AJC1
Member
If you were going to do a barrel swap on a rifle which cartridge would you choose. Be mindful that any twist rate applies as this would be a special order. Is a 22-250 slinging 90 grain bullets better than a comparable 22 creed.
I was curious if a 7 twist would be required or an 8 would work at the velosity generated. I havent seen load tables for a 90.in a 22-250 yet alone an AI to do the calculationsI would do a .22-250 AI, with a 1-7”twist.
This will allow heaviest.22 bullets to stabilize but also use lighter loaded lighter bullets without limitations.
Established, standardized dies, reamers, components and data.
No significant difference ballistically from .22CM.
(But what fun is that???).
I agree. Both are a means to a perfect end. A 75 BTHP at 3500 FPS.No significant difference ballistically.
Simply due to brass availability I kind of wish we'd gone with the 22 Creedmoor..... It wasn't an issue until Dell loan the 250 to his nephew and the kids shot up all the ammo and lost the brass.....A few years ago I would done a 22-250ai now I may do a 22cm I have to see with brass cost and all before I really decided. I'd go 1-8 even 1-9 I don't think I'd go real heavy but the fast twist would be nice for the hammer bullets that are impressive. As a kid I've always wanted to do a 22-243 the 22cm is just about the same. A mauser in 22 Cheater would be cool As well.
Tuff luck, some shooters just don't realize the cost of ammo or even know brass is reusable.Simply due to brass availability I kind of wish we'd gone with the 22 Creedmoor..... It wasn't an issue until Dell loan the 250 to his nephew and the kids shot up all the ammo and lost the brass.....
I was curious if a 7 twist would be required or an 8 would work at the velosity generated. I havent seen load tables for a 90.in a 22-250 yet alone an AI to do the calculations
I read a lot about that also. Many barrels were greater than 7 like 6.8 or 6.5 which make me want to stay less agressive. If the valkyrie was more popular it would have meant a steady stream of quality 90s. 80s are very popular across several loadings making me question clambering heavier.90 gn bullet will require a 1:7
Also be advised that pushing some 90’s at speeds approaching 3,000 fps has been know to result in bullet failure
Both are a means to a perfect end. A 75 BTHP at 3500 FPS
90 gn bullet will require a 1:7
Also be advised that pushing some 90’s at speeds approaching 3,000 fps has been know to result in bullet failure
Bartlein? Does anybody else make gain twist smokeless barrels?
yeah, pretty much my last dozen barrels were bartlein
My two considerations would be barrel life vs available load data. As a range toy 100fps vs 300 more rounds of barrel life would be a great trade. Were not exactly looking at a barrel with a long life ahead of it.Personally, the benefits of an AI cartridge are twofold: 1) abundantly available non-AI ammo and brass, and 2) ability to shoot factory/standard ammo in a pinch.
BUT...
In this comparison, there wouldn’t really be any advantage to #2, as factory ammo won’t be loaded with an appropriate bullet for this desire. AND... There’s not really much availability lag between 22-250 brass and Creedmoor brass these days, so #1 is relatively moot as well...
So personally, I’d build a Creedmoor.
22 br??? Now that's interesting. I had considered a 30br as a range gun because it has to literally last forever.You won’t get to 1200 with either, OR you’ll get twice that with both. Just depends on what you consider to be “worn out”. I don’t even get to 1200 with 6 creed without losing velocity, let alone cutting the bore area by 15%.
After shooting 22-250 and AI, fast twist 220’s, and (misguided) 22-243, frankly, I wouldn’t be terribly convinced one would really be 300 rounds longer than the other. If barrel life is really a consideration, a 22 Grendel or 22BR would be a better option, or a 6 creed, 6 Dasher, etc. Smaller case or larger bore - but either way, you’d give up speed. If the objective is blistering speed with a relatively big case 22cal, barrel life really isn’t part of the equation.