LiveLife
Member
I agree as many state laws have been overturned by the US Supreme Court.
And just as Heller ruling expanding 2A to individual rights for self defense to the surprise of many, I could see SCOTUS doing the same for 50 state carry and application to "modern" arms such as semi-auto firearms and other modern "arms" devices to help lawful citizens' right to self defense, even for those with physical limitations. To me, modern firearms/technology developments are "reasonable accommodations" for law abiding citizens living less physical lifestyles or actually having physical limitations in terms of strength and dexterity.
I mean, no one disagrees with ADA right?
Why isn't AARP and feminists all over the support of 2A ... I guess because violent crime and rape have been outlawed?
And just as Heller ruling expanding 2A to individual rights for self defense to the surprise of many, I could see SCOTUS doing the same for 50 state carry and application to "modern" arms such as semi-auto firearms and other modern "arms" devices to help lawful citizens' right to self defense, even for those with physical limitations. To me, modern firearms/technology developments are "reasonable accommodations" for law abiding citizens living less physical lifestyles or actually having physical limitations in terms of strength and dexterity.
I mean, no one disagrees with ADA right?
Why isn't AARP and feminists all over the support of 2A ... I guess because violent crime and rape have been outlawed?
Last edited: