you should vote for.