Sgt_Mike1
Member
I found the verbiage and messaging from ATF quite interesting
" Once the firearm is registered, am I required to mark the firearm since I manufactured a short-barreled rifle (SBR)?
If the SBR equipped with a “stabilizing brace” is registered by May 31, 2023, the possessor is allowed to adopt the markings on the firearm. The maker’s marking exception is only applicable to firearms that are registered pursuant to the final rule. If the firearm is a personally made firearm, the possessor must mark in accordance with 27 CFR 478.92 & 479.102 prior to submitting the E-Form 1. "
I know that several have mentioned in other threads on this site that the marking requirements was not required on these after approval. Although I have yet to receive my Form1 approved I did see where a you tube poster displayed the text to the effect of " pursuant to final rule 2012R-08F" on their approved form 1's . And explains how ATF/ LEO's would be able to tell that marking is not required. Merely a observation and thought.
" Once the firearm is registered, am I required to mark the firearm since I manufactured a short-barreled rifle (SBR)?
If the SBR equipped with a “stabilizing brace” is registered by May 31, 2023, the possessor is allowed to adopt the markings on the firearm. The maker’s marking exception is only applicable to firearms that are registered pursuant to the final rule. If the firearm is a personally made firearm, the possessor must mark in accordance with 27 CFR 478.92 & 479.102 prior to submitting the E-Form 1. "
I know that several have mentioned in other threads on this site that the marking requirements was not required on these after approval. Although I have yet to receive my Form1 approved I did see where a you tube poster displayed the text to the effect of " pursuant to final rule 2012R-08F" on their approved form 1's . And explains how ATF/ LEO's would be able to tell that marking is not required. Merely a observation and thought.
