Sorry Chief,
I was attempting to expand on your thought not detract from it. I would still like to know the nature of those "disturbances." I had an enlisted wife that complained of mistreatment in a public school in Kentucky when Dave was stationed at Campbell that stemmed solely from being a military family. If I sounded too protective of the mother I apologize, I was the Captain's lady too long.
No worries! No offense taken and no apologies necessary!
Then maybe that "something else" should be the reason they banned her....why do people put stuff like this on facebook is beyond me!
TOTALLY agree with the Facebook comment. Another fine example of posting personal information that could come back to bite you. But I digress...
Certainly I agree that the "something else" should have been put forth. However, what people mean to say, what they want to communicate, and how they say it often don't match up for a variety of reasons.
Not to mention what the media subsequently decides to put out there for us to read.
I'll freely admit that the first thing I wanted to to was lambast the principal. But once I start looking into things and saw bits and pieces here and there that, for whatever reason, weren't all lumped together in the first place, I start wondering what other pieces I'm not reading about.
For example, the first couple links I read about only mentioned the mother's posting of the CCW permit on Facebook and the subsequent criminal tresspass warning issued because of it.
But after a few more links, I ran across one that indicated there may also have been concerns because of the mother's behavior.
Now I've got to scratch my head in puzzlement wondering what the whole picture actually looks like and what other pieces of the puzzle are out there.
If the mother is totally in the right, then more power to her. But if she's in the spot she's in because she's dug a hole for herself, then she doesn't get my support or sympathy, even if I disagree with the principal with respect to the letter of the law.
