Low price optics

igotta40

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
893
Location
Houston
Has anyone bought either of these scopes, if so, any opinions? I’m looking for a high magnification for short range (100 yards and less) for .22lr and 22WMR target practice. Will mount on a Marlin 981TS and/or Savage 93.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7499.png
    IMG_7499.png
    281.9 KB · Views: 112
  • IMG_7495.png
    IMG_7495.png
    337.7 KB · Views: 112
When it comes to high magnification scopes for under $100, despair awaits you on this journey.

I have had the Barska in 6-24x, it's garbage. In a 10-40x50, anything over 25x is going to be unacceptably DARK. Resolution sucks. Turrets suck. When buying most low cost scopes, I've known and accepted that which I was getting myself into, but I didn't get my money's worth from the Barska.
 
Unless your expectations are very low you will probably not be happy for the above mentioned reasons.

Also higher magnification magnifies not only your target, but, optical imperfections in the system. Any problems with the glass just gets worse the higher you go. I have seen scopes that will give you a headache because of being blurry, glare , etc, in short order when at higher power.

Another issue is the zero changing when the power is changed. Very common in cheaper scopes. The higher the power, and the wider the range, the more this can change. It doesn’t happen on every one. However it can start happening on a previously working scope.

If going low priced you are better sticking to lower power range in my experience.
 
It's double your budget and you'll have to wait a few months, but I have 3 of these and they are an excellent value when Midway puts them on sale for $200 which happens a few times a year. I have 2 of them on .22's I take out to 200 yards and another on an AR15. It basically has the glass of the higher Viper line and is made in the Philippines, not China.

 
I have owned Barska in 6-24x50 I took it off my gun because it got too cloudy, I couldn't see even 100yds.
I have recently bought one of these scopes & to my surprise it's fairly clear. I use it on my competition shotgun to see the single shot pellets hit the target. It probably won't last very long but if I get a year out of it, it will have paid me back for it.

 
Has anyone bought either of these scopes, if so, any opinions? I’m looking for a high magnification for short range (100 yards and less) for .22lr and 22WMR target practice. Will mount on a Marlin 981TS and/or Savage 93.
Low price optics have really come a long way in the last ten years or so. If you're going to go with something that's more of a budget-friendly option, you're better off looking at the lower end Vortex, Burris, Leupold, or Primary Arms optics.

Barska makes trash, and you'll be unhappy with their scopes.
 
looking for a high magnification for short range (100 yards and less) for .22lr and 22WMR target practice
As others already posted, "You get what you pay for" applies here as "Too good to be true" scopes promising the sky with long list of features will come short on some things whether it's cloudy/lack of clarity of lens, crosshair that won't move precisely or won't hold zero or other issues.

If you want "affordable", hard to beat Bushnell Trophy line for durability with clarity of lens and comes with lifetime warranty. If you are mostly benching the scope and won't be bumping around, even Bushnell Banner line could be considerable over other no-name brand scopes as Banner line also comes with lifetime warranty.

I have been happily using Bushnell Dusk & Dawn 6-18x50mm for my 22LR 50/100 yard testing and it's priced at $84 - https://www.amazon.com/Bushnell-Multi-X-Adjustable-Objective-Riflescope/dp/B00IYHG1MM

Beyond $100 range with well established optics clarity and durability of scope with lifetime warranty, you are looking at Burris Fullfield II/Vortex Crossfire II lines like these:
If you can swing the budget, Burris Fullfield II 6.5-20x50mm for $219 would be another good choice - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000GU870Y
 
Last edited:
I have a high-power variable Barska. I don't know the exact model, but it almost certainly is not the one in the OP.

I bought it for ammunition testing in .22 handguns at 50 yards. It worked perfectly in that role. The optics were certainly not great - color rendition was poor, and there was a great deal of aberration at the edges - but I did not buy the thing for bird watching. In broad daylight, at 50 yards, it allowed me to see the target perfectly and did what I wanted. In the same situation, I would buy the same scope.
 
Problem with being on a tight budget is that we want something good with what little money we have. Eventually we end up spending a hundred bucks on a product that we won't use because it sucks. You would have been better off putting a lighter to the 100 dollars and would have gotten the same results....wasted money. Instead, have patience save a few more weeks or months to supplement the $100 you have on hand' you will be amazed at the difference an extra $50 or $100 makes in the purchase when it comes to optics. Be smart, wait and save.
 
Last edited:
Think of the cost of the ammo you are shooting.
Compare that to the cost of the scope you want to look through.
My lowest price scope is a Bushnell Banner Dusk to Dawn.
For the price it's clarity is quite good.
My only complaint is the thickness of the cross hairs.
 
Another cheap/budget option that I have had reasonably good experience with is monstrum. I've got a couple of there scopes in that 60 to 100 dollar range and have been pleasantly surprised at how good they do work. I have one on a 22 and I've got one with illuminated recticle red/green on a 5.56 ar and they have worked great for couple years now punching paper out to 200 yards.
 
Unfortunately (as Vortex and others have proved time and again, and not in a good way) good optics come with a price. I’ve had inexpensive rifles that shoot lights out but for magnified optics, you can’t go cheap and get something good.

Also the higher in magnification one goes the more issues you will encounter with cheaper scopes. For your application I’d be saving up for a bit and looking for a decent 3-9 or 2-7ish scope.
 
I purchased a refurbished Vortex from A&A Optics, I contacted Vortex, and they are legit, runs about 1/2 retail and Vortex stands behind their product. Some of their lower end products are within your budget.
 
I just bought a Simmons 6 X 18 50 scope for my 10/22. It's really clear and AO goes to 300 yards. I'm happy with the magnification and price was right at $ 79.99 from Natchez. Regular price was just over $100.
 
It should be spelled Barfka. I have known a few people that tried them and they were all junk. For the OP's use I am going to recommend Muellar. They are more money but I have three that are old enough to grow beards and they have been excellent. Two go to 25 X and one to 14 X. Bright, clear to the edges, adjustments work correcty. They used to be extremely popular on RFC but I see little mention of them now. I don't care as mine have always worked very well.
Okay, how did you manage to do that? That post of mine is from a completely different thread..........
 
do know. I responded to the post that mentioned Mueller optics
Something weird is going on, doubleh quoted a post of mine that wasn't even in this thread and you quoted the post of mine he quoted....... I think someone broke the software on the server end probably with the last update/upgrade.
 
Mueller or Athlon are the cheapest I would use. Weaver had some good deals a while back but they are gone now I think.
 
Back
Top