usmarine0352_2005
member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,796
.
Well, if the anti's are upset, that's good. They could take the high fee, $150 and public transportation to court later.
I wonder if this will make Gov. Quinn press Madigan to appeal to SCOTUS, which could be good for us.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-illinois-gun-control-0524-20130524,0,3277888.story
Well, if the anti's are upset, that's good. They could take the high fee, $150 and public transportation to court later.
I wonder if this will make Gov. Quinn press Madigan to appeal to SCOTUS, which could be good for us.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-illinois-gun-control-0524-20130524,0,3277888.story
..
Quinn, Emanuel lash out at Madigan gun bill
Plan would void strict local firearms laws like city's assault weapons ban, foes say
By Ray Long, Rick Pearson and Rafael Guerrero, Chicago Tribune reporters
8:35 p.m. CDT, May 23, 2013
"This legislation as written is a massive overreach that goes far beyond the conceal carry issue," said Quinn spokeswoman Brooke Anderson. "The measure would repeal Chicago's assault weapons ban and put public safety at risk. We oppose this."
The Senate bill would require applicants to get separate endorsements — one for Chicago and one for the rest of the state — to carry a concealed weapon statewide. Those carve-outs are not in the House bill — a position the NRA has backed.
.